Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is Rachel Dolezal such a massive, nation-wide story? [View all]XemaSab
(60,212 posts)35. Am I the only one who will cop to genuine interest here?
What does it mean to be black? What does it mean to be white? If someone has a possible drop of black blood, does it give them the "right" to call themselves black? If someone is obviously mostly or entirely white, should they be "forced" to wear that label against their wishes? How much do people have a right to their own identities, and how far can white advocacy really go?
Seems like a lot of people are challenging their own assumptions here, and is that bad? I say no.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
all of that, plus it gives right wingers the chance to ridicule LGBT issues with the silly analogy
fishwax
Jun 2015
#39
Well, this MSNBC viewer appreciated them allowing her to make her case ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2015
#7
Yeah the whole "But she chose to be a woman too" argument is getting old.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#13
I watched it for an hour or two, days ago when it was breaking news
aint_no_life_nowhere
Jun 2015
#15
Post #1 summed it up. It makes the NAACP look bad and validates made up terror stories.
JanMichael
Jun 2015
#16
It's been deemed a sensationally scandal-worthy distraction by our esteemed press. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2015
#36