Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:30 AM
kpete (70,907 posts)
NYT: This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened.
Dwindling Odds of Coincidence
Charles M. Blow APRIL 3, 2017 We are still not conclusively able to connect the dots on the question of whether there was any coordination or collusion between members of Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians who interfered in our election to benefit him, but those dots do continue to multiply at an alarming rate. First, and we have to keep saying this because this fact keeps getting obscured in the subterfuge of deflection, misdirection and ideological finger-pointing about what has yet to be proven: It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election. This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened. The investigations, rightly, are seeking to figure out exactly how and to what degree, and those questions obviously depend on knowing more about campaign contacts with Russian meddlers. ................ The journalistic caution in me keeps having to write that these could all be coincidences, but the journalistic instinct has learned long ago that coincidence is the albino alligator of political reality: It exists, but is exceedingly rare. the rest: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/opinion/dwindling-odds-of-coincidence.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
|
40 replies, 17988 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
kpete | Apr 2017 | OP |
Botany | Apr 2017 | #1 | |
DK504 | Apr 2017 | #21 | |
Botany | Apr 2017 | #25 | |
Amaryllis | Apr 2017 | #36 | |
Name removed | Apr 2017 | #32 | |
dalton99a | Apr 2017 | #2 | |
Sunlei | Apr 2017 | #3 | |
Cary | Apr 2017 | #4 | |
KittyWampus | Apr 2017 | #6 | |
gratuitous | Apr 2017 | #19 | |
Cary | Apr 2017 | #20 | |
spanone | Apr 2017 | #5 | |
NRaleighLiberal | Apr 2017 | #7 | |
Plucketeer | Apr 2017 | #11 | |
Duppers | Apr 2017 | #12 | |
gratuitous | Apr 2017 | #24 | |
Warren DeMontague | Apr 2017 | #40 | |
ffr | Apr 2017 | #8 | |
Hekate | Apr 2017 | #29 | |
JTFrog | Apr 2017 | #9 | |
Paladin | Apr 2017 | #14 | |
CentralMass | Apr 2017 | #27 | |
Paladin | Apr 2017 | #31 | |
Fast Walker 52 | Apr 2017 | #10 | |
lark | Apr 2017 | #13 | |
Skittles | Apr 2017 | #34 | |
LiberalFighter | Apr 2017 | #15 | |
mnhtnbb | Apr 2017 | #23 | |
Blue_Roses | Apr 2017 | #16 | |
hamsterjill | Apr 2017 | #17 | |
kag | Apr 2017 | #18 | |
jmg257 | Apr 2017 | #22 | |
FakeNoose | Apr 2017 | #26 | |
sprinkleeninow | Apr 2017 | #38 | |
Hekate | Apr 2017 | #28 | |
niyad | Apr 2017 | #30 | |
harun | Apr 2017 | #33 | |
SunSeeker | Apr 2017 | #35 | |
LaydeeBug | Apr 2017 | #37 | |
AdamJohnson20 | Apr 2017 | #39 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:32 AM
Botany (67,435 posts)
1. It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Botany (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:41 AM
DK504 (3,847 posts)
21. Oh... all those intelligence agencies must be wrong and his is right.
Oh no....there you go again.
|
Response to DK504 (Reply #21)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:07 PM
Botany (67,435 posts)
25. And the Russians left their fingerprints all over the place
Russia was into Wisconsin @ the county level.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/24/russians-suspected-hacking-wisconsin-dems/97023222/ But it is all fake news. |
Response to Botany (Reply #25)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 08:48 PM
Amaryllis (9,446 posts)
36. I never believed it when they said Russia didnt affect the vote count. They dont just mess with
voter reg databases for fun and stop with that.
|
Response to Botany (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:52 AM
Sunlei (22,651 posts)
3. Monday early AM --Donalds first tweet attacks Hillary over the debates. Wheres his Republican Aides?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:03 AM
Cary (11,719 posts)
4. The burden of proof isn't "conclusive."
In terms of criminal prosecution, it's beyond a reasonable doubt. For our purposes, here, it's far less. In fact I respectfully suggest that WE, THE PEOPLE have an absolute right to know that our president isn't a traitor and the burden of proof is on Trump and his handlers, or whatever they are.
|
Response to Cary (Reply #4)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:09 AM
KittyWampus (55,894 posts)
6. Agreed. He refuses to release his taxes, the people have a right to know.
Response to Cary (Reply #4)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:25 AM
gratuitous (80,515 posts)
19. And that's even before an investigation has gotten cranked up
I'd say we're past a preponderance of the evidence, and practically at clear and convincing evidence of Russian meddling. Let's get a full-scale investigation going; are there no Republicans in Congress who value the United States over their party? Who think that hiding away the influence of a hostile foreign government is the path to our nation's destruction? Where are the patriotic Republicans who will aggressively investigate, consequences to their own party be damned?
|
Response to gratuitous (Reply #19)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:32 AM
Cary (11,719 posts)
20. So, I don't know where we are in terms of proving a particular case
For one thing we don't know what the FBI knows. We only know what has been reported but from what has been reported I think you're correct. There certainly appears to be a growing mountain of evidence of conflicts of interest everywhere and probable impropriety.
Are there any patriotic Republicans? Each and every one of them sold themselves out to opportunism long ago, when they decided that they could make their own reality. All we have, as human beings, are facts and reason. When people will not accept facts and reason then they succumb to evil. That's ironic, given their claims. But it's true. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:13 AM
NRaleighLiberal (58,252 posts)
7. only one sane course of action - invalidate the election and have a revote!
