Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Random Boomer

Random Boomer's Journal
Random Boomer's Journal
October 2, 2014

Guaranteed method for making things worse

The very best way to ensure an Ebola epidemic in this country is to enforce draconian quarantines on people who can't afford to stay home from work and who need to get out of the house to shop for food. If these people are being monitored and aren't running a fever, THEY ARE NOT INFECTIOUS.

Locking them up and then threatening to treat them like criminals sends a very clear message "Avoid the authorities if you're sick."

If you're going to quarantine non-symptomatic people, in order to calm the fearful populace, then government needs to cover lost wages, provide shopping services, do everything in its power to make self-reporting the easiest and desireable course of action.

I'm feeling a lot LESS safe after reading this news.

July 28, 2013

Security checkpoint at the movie theater

My partner and I left the house this afternoon to see Wolverine, but we had one qualm about this plan; the last time we'd been to the movies at this particular theater complex, we'd had our purses searched. This change in process caught us by surprise, with tickets in hand, so we went through that security check as requested, but this time around we weren't so eager to repeat that exercise.

On the face of it -- as blandly iterated by the theater manager -- this policy is about checking bags for weapons to ensure a safer experience for customers. In truth, it's nonsense. Men are the most likely people to carry guns and shoot-up an establishment and they're far more likely to stick a gun in a pocket of their cargo pants than in a man-purse. The most violent movie incident in Aurora, Colorado involved a man with assault rifles entering through an exit door. Checking women's purses is not an effective policy; it's just a token (and somewhat discriminatory) gesture to create an illusion of safety while furthering a very real erosion of personal privacy.

Beyond that inane illusion of saftey, however, is yet another creeping normalization of "Your papers, please" authoritarian control of our daily lives. Our gun culture resists any kind of regulation of our freedom to own weapons, but then meekly bows down to the checkpoints against gun violence that permeate our participation in community activities.

This is ultimately what my partner and I were objecting to: the normalization of authoritarian control that numbs everyone to a process that can slide into crowd-control with less sterling motivations than protecting us from the violence of unbalanced individuals.

The larger context was emphasized this morning, before we even left for the theater, as we listened to Diane Feinstein discuss Snowden on a news program. Without even blinking at the screaming irony of her own statements, Feinstein spoke somberly about our reassurances to Russia that we would not torture or kill Snowden, and that she felt as a former KGB agent, Putin would most assuredly understand the United States' concern over Snowden's actions.

When we've reached the point where we count on the shared understanding of the KGB to act in our national interest, we have blatantly and openly admitted that we are a fascist state.

Welcome to the American Homeland.

Profile Information

Member since: 2003 before July 6th
Number of posts: 4,173
Latest Discussions»Random Boomer's Journal