Joe Biden's ridiculous attack on Elizabeth Warren's 'elitism'

[Jakes Progress]

118. Ask Biden the same question.

You don't get any answer.

If your job is to take money from the poor and middle class and give it to billionaires, you need to be out of a job.

I'm sorry. The numbers are very clear. The only people who keep saying they won't work are people who do not explain why, and who support other candidates.

Most people where? DU?

You still don't explain how you can do everything that M4A will do and pay insurance profits and expenses for less that you can do everything M4A will do. That's the part that the hard middle keeps ignoring. When logic and facts don't support a position, I guess the thing to do is call the other people names.

If trump wins, it will be because of the same reason he did last time. Sure a bunch of people who hated Hillary for the primary eventually voted for her, but they spent months trying to convince the undecided just how bad she was. This primary and the debates have been a huge fiasco. The Democratic primary might as well have been devised by the gop. See the George Takes tweet on the home page. Democrats need to stop calling other Democrats names like "liar" "addled" "angry" "crazy".

How the hell can Biden campaign for Warren if she wins, or vice versa. Even our Democratic candidates are too concerned with winning the primary instead of the election.

Biden is a good man. Warren is smart. Either would be not just better than trump, but truly good at the job.

As far as the health care "debate", it is moot. With a republican congress and a judiciary stacked with trump appointees, we won't get M4A. Nor a public option. We won't even get to expand the ACA. So trying to kill each other over it is just dumb. It is only a campaign point for both candidates, each of whom is smart enough to know this. The candidates need to work together instead of helping the gop tear each other down.

I guess my point for Warren is that she at least stands up the Pharma and Big I. I think she would be less accommodating to corporate interests.