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:35 AM
Plucketeer (12,882 posts)
11. If only
Of course, I'd like to hit the lottery too. I wonder how the odds figure against each other?
|
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:36 AM
Duppers (26,311 posts)
12. Absolutely!
Chances of that happening?
The whole election in not valid, not just Trump's presidency. |
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:07 PM
gratuitous (80,515 posts)
24. There is NO constitutional mechanism for doing this
Please leave the magical thinking to our Freeperite friends.
|
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 06:03 AM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
40. That's simply not going to happen.
The more fucked up the situation gets, the more crucial it is to stick to what is actually in the Constitution.
Ditching the constitution would be a tremendously bad idea. The remedy here is impeachment or resignation. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:17 AM
ffr (21,992 posts)
8. His tax returns will have the missing dot.
Which is why he won't release them. Rosneft deal more than likely at the heart of money dealings. When you get a stake of ownership in something without consideration, there are strings attached.
|
Response to ffr (Reply #8)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:41 PM
Hekate (82,926 posts)
29. Since the House Intel Committee is unable, the Senate IC must get them from the IRS now.nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:20 AM
JTFrog (14,274 posts)
9. "It moves from the zealot Mike Pence, to the weasel Paul Ryan to anti-abortion crusader..."
Polls continue to find a strong appetite for the ultimate remedy: Trump’s impeachment. You would get no resistance from me if it ever came to that. But I also understand the order of succession and that, too, gives me pause.
It moves from the zealot Mike Pence, to the weasel Paul Ryan, to anti-abortion crusader Orrin Hatch, to Rex “Russian Order of Friendship” Tillerson, to the former Hollywood producer Steven Mnuchin, who had to apologize last week for plugging “The Lego Batman Movie,” for which he was an executive producer. The list goes on and on. Yes, an administration without Trump would be less of an international embarrassment and exceedingly more predictable, but these men have all cozied up to Trump or were picked by him, so there is little daylight among them on policy. Then there is the brazenly political, callously calculating school of thought — which is as dangerous as it is interesting — that holds that the severe distaste for sitting-President-Trump will likely be the best liberal motivator for success in the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential election. Following this logic, a crippled Trump is better than a vanquished one. Doesn't seem to be any way we end up but fucked. ![]() |
Response to JTFrog (Reply #9)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:47 AM
Paladin (26,592 posts)
14. I'll take sane ideologues over a lunatic, any day. (nt)
Response to Paladin (Reply #14)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:13 PM
CentralMass (14,624 posts)
27. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
Response to CentralMass (Reply #27)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 01:44 PM
Paladin (26,592 posts)
31. They seem to be, right now. (nt)
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:20 AM
Fast Walker 52 (7,723 posts)
10. facts matter
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:43 AM
lark (22,208 posts)
13. Charles Blow is a delight as always.
He's a great journalist and captures the present moment, as well as the angst so many are feeling, so well.
|
Response to lark (Reply #13)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 03:23 PM
Skittles (148,639 posts)
34. I absolutely agree
![]() |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:48 AM
LiberalFighter (45,598 posts)
15. Gibbs Rule 39 -- There is no such thing as coincidence.
Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #15)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:46 AM
mnhtnbb (30,511 posts)
23. LOL! I'm a fan, too.
That's funny. Really.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:56 AM
Blue_Roses (12,894 posts)
16. It was clear to me on election night
nt
|
Response to Blue_Roses (Reply #16)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:03 AM
hamsterjill (14,934 posts)
17. Bingo!!!!
We all know there was wrongdoing that involved Trump and his campaign. We all know that there are Republicans (Nunes, et al) who are trying to keep the wrongdoing from the public.
It WILL come out sooner or later. The question is how much damage will be done before those facts are out and Trump is impeached AND how the country can move forward after that is done. There is also, of course, the question of how far this wrongdoing stretches within the Republican party, etc. But Trump and his hit men (and women) WILL eventually go down. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:17 AM
kag (3,971 posts)
18. Wow, Charles, tell us how you really feel...
To be sure, Donald Trump is a despicable man and an awful president who deserves whatever he gets. He is crude, a liar, a bully and a cheat. He is vainglorious and vengeful.
It is not clear to me that America — and indeed the world — can survive a full-term Trump presidency. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:41 AM
jmg257 (11,996 posts)
22. Figure with all the sources and all the leaking, we would see some hard evidence of collusion
soon. Schiff said there was something a couple weeks ago.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:07 PM
FakeNoose (28,433 posts)
26. Order of succession be damned
... Order of succession is NO REASON to not impeach Trump.
We have to impeach him and there are multiple reasons for that. If Trump's impeachment and eventual removal means the next yoyo is up (Pence) we'll go to work on him too. We'll impeach him if we can because there's a lot evidence that he's in on it too. But don't ever suggest that we can't do THING #1 because THING #2 will happen. If we do that then we might as well tear up the Constitution and start over. ![]() Just sayin' |
Response to FakeNoose (Reply #26)
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 03:52 AM
sprinkleeninow (18,744 posts)
38. Yes to your posit. eom
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 01:20 PM
niyad (98,980 posts)
30. k and r--and the more the orange madman screams and tries to deflect, the more we
know the investigations are on the correct track.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 03:06 PM
harun (11,315 posts)
33. What goes around comes around
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 06:49 PM
SunSeeker (49,140 posts)