HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » NYT: This is not a debata...

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:30 AM

NYT: This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened.

Dwindling Odds of Coincidence
Charles M. Blow APRIL 3, 2017




We are still not conclusively able to connect the dots on the question of whether there was any coordination or collusion between members of Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians who interfered in our election to benefit him, but those dots do continue to multiply at an alarming rate.

First, and we have to keep saying this because this fact keeps getting obscured in the subterfuge of deflection, misdirection and ideological finger-pointing about what has yet to be proven: It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election. This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened.

The investigations, rightly, are seeking to figure out exactly how and to what degree, and those questions obviously depend on knowing more about campaign contacts with Russian meddlers.

................

The journalistic caution in me keeps having to write that these could all be coincidences, but the journalistic instinct has learned long ago that coincidence is the albino alligator of political reality: It exists, but is exceedingly rare.


the rest:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/opinion/dwindling-odds-of-coincidence.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

40 replies, 17988 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 40 replies Author Time Post
Reply NYT: This is not a debatable issue. This is not fake news. This is not a witch hunt. This happened. (Original post)
kpete Apr 2017 OP
Botany Apr 2017 #1
DK504 Apr 2017 #21
Botany Apr 2017 #25
Amaryllis Apr 2017 #36
Name removed Apr 2017 #32
dalton99a Apr 2017 #2
Sunlei Apr 2017 #3
Cary Apr 2017 #4
KittyWampus Apr 2017 #6
gratuitous Apr 2017 #19
Cary Apr 2017 #20
spanone Apr 2017 #5
NRaleighLiberal Apr 2017 #7
Plucketeer Apr 2017 #11
Duppers Apr 2017 #12
gratuitous Apr 2017 #24
Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #40
ffr Apr 2017 #8
Hekate Apr 2017 #29
JTFrog Apr 2017 #9
Paladin Apr 2017 #14
CentralMass Apr 2017 #27
Paladin Apr 2017 #31
Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #10
lark Apr 2017 #13
Skittles Apr 2017 #34
LiberalFighter Apr 2017 #15
mnhtnbb Apr 2017 #23
Blue_Roses Apr 2017 #16
hamsterjill Apr 2017 #17
kag Apr 2017 #18
jmg257 Apr 2017 #22
FakeNoose Apr 2017 #26
sprinkleeninow Apr 2017 #38
Hekate Apr 2017 #28
niyad Apr 2017 #30
harun Apr 2017 #33
SunSeeker Apr 2017 #35
LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #37
AdamJohnson20 Apr 2017 #39

Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:32 AM

1. It is absolutely clear that the Russians did interfere in our election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:41 AM

21. Oh... all those intelligence agencies must be wrong and his is right.

Oh no....there you go again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DK504 (Reply #21)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:07 PM

25. And the Russians left their fingerprints all over the place

Russia was into Wisconsin @ the county level.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/24/russians-suspected-hacking-wisconsin-dems/97023222/

But it is all fake news.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #25)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 08:48 PM

36. I never believed it when they said Russia didnt affect the vote count. They dont just mess with

voter reg databases for fun and stop with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #1)


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:32 AM

2. Kick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 09:52 AM

3. Monday early AM --Donalds first tweet attacks Hillary over the debates. Wheres his Republican Aides?

handlers, republicans, your man needs morning handlers!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:03 AM

4. The burden of proof isn't "conclusive."

In terms of criminal prosecution, it's beyond a reasonable doubt. For our purposes, here, it's far less. In fact I respectfully suggest that WE, THE PEOPLE have an absolute right to know that our president isn't a traitor and the burden of proof is on Trump and his handlers, or whatever they are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cary (Reply #4)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:09 AM

6. Agreed. He refuses to release his taxes, the people have a right to know.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cary (Reply #4)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:25 AM

19. And that's even before an investigation has gotten cranked up

I'd say we're past a preponderance of the evidence, and practically at clear and convincing evidence of Russian meddling. Let's get a full-scale investigation going; are there no Republicans in Congress who value the United States over their party? Who think that hiding away the influence of a hostile foreign government is the path to our nation's destruction? Where are the patriotic Republicans who will aggressively investigate, consequences to their own party be damned?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gratuitous (Reply #19)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:32 AM

20. So, I don't know where we are in terms of proving a particular case

For one thing we don't know what the FBI knows. We only know what has been reported but from what has been reported I think you're correct. There certainly appears to be a growing mountain of evidence of conflicts of interest everywhere and probable impropriety.

Are there any patriotic Republicans? Each and every one of them sold themselves out to opportunism long ago, when they decided that they could make their own reality. All we have, as human beings, are facts and reason. When people will not accept facts and reason then they succumb to evil.

