global1
global1's JournalAre We Sure That The Columbia University Protesters Are All.....
students?
Could there be any outside provocateurs involved - inciting the students to violence?
The clips they are showing of the protesters storming the building on campus - look similar to the storming of the Capitol Bldg on Jan 6th. Given these clips - I'm wondering how the Repugs will react to this storming of this building on campus and what they will say about it. I'm wondering what pearls of hypocrisy will come from their lips about this storming of the building?
Could this building storming - just be a way to embarrass Biden?
Has Tr**p Made Any Comments On Truth Social About.....
last nights - Correspondence Dinner?
I really curious about his take on it.
Did Kelly O'Donnell Eat Dinner.....
Her head has been turned toward Biden's the whole time he was trying to eat. She's been bending his ear the whole time.
Let him take a sip of his wine - Kelly.
Who Came Up With The Content Of The Negative Stories About Tr**p's Opponents......
that were placed in the Enquirer? How did that work?
Did Tr**p's people tell Pecker who they wanted to go after and what should be printed about them? (i.e., Cruz's father's role in the Kennedy Assassination)
Did Pecker's team just target Tr**p's opponents that were running in the primary and just create and put sensational stories about them in the tabloid?
Was there a dialogue between Tr**p and Pecker to discuss this?
Did Tr**p give Pecker the content to put into the Enquirer on the positive stories that were published?
Did Pecker run to Tr**p and tell him - we got a source that gave us this story about you Donald - should I kill it?
Bottom line - how did this work? What were the mechanics of these 'catch and kill stories' and 'planted stories' that made it to press?
Did You Notice That Any Time It Sounds Like Dreeben - When Answering A Question.....
is about to say something that the Conservative Judge doesn't want him to say - they interrupt him and cut his answer off. They don't let him answer questions fully - because they are anticipating the point that he wants to make and it doesn't fit the narrative that they want to achieve.
IMHO - debating this immunity issue - is absurd on the surface.
Nobody is above the law. President's included.
So We Learned More Today That Tr**p Was A Fake From The Git Go.....
He's a public relations dream. All hype and build-up based on made up and planted positive stories about himself and negative stories about his opponents and enemies.
The rag sheets and Mark Burnett made him a star. Along with the MSM that went along for the ride. Combined they sucked in the 'non-thinking for themselves' masses and created a cult following around a complete lying fraud.
The conman behind the curtain.
An arrogant, cavalier, disdainful, haughty, high-and-mighty, insolent, grifter and huckster. All hype. No substance.
And till today he's got a lot of gullible Americans conned and still believing in his lies.
He does this by calling out his opponents as the liars and cheaters. Projecting his faults, foibles and character flaws on them and away from himself.
Oh - I'm so hoping that this trial holds him accountable and opens the eyes of his adoring MAGA's.
I just don't know how after all that's gone down - all the impeachments and indictments - that they haven't seen through this guy yet.
Plausible Deniability.....
If Tr**p is acquitted because of 'plausible deniability' it makes one wonder to what extent Tr**p and his people went out of their way to create a situation where they can use a 'plausible deniability' defense.
He thought the checks he was signing were for legitimate 'legal expenses'. He was just doing his job as the primary person in the Tr**p Org and signing the checks that someone else put in front of him. He didn't have to know what the expenses were for. He didn't know what he was signing these checks for.
If that be the case - wouldn't one be suspect of the machinations that he and his minions had to go through to be able to pull something like this off?
Wouldn't that be enough to establish that they plotted to be able to use this as an excuse/defense?
Wouldn't that point to and intent to deceive?
What Were The CBS Execs Thinking When They Canceled 'So Help Me Todd'?...
That show is terrific. It's a perfect blend of a courtroom/lawyer drama and a fun comedy.
One falls for all the characters as the character development is executed perfectly. They worked together and pulled it off that made each of them believable.
The show was just getting it's stride and like always these braniacs pulled the plug just as it was attracting its audience.
Instead they're putting their bets on a Columbo ripoff - Elsbeth. They substituted a woman to portray the Colombo role. Boring. It's been done before.
I'm hoping that fans of 'So Help Me Todd' start a campaign for CBS to reconsider their decision.
This was one show I look forward to watching every week. I was sure it was going to have a long run.
So if you are also a fan of 'Todd' like me - please contact CBS and get them to re-evaluate their decision.
Bring back 'So Help Me Todd'.
So Help Me Todd Has Quickly Become My Favorite TV Program......
If you haven't watched it - take a look at it. The cast is wonderful and its full of comedy and good fun.
I usually don't like courtroom/lawyer type shows - but this one they pulled off an entertaining hour.
I recommend.
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Oct 22, 2004, 02:47 AMNumber of posts: 25,263
