Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Experts: Clinton emails could have compromised CIA names [View all]pnwmom
(109,388 posts)88. My point remains. The problem isn't with whether she used a private server or
the .gov account. The problem is that the Rethugs insisting on seeing all of her emails, wherever they were located. And some of them were retroactively classified and/or redacted. And since any email system can be hacked, there is a possibility a hacker could have seen the redactions and drawn conclusions from them.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How many went to jail over releasing Plame's name? And that action really was a crime.
tonyt53
Jun 2016
#1
That's OK because Cheney, Rove were involved in Valerie Plame & they weren't punished
Chasstev365
Jun 2016
#2
No is not excused necessary: Hillary was cleared: the was no clarity to the rules
lewebley3
Jun 2016
#17
No this is over except for a political attack on Hillary that has not worked.
lewebley3
Jun 2016
#10
not LBN - could have/may have is analysis and opiniion not news. AP? the reviled enemy AP lol nt
msongs
Jun 2016
#12
I've never bad mouthed the AP. I've only questioned their motives of their announcement
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#25
No, the same situation would have occurred. They would have seen the exact same emails --
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#46
They know that the .gov system was hacked. They have said that there is no evidence
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#83
The emails are small cake compared to accepting money, through her foundation, from saudi royals
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#37
She donates to the foundation. She doesn't get any funds "through" the Foundation. n/t
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#47
None of them get paid any salaries, so I don't know why you included the salary info.
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#64
I only get four paragraphs for the excerpt but I'm open to debate that with you if you'd like nt
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#38
You implied it with you assertion that FBI said there is "evidence," so stop playing coy.
SunSeeker
Jun 2016
#57
re: "the FBI officially confirmed that they recovered files from Hillary's server"
thesquanderer
Jun 2016
#66
The pdf of the court filing on Monday specifically mentioned materials gathered from
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#71
A fricken joke.. these experts are clueless when they give an actual traitor like Darth Cheney
gohuskies
Jun 2016
#79
At this stage I would say it would be inappropriate for anyone to endorse her
Rosa Luxemburg
Jun 2016
#97