Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(42,700 posts)
13. and for her to become president, several other highly unlikely events:
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:51 PM
Nov 2017

Simultaneous Impeachment and conviction (or resignation) of Trump and Pence, which could only occur if the repubs allowed it to happen and there isn't snowball's chance in hell of that happening.

That would require that the GOP lose the House in 2018. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #1
AND for the Dems to win 2/3 of the Senate shanny Nov 2017 #30
Too Much Ambition In The House Me. Nov 2017 #2
Pelosi comes to mind.... n/t dixiegrrrrl Nov 2017 #14
Yes... Mike Nelson Nov 2017 #3
What??? We have to win the house majority though, right? The Wielding Truth Nov 2017 #4
Yes, we would radical noodle Nov 2017 #5
OMFG Va Lefty Nov 2017 #6
How many times is this silly idea going to be trotted out? onenote Nov 2017 #7
Richard Painter is aware that the Speaker of the House is #3 in the order of succession, behind only pnwmom Nov 2017 #18
No, he's aware there is not a realistic scenario onenote Nov 2017 #19
In 2020 the R's might not be controlling the House any longer. I don't think anyone pnwmom Nov 2017 #38
what would be the point of an impeachment proceeding AFTER the 2020 elections? onenote Nov 2017 #39
I meant 2018, but the same principle applies. I obviously think the facts will be far more damning pnwmom Nov 2017 #42
I don't care what the fact show. The republicans will not agree to a strategy that puts a Democrat onenote Nov 2017 #44
Again, you don't think there will be the equivalent of dead bodies. I do. n/t pnwmom Nov 2017 #45
Dead bodies? Really? onenote Nov 2017 #47
I said "the equivalent" and I meant it with only slight exaggeration. pnwmom Nov 2017 #48
Nonsense. onenote Nov 2017 #49
Enough ordinary Americans will believe it that the R's will fear for their re-election chances. pnwmom Nov 2017 #50
The Republicans fear their base more than ordinary republicans onenote Nov 2017 #51
Technically that would work, except The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2017 #8
and for her to become president, several other highly unlikely events: onenote Nov 2017 #13
No, still isn't a way. brooklynite Nov 2017 #9
Pence is probably as vulnerable as Trump under Mueller's microscope. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #41
Wrong wrong wrong! unblock Nov 2017 #10
Democrats are currently trying to distance themselves from the Clintons madville Nov 2017 #11
Do you have a source for that assertion? lapucelle Nov 2017 #32
Please stop. Ace Rothstein Nov 2017 #12
this not very well thought out idea forgets that............ Takket Nov 2017 #15
+1 onenote Nov 2017 #21
There is a way to get a Democrat in the White House before 1/20/21, but not necessarily HRC jmowreader Nov 2017 #16
In what universe would the Republicans allow this scenario? onenote Nov 2017 #20
Up that to one jmowreader Nov 2017 #34
Even so, they would work the timing so that they controlled who was his successor onenote Nov 2017 #36
Easiest way to get a Democratic President in 2018 is to get Yupster Nov 2017 #46
What more proof could anyone need that this Painter guy shouldn't be taken seriously melman Nov 2017 #17
Disagree...he's come up with good gems.. HipChick Nov 2017 #22
And yet he doesn't even know the Speaker doesn't have to be a House member onenote Nov 2017 #25
Thank goodness he's not a divider and at least R B Garr Nov 2017 #24
It seems you're not very familiar with who this guy actually is melman Nov 2017 #35
He sure has a good handle on priorities. R B Garr Nov 2017 #40
Yep, Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2017 #27
Yes, why on earth would anyone take a board member of this organization seriously? lapucelle Nov 2017 #33
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #23
Plans with low probability of success are a waste of time Loki Liesmith Nov 2017 #26
Plans with "no" probability of success ClarendonDem Nov 2017 #29
What's with the "sic" after "chuse"? former9thward Nov 2017 #28
OFFS Stinky The Clown Nov 2017 #31
Remember Nixon Agneau karynnj Nov 2017 #37
No. Lil Missy Nov 2017 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There IS a way for Hillar...»Reply #13