General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The latest "banning" (NYC_SKP) is an interesting lesson on REPUTATION. [View all]CaliforniaPeggy
(149,639 posts)I was Juror #3.
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sat Jun 6, 2015, 12:33 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I have been smeared by them as being a misogynist.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6787473
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
"Normal women"-- would it be acceptable to refer to any other group as normal, just because you prefer their tone and don't make you want to "keep punching back?" Just all around inappropriate.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jun 6, 2015, 12:42 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the alerter is way off base. I agree with Bonobo. This post is fine; Leave it alone.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: "Normal women"? Someone want to define that for me?
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: it is an opinion - not one I agree with but just an opinion
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't see the problem Leave it.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This doesn't seem like a logical alert to me. More like alert trolling by force of habit.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.