HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » NYT Just ticked MA for Sa...

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:35 AM

NYT Just ticked MA for Sanders - EDIT now back to HRC - interesting.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results




EDIT- Well shit, back to HRC now.

19 replies, 1416 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply NYT Just ticked MA for Sanders - EDIT now back to HRC - interesting. (Original post)
Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 OP
Cal Carpenter Mar 2016 #1
morningfog Mar 2016 #2
DiehardLiberal Mar 2016 #3
DiehardLiberal Mar 2016 #8
Avalux Mar 2016 #4
MADem Mar 2016 #5
cyberswede Mar 2016 #6
madfloridian Mar 2016 #7
cyberswede Mar 2016 #10
DiehardLiberal Mar 2016 #11
Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 #9
kydo Mar 2016 #12
Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 #14
SidDithers Mar 2016 #13
Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #15
kydo Mar 2016 #16
cyberswede Mar 2016 #17
Zorra Mar 2016 #18
smiley Mar 2016 #19

Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:36 AM

1. Yeah, via the AP

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:36 AM

2. Well I'll be goddamned. What's going on there?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:38 AM

3. Is that an error? They show Hillary higher %. I want to believe you!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DiehardLiberal (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:39 AM

8. Oh crap - they fixed it..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:38 AM

4. What the heck??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:38 AM

5. NBC and everyone else has called it for Clinton.

That's not one of those fake pages, is it.....? What's funny is, the number for HRC is higher than the one for Sanders.

Someone is asleep at the switch! Ahh, the paper of record....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:38 AM

6. But the numbers still display HRC 51, SBS 48

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #6)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:39 AM

7. I was just noticing that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madfloridian (Reply #7)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:39 AM

10. It's back to HRC favored @ 51. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madfloridian (Reply #7)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:39 AM

11. They corrected it. ;-(

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:40 AM

12. they switched it back

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kydo (Reply #12)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:40 AM

14. They did - interesting. nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:40 AM

13. Now it's ticked for Clinton...nt

Sid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:41 AM

15. I saw that...

It had to be a typo, or someone with a twisted sense of humor at the NYT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:41 AM

16. and it now says HRC the winner

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:41 AM

17. I think that was an error. They show HRC as the winner now. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:46 AM

18. That was really weird. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:48 AM

19. I was following real time results on google.

It said Sanders won MASS. Screen was like that for 20 seconds and then changed to Clinton won.

Weird stuff going on for sure. Good thing Bill was there today to oversee things.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread