Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary Clinton’s Soft Populism Is Not Enough [View all]
http://www.thenation.com/blog/204041/hillary-clintons-soft-populism-not-enoughFull article at link above, just an excerpt:
The Democratic nominee in 2016 has to propose a specific populism that recognizes the failure of free-trade deals such as NAFTA and join Elizabeth Warren in rejecting proposals to Fast Track a Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement that critics warns will be NAFTA on steroids. The Democratic nominee has to recognize that the Dodd-Frank reforms were insufficient and that Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown is right when he proposes to break up too-big-to-fail banks. The Democratic nominee must recognize the need to raise new revenues, as Congressman Keith Ellison has with his proposal for a Robin Hood Tax on financial speculation. The Democratic nominee must, as Congresswoman Barbara Lee does, recognize the need to steer money away from bloated Pentagon budgets and toward meeting human needs. The Democratic nominee must, as Bernie Sanders does, recognize the absolute necessity of massive federal investments in infrastructure and programs that create and sustain living-wage jobs.
How about it, HRC? We want progressive values & action, let's start on TPP this week. The American people need a champion.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
35 replies, 2711 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (38)
ReplyReply to this post
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, if she's going to champion all of the people, that includes the banksters, insurance CEO's,
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#3
It's pretty scarey knowing that some elections get by without even addressing issues, I think a
mother earth
Apr 2015
#17
Really? Maybe a Stand with Sanders sign would be better, but perhaps HRC will take
mother earth
Apr 2015
#18
so far, you think there will be NO one vying for the democratic nomination? Rand Paul is
mother earth
Apr 2015
#21
I'm looking forward to hearing those answers. I'd love nothing more than to see a true people's
mother earth
Apr 2015
#24
If we had anything close to a Democracy, candidates wouldn't have to grovel for contributions.
YOHABLO
Apr 2015
#19
I seriously agree! There needs to be campaign finance reform, it is absolutely ridiculous to
mother earth
Apr 2015
#22
You have this a bit backwards, our support is dictated by her direction and stances, the alternative
mother earth
Apr 2015
#27