That's ironic, given their claims. But it's true.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:08 AM

5. K&R...👍🏼

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:13 AM

7. only one sane course of action - invalidate the election and have a revote!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:35 AM

11. If only

 

Of course, I'd like to hit the lottery too. I wonder how the odds figure against each other?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:36 AM

12. Absolutely!

Chances of that happening?

The whole election in not valid, not just Trump's presidency.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:07 PM

24. There is NO constitutional mechanism for doing this

Please leave the magical thinking to our Freeperite friends.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #7)

Tue Apr 4, 2017, 06:03 AM

40. That's simply not going to happen.

The more fucked up the situation gets, the more crucial it is to stick to what is actually in the Constitution.

Ditching the constitution would be a tremendously bad idea.

The remedy here is impeachment or resignation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:17 AM

8. His tax returns will have the missing dot.

Which is why he won't release them. Rosneft deal more than likely at the heart of money dealings. When you get a stake of ownership in something without consideration, there are strings attached.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ffr (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:41 PM

29. Since the House Intel Committee is unable, the Senate IC must get them from the IRS now.nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:20 AM

9. "It moves from the zealot Mike Pence, to the weasel Paul Ryan to anti-abortion crusader..."

 

Polls continue to find a strong appetite for the ultimate remedy: Trump’s impeachment. You would get no resistance from me if it ever came to that. But I also understand the order of succession and that, too, gives me pause.

It moves from the zealot Mike Pence, to the weasel Paul Ryan, to anti-abortion crusader Orrin Hatch, to Rex “Russian Order of Friendship” Tillerson, to the former Hollywood producer Steven Mnuchin, who had to apologize last week for plugging “The Lego Batman Movie,” for which he was an executive producer.

The list goes on and on.

Yes, an administration without Trump would be less of an international embarrassment and exceedingly more predictable, but these men have all cozied up to Trump or were picked by him, so there is little daylight among them on policy.

Then there is the brazenly political, callously calculating school of thought — which is as dangerous as it is interesting — that holds that the severe distaste for sitting-President-Trump will likely be the best liberal motivator for success in the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential election. Following this logic, a crippled Trump is better than a vanquished one.


Doesn't seem to be any way we end up but fucked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JTFrog (Reply #9)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:47 AM

14. I'll take sane ideologues over a lunatic, any day. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paladin (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:13 PM

27. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CentralMass (Reply #27)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 01:44 PM

31. They seem to be, right now. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:20 AM

10. facts matter

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:43 AM

13. Charles Blow is a delight as always.

He's a great journalist and captures the present moment, as well as the angst so many are feeling, so well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lark (Reply #13)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 03:23 PM

34. I absolutely agree

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:48 AM

15. Gibbs Rule 39 -- There is no such thing as coincidence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #15)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:46 AM

23. LOL! I'm a fan, too.

That's funny. Really.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:56 AM

16. It was clear to me on election night

nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Roses (Reply #16)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:03 AM

17. Bingo!!!!

We all know there was wrongdoing that involved Trump and his campaign. We all know that there are Republicans (Nunes, et al) who are trying to keep the wrongdoing from the public.

It WILL come out sooner or later. The question is how much damage will be done before those facts are out and Trump is impeached AND how the country can move forward after that is done. There is also, of course, the question of how far this wrongdoing stretches within the Republican party, etc.

But Trump and his hit men (and women) WILL eventually go down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:17 AM

18. Wow, Charles, tell us how you really feel...

To be sure, Donald Trump is a despicable man and an awful president who deserves whatever he gets. He is crude, a liar, a bully and a cheat. He is vainglorious and vengeful.

It is not clear to me that America — and indeed the world — can survive a full-term Trump presidency.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:41 AM

22. Figure with all the sources and all the leaking, we would see some hard evidence of collusion

soon. Schiff said there was something a couple weeks ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:07 PM

26. Order of succession be damned

... Order of succession is NO REASON to not impeach Trump.
We have to impeach him and there are multiple reasons for that.

If Trump's impeachment and eventual removal means the next yoyo is up (Pence) we'll go to work on him too.
We'll impeach him if we can because there's a lot evidence that he's in on it too.

But don't ever suggest that we can't do THING #1 because THING #2 will happen.
If we do that then we might as well tear up the Constitution and start over.



Just sayin'


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FakeNoose (Reply #26)

Tue Apr 4, 2017, 03:52 AM

38. Yes to your posit. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 12:29 PM

28. Kick forever

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 01:20 PM

30. k and r--and the more the orange madman screams and tries to deflect, the more we

know the investigations are on the correct track.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 06:49 PM

35. As Malcolm Nance said, "Coincidence requires a lot of planning." nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:10 PM

37. kick

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Apr 4, 2017, 05:09 AM

39. RE

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread