Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

niyad

(113,279 posts)

5. that is possible. I am astounded at all the faux snooze threads on this site.

Reply to still_one (Reply #4)

Wed May 18, 2016, 10:36 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox news had Clinton winning Penn by only 2 pts [View all] DLCWIdem May 2016 OP

we are quoting faux snooze now? really????? niyad May 2016 #1

I think the OP is trying to counter the posts going around quoting a Fox still_one May 2016 #4

that is possible. I am astounded at all the faux snooze threads on this site. niyad May 2016 #5

That bothers me also, and it isn't just faux threads, it is a fair number of links still_one May 2016 #7

I know, and it is getting steadily worse. niyad May 2016 #8

Don't entirely agree PJMcK May 2016 #26

Faux Poll BlueNoMatterWho May 2016 #2

Even if correct, she only needs about 40% to still win in delegates. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #3

Hillary winning 55 to 43in Penn, is a pretty off poll. The National Poll from fox still_one May 2016 #6

Your not getting me. Every single poll had the same number. I thought it was a typo. DLCWIdem May 2016 #9

All Their sampling was obviously screwed up. And no, I didn't get your original still_one May 2016 #10

I thought screwed up on purpose. DLCWIdem May 2016 #11

I don't know still_one May 2016 #12

What are you talking about? Fox had her up 11 in PA ram2008 May 2016 #13

No. When I looked it on the 538 just days before the primary the poll said Clinton +2 DLCWIdem May 2016 #14

Well, you must've imagined it, because no such poll exists n/t ram2008 May 2016 #15

the poll your quoting was from April 10. the one I saw was around April 18. byline was Sanders sur DLCWIdem May 2016 #16

Your eyes must've deceived you. There was no such poll. ram2008 May 2016 #17

quick look right now DLCWIdem May 2016 #18

Your first link doesn't show PA, which is what we're talking about, second link is broken. ram2008 May 2016 #19

again thats California which is still up. Look on the Ca 538 site. PA and MD were already dropped DLCWIdem May 2016 #20

California has not yet voted, so the accuracy or inaccuracy of the polls there cannot be measured ram2008 May 2016 #21

As compared to the other polls. DLCWIdem May 2016 #23

the top pol is 10. Fox poll 2. bottom poll 12. Quite a difference 10-------2--------12 DLCWIdem May 2016 #24

Actually my post was about numerous Fox polls DLCWIdem May 2016 #22

You're not making any sense at all, the polls you're talking about don't exist ram2008 May 2016 #25

I just found another poll from Fox that has Clinton up +2 DLCWIdem May 2016 #27

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fox news had Clinton winn...»Reply #5