Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)NYT: This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened. [View all]
Dwindling Odds of CoincidenceCharles M. Blow APRIL 3, 2017
We are still not conclusively able to connect the dots on the question of whether there was any coordination or collusion between members of Donald Trumps campaign and the Russians who interfered in our election to benefit him, but those dots do continue to multiply at an alarming rate.
First, and we have to keep saying this because this fact keeps getting obscured in the subterfuge of deflection, misdirection and ideological finger-pointing about what has yet to be proven: It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election. This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened.
The investigations, rightly, are seeking to figure out exactly how and to what degree, and those questions obviously depend on knowing more about campaign contacts with Russian meddlers.
................
The journalistic caution in me keeps having to write that these could all be coincidences, but the journalistic instinct has learned long ago that coincidence is the albino alligator of political reality: It exists, but is exceedingly rare.
the rest:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/opinion/dwindling-odds-of-coincidence.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
40 replies, 18360 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (210)
ReplyReply to this post
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened. [View all]
kpete
Apr 2017
OP
I never believed it when they said Russia didnt affect the vote count. They dont just mess with
Amaryllis
Apr 2017
#36
Monday early AM --Donalds first tweet attacks Hillary over the debates. Wheres his Republican Aides?
Sunlei
Apr 2017
#3
only one sane course of action - invalidate the election and have a revote!
NRaleighLiberal
Apr 2017
#7
Since the House Intel Committee is unable, the Senate IC must get them from the IRS now.nt
Hekate
Apr 2017
#29
"It moves from the zealot Mike Pence, to the weasel Paul Ryan to anti-abortion crusader..."
JTFrog
Apr 2017
#9
Figure with all the sources and all the leaking, we would see some hard evidence of collusion
jmg257
Apr 2017
#22