anamnua
anamnua's JournalA pointer for the American MSM
A vital, and well-earned, forensic dissection of the lame arguments of a Trump acolyte/ Putin apologist by a British pundit. Her narrative was exposed as a pile of garbology in a matter of minutes forcing her to quit with her tail between her legs. More of this sort of thing is needed on the other side of the pond.
Putin/Hitler
The comparisons are obvious. Men who keenly resent a recent humiliation of their country (Hitler: The Versailles Treaty; Putin; the post-Cold War settlement). And both saw it as their mission to reverse same.
Putin does not have a targeted ethnic group on which to extract revenge; the fact that he is not as bad as Hitler is scant consolation.
Both sought weaknesses they could exploit through threats and coercion.
Both manufactured a fake casus belli (Giewitz, Donbas). Putin exploited Russocentric parts of Ukraine the way Hitler exploited the Sudetenland.
They are both characterised by iron singlemindedness and therein lies their great strength — and their great weakness. Their focused determination achieves much when the general situation is conducive to that approach. When the need for nuanced thinking, revision of previous positions, retreat, listening to wiser counsels etc comes into play they become badly unstuck: their maniacal monofixation makes it impossible to act any other way but in character.
On local (Irish) radio at the moment.
There’s a repub on whinging about mass personation (turning up to vote pretending to be someone else) by Democrats.
She is a spokesperson for ‘GOP overseas Ireland’
Profile Information
Gender: MaleMember since: Fri Jan 4, 2008, 11:20 PM
Number of posts: 1,432