Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie's campaign site is up and running. I signed up to volunteer! [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)100. Nice selective editing, but you do realize that only unions practice "liberal corporatism"
A concept of corporatism that is not embraced by the third way political philosophy. The multinationals that are writing Hillary's views on free trade follow a vision much more akin to "Italian Corporatism"
Your post reminds me of the fascist apologia of the early thirties best expressed by the 1932
"Doctrine of Fascism"
When brought within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State.[36]...
[The state] is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual... Neither has the Fascist conception of authority anything in common with that of a police ridden State... Far from crushing the individual, the Fascist State multiplies his energies, just as in a regiment a soldier is not diminished but multiplied by the number of his fellow soldiers.
[The state] is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual... Neither has the Fascist conception of authority anything in common with that of a police ridden State... Far from crushing the individual, the Fascist State multiplies his energies, just as in a regiment a soldier is not diminished but multiplied by the number of his fellow soldiers.
Taking the word corporatism completely out of context of modern use to imply it is something it is not, reveals you to be full of something often found on barn floors that must be cleaned from time to time.
Another cute misrepresentation of yours is your implication that neo-liberalism "doesn't really mean anything", when in fact it has a very clear meaning in it's modern usage:
Neoliberalism[1] is the resurgence of ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism beginning in the 1970s and 1980s,[2][3][4] whose advocates support extensive economic liberalization, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to enhance the role of the private sector in the economy.[5][6][7][8] The usage and definition of the term have changed over time.[7]
Originally neoliberalism was an economic philosophy that emerged among European liberal scholars in the 1930s attempting to trace a so-called Third or Middle Way between the conflicting philosophies of classical liberalism and collectivist central planning.[9] The impetus for this development arose from a desire to avoid repeating the economic failures of the early 1930s, which were mostly blamed on the economic policy of classical liberalism. In the decades that followed, the use of the term neoliberal tended to refer to theories at variance with the more laissez-faire doctrine of classical liberalism and promoted instead a market economy under the guidance and rules of a strong state, a model which came to be known as the social market economy.
In the 1960s, usage of the term "neoliberal" heavily declined. When the term was reintroduced in the 1980s in connection with Augusto Pinochets economic reforms in Chile, the usage of the term had shifted. It had not only become a term with negative connotations employed principally by critics of market reform, but it also had shifted in meaning from a moderate form of liberalism to a more radical and laissez-faire capitalist set of ideas. Scholars now tended to associate it with the theories of economists Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman.[7] Once the new meaning of neoliberalism was established as a common usage among Spanish-speaking scholars, it diffused directly into the English-language study of political economy.[7]
Neoliberalism also represents a set of ideas that are famously associated with the economic policies introduced by Margaret Thatcher in the United Kingdom and Ronald Reagan in the United States.[2]
Originally neoliberalism was an economic philosophy that emerged among European liberal scholars in the 1930s attempting to trace a so-called Third or Middle Way between the conflicting philosophies of classical liberalism and collectivist central planning.[9] The impetus for this development arose from a desire to avoid repeating the economic failures of the early 1930s, which were mostly blamed on the economic policy of classical liberalism. In the decades that followed, the use of the term neoliberal tended to refer to theories at variance with the more laissez-faire doctrine of classical liberalism and promoted instead a market economy under the guidance and rules of a strong state, a model which came to be known as the social market economy.
In the 1960s, usage of the term "neoliberal" heavily declined. When the term was reintroduced in the 1980s in connection with Augusto Pinochets economic reforms in Chile, the usage of the term had shifted. It had not only become a term with negative connotations employed principally by critics of market reform, but it also had shifted in meaning from a moderate form of liberalism to a more radical and laissez-faire capitalist set of ideas. Scholars now tended to associate it with the theories of economists Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman.[7] Once the new meaning of neoliberalism was established as a common usage among Spanish-speaking scholars, it diffused directly into the English-language study of political economy.[7]
Neoliberalism also represents a set of ideas that are famously associated with the economic policies introduced by Margaret Thatcher in the United Kingdom and Ronald Reagan in the United States.[2]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thanks for posting this. I receive his emails but have not received this info.
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#2
I don't want to scare you, but BERNIESANDERS.COM is registered in Panama....
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#4
I guess then... I don't understand the DU love affair and congratulatory posts...
Sheepshank
Mar 2015
#25
Yes another day and another trumped up outrage. I would say that Sen Sanders
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#53
Maybe I can help you understand. There are a lot of Democratic folks that don't like to be
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#36
Why are some so afraid of someone progressive running against the corporatist's choice?
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#56
I don't think anyone is "afraid", it's just that most here (hopefully) are Democrats and...
George II
Mar 2015
#67
I appreciate being able to respond to your post. Progressives love Sen Sanders
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#71
How so? I haven't made any assumptions (or presumptions) about your background, have I?
George II
Mar 2015
#109
People fling around the catchwords "corporatist" and "corporatism" like the red-baiters...
George II
Mar 2015
#88
I was born in Brooklyn and have lived within 75 miles of NYC my entire life, so STFU!
George II
Mar 2015
#97
Nice selective editing, but you do realize that only unions practice "liberal corporatism"
Dragonfli
Mar 2015
#100
You are wrong, it means what it means, the meaning has been shown to you - twice
Dragonfli
Mar 2015
#129
A rich wannabe kingmaker is so concerned about us poor POOR folk, bless his kind heart. /nt
Dragonfli
Mar 2015
#63
Nah..they'll focus their bogus nasty stuff at Hillary Clinton, as usual. n/t
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#27
Yes it is. It is associated with "Friends of Bernie" which is his campaign group.
tracks29
Mar 2015
#14
...for his Senate campaign. A Presidential campaign will need to be registered with the FEC...
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#21
At the bottom of the page below, it says "Paid for by Friends of Bernie Sanders".
greatauntoftriplets
Mar 2015
#15
Nice disinformation campaign you got going there, but you demand people be nice about HRC.
Rex
Mar 2015
#32
Why must you be so sensible and pragmatic? Sheesh, you forgot this was "Democratic Underground"?
George II
Mar 2015
#68
I must say, I never thought of Elizabeth Warren and Alan Grayson as "purchasable....."
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#72
You are focusing on bundling money for Warren and Sanders if they run in 2016?
Dragonfli
Mar 2015
#127
It was amazingly obvious to me = never mentioned the office although there was a vague comment...
George II
Mar 2015
#61
That's adorable. I thought his fans wanted him to actually have the Democratic Party nominate him.
Hekate
Mar 2015
#96
I thought the idea was to have him nominated by the Democratic Party. He's a nice man, but ...
Hekate
Mar 2015
#99
When Sanders formally announces for president, repost the site, and make it all nice and official
dissentient
Mar 2015
#58
People are already showing their true colors. The Populist Movement is here and the
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#91