Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(580 posts)

3. Is that an error? They show Hillary higher %. I want to believe you!!

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:38 AM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT Just ticked MA for Sanders - EDIT now back to HRC - interesting. [View all] Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 OP

Yeah, via the AP Cal Carpenter Mar 2016 #1

Well I'll be goddamned. What's going on there? morningfog Mar 2016 #2

Is that an error? They show Hillary higher %. I want to believe you!! DiehardLiberal Mar 2016 #3

Oh crap - they fixed it.. DiehardLiberal Mar 2016 #8

What the heck?? Avalux Mar 2016 #4

NBC and everyone else has called it for Clinton. MADem Mar 2016 #5

But the numbers still display HRC 51, SBS 48 cyberswede Mar 2016 #6

I was just noticing that. madfloridian Mar 2016 #7

It's back to HRC favored @ 51. nt cyberswede Mar 2016 #10

They corrected it. ;-( DiehardLiberal Mar 2016 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 #9

they switched it back kydo Mar 2016 #12

They did - interesting. nt. Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 #14

Now it's ticked for Clinton...nt SidDithers Mar 2016 #13

I saw that... Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #15

and it now says HRC the winner kydo Mar 2016 #16

I think that was an error. They show HRC as the winner now. nt cyberswede Mar 2016 #17

That was really weird. nt Zorra Mar 2016 #18

I was following real time results on google. smiley Mar 2016 #19