Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Delegate count: Clinton 2,202, Sanders 1,455 181 from victory [View all]Gomez163
(2,039 posts)33. I've cited two sources already. You just refuse to believe because
it goes against your Bernie belief system.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yada yada yada. How many have voted at the National Dem Convention where the votes count?
Buzz Clik
May 2016
#58
They have already pledged their vote as THEY ARE ALLOWED TO DO IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY.
KittyWampus
May 2016
#29
I haven't been following too closely since Iowa, but those numbers look faked to me.
stone space
May 2016
#7
It's stupid to count supers now. THe mantra is they will follow the pledged delegate winner.
morningfog
May 2016
#30
Without the word "superdelegates" appearing, your OP is a blatant and knowing lie. (nt)
stone space
May 2016
#40
It's absurd to not count super delegates because in the Democratic Party they may pledge
KittyWampus
May 2016
#31
Publishing these numbers in an OP without the word "superdelegates" even appearing is a lie.
stone space
May 2016
#39
That's unfortunate. The numbers are a blatant lie. Sad to see DU supporting knowing lies. (nt)
stone space
May 2016
#47
Here we go - Its mathematically impossible for Sanders to win more pledged delegates.
Gomez163
May 2016
#64