Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:30 AM Apr 2017

NYT: This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened. [View all]

Dwindling Odds of Coincidence
Charles M. Blow APRIL 3, 2017




We are still not conclusively able to connect the dots on the question of whether there was any coordination or collusion between members of Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians who interfered in our election to benefit him, but those dots do continue to multiply at an alarming rate.

First, and we have to keep saying this because this fact keeps getting obscured in the subterfuge of deflection, misdirection and ideological finger-pointing about what has yet to be proven: It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election. This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened.

The investigations, rightly, are seeking to figure out exactly how and to what degree, and those questions obviously depend on knowing more about campaign contacts with Russian meddlers.

................

The journalistic caution in me keeps having to write that these could all be coincidences, but the journalistic instinct has learned long ago that coincidence is the albino alligator of political reality: It exists, but is exceedingly rare.


the rest:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/opinion/dwindling-odds-of-coincidence.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election. Botany Apr 2017 #1
Oh... all those intelligence agencies must be wrong and his is right. DK504 Apr 2017 #21
And the Russians left their fingerprints all over the place Botany Apr 2017 #25
I never believed it when they said Russia didnt affect the vote count. They dont just mess with Amaryllis Apr 2017 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #32
Kick. dalton99a Apr 2017 #2
Monday early AM --Donalds first tweet attacks Hillary over the debates. Wheres his Republican Aides? Sunlei Apr 2017 #3
The burden of proof isn't "conclusive." Cary Apr 2017 #4
Agreed. He refuses to release his taxes, the people have a right to know. KittyWampus Apr 2017 #6
And that's even before an investigation has gotten cranked up gratuitous Apr 2017 #19
So, I don't know where we are in terms of proving a particular case Cary Apr 2017 #20
K&R...👍🏼 spanone Apr 2017 #5
only one sane course of action - invalidate the election and have a revote! NRaleighLiberal Apr 2017 #7
If only Plucketeer Apr 2017 #11
Absolutely! Duppers Apr 2017 #12
There is NO constitutional mechanism for doing this gratuitous Apr 2017 #24
That's simply not going to happen. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #40
His tax returns will have the missing dot. ffr Apr 2017 #8
Since the House Intel Committee is unable, the Senate IC must get them from the IRS now.nt Hekate Apr 2017 #29
"It moves from the zealot Mike Pence, to the weasel Paul Ryan to anti-abortion crusader..." JTFrog Apr 2017 #9
I'll take sane ideologues over a lunatic, any day. (nt) Paladin Apr 2017 #14
The two aren't mutually exclusive. CentralMass Apr 2017 #27
They seem to be, right now. (nt) Paladin Apr 2017 #31
facts matter Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #10
Charles Blow is a delight as always. lark Apr 2017 #13
I absolutely agree Skittles Apr 2017 #34
Gibbs Rule 39 -- There is no such thing as coincidence. LiberalFighter Apr 2017 #15
LOL! I'm a fan, too. mnhtnbb Apr 2017 #23
It was clear to me on election night Blue_Roses Apr 2017 #16
Bingo!!!! hamsterjill Apr 2017 #17
Wow, Charles, tell us how you really feel... kag Apr 2017 #18
Figure with all the sources and all the leaking, we would see some hard evidence of collusion jmg257 Apr 2017 #22
Order of succession be damned FakeNoose Apr 2017 #26
Yes to your posit. eom sprinkleeninow Apr 2017 #38
Kick forever Hekate Apr 2017 #28
k and r--and the more the orange madman screams and tries to deflect, the more we niyad Apr 2017 #30
What goes around comes around harun Apr 2017 #33
As Malcolm Nance said, "Coincidence requires a lot of planning." nt SunSeeker Apr 2017 #35
kick LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #37
RE AdamJohnson20 Apr 2017 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: This is not a debata...