Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
13. lol. you don't know your history. 'revisionist' is people who pretend slavery = only the south.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 12:48 AM
Feb 2013

"The effects of the New England slave trade were momentous. It was one of the foundations of New England's economic structure; it created a wealthy class of slave-trading merchants, while the profits derived from this commerce stimulated cultural development and philanthropy."

--Lorenzo Johnston Greene, “The Negro in Colonial New England, 1620-1776,” p.319.

Whether it was officially encouraged, as in New York and New Jersey, or not, as in Pennsylvania, the slave trade flourished in colonial Northern ports. But New England was by far the leading slave merchant of the American colonies.

The first systematic venture from New England to Africa was undertaken in 1644 by an association of Boston traders...

Boston and Newport were the chief slave ports, but nearly all the New England towns -- Salem, Providence, Middletown, New London – had a hand in it. In 1740, slaving interests in Newport owned or managed 150 vessels engaged in all manner of trading. In Rhode Island colony, as much as two-thirds of the merchant fleet and a similar fraction of sailors were engaged in slave traffic. The colonial governments of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania all, at various times, derived money from the slave trade by levying duties on black imports. Tariffs on slave import in Rhode Island in 1717 and 1729 were used to repair roads and bridges.

http://www.slavenorth.com/profits.htm

Emily Dickinson's family lived on slave profits. Ralph Waldo Emerson, ditto.

Scratch a Northen culture-hero, you're likely to find slavery lurking off-stage.

I still think slavery is the original sin. senseandsensibility Feb 2013 #1
Slavery is the ultimate cheap powerless labor DBoon Feb 2013 #2
If Slavery IS the Original Sin, bvar22 Feb 2013 #3
Yes, they've made an adjustment to have to pay some minimal wages CanonRay Feb 2013 #30
I believe it Canuckistanian Feb 2013 #4
Hmmm... moondust Feb 2013 #5
This is not so much a figment of the South anymore Major Nikon Feb 2013 #6
It is no coincidence that the South had the lowest percentage of union representation. alarimer Feb 2013 #7
what? HiPointDem Feb 2013 #8
Funny thing is the article you link to doesn't support what you wrote. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2013 #9
child labor wasn't any better in the us than in england, and everything i wrote is true. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #11
Sorry buddy I don't buy your revisionist BS Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2013 #12
lol. you don't know your history. 'revisionist' is people who pretend slavery = only the south. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #13
Dude you haven't supported your argument. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2013 #14
dude, you can start your education with the link in the post you just responded to. here it is HiPointDem Feb 2013 #15
here's another: HiPointDem Feb 2013 #16
Thank you HPD pecwae Feb 2013 #18
Much appreciated, HiPointDem cordelia Feb 2013 #19
I had the same reaction as you - lynne Feb 2013 #20
Thank you! You are absolutely correct. It's remarkable how many people just don't know..... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #21
link looks interesting; thanks! real american history is way more interesting and educational HiPointDem Feb 2013 #25
Thank you for an informative series of posts on this important topic. n/t Laelth Feb 2013 #28
I tell that to my two kids every time they have a test in what they now call "Social Studies".... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #29
Dude you still haven't proven your point. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2013 #38
you seem to think my point is "the north had slaves too." but my point is that slave-trade HiPointDem Feb 2013 #40
and this Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #22
I read the Jungle in 9th grade. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2013 #39
And Snyder & gang is trying to bring that model to MI. I can see the "Pure Michigan" catbyte Feb 2013 #10
Mammon Vs. America Berlum Feb 2013 #17
There was an interesting AlterNet article on a similar subject back in June 2012 LongTomH Feb 2013 #23
the reforms came largely because 1) elite northern abolitionists had already made their nut & HiPointDem Feb 2013 #27
It still is ... ananda Feb 2013 #24
Excellent eaasy. k&r n/t Laelth Feb 2013 #26
Interesting paragraph from the article. Laelth Feb 2013 #31
+1 HiPointDem Feb 2013 #32
Chiquola Mills, Honea Path, SC, 1934. . . DinahMoeHum Feb 2013 #33
Excellent essay. Thanks for this post. n/t Laelth Feb 2013 #34
Then maybe we over here on our side should consider the following: Volaris Feb 2013 #35
Not much has changed when you think about it, they're still using race as class divider SpartanDem Feb 2013 #36
It is like this guy is reading my university history papers Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Salon: The “original sin”...»Reply #13