TeddyR
TeddyR's JournalStats on police killings
WaPo article that indicates most police killings involved armed criminals, the mentally ill or those who attempted to run from the police.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/12/26/a-year-of-reckoning-police-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000/
Assault Weapons Bans Have No Impact On Crime
Two opinion pieces that explain why assault weapons bans are fairly pointless. The first, a piece from a week ago from a liberal proponent of gun control and titled "Why banning assault rifles won't reduce gun violence," explains that an assault weapons ban will have no impact on gun crime. The second, from a Second Amendment proponent and titled "Why are gun rights supporters worried about bans on so-called assault weapons?," agrees and goes on to explain why those who oppose such bans are suspicious of them. I thought these were both very interesting reads. Thought about posting in GD but wasn't sure this discussion was appropriate there.
From the LA Times:
Yet we already know that banning assault weapons won't reduce gun crime or deaths. Worse, the bans may make it harder to enact more effective gun control laws.
The problem starts with the term itself. The assault weapons for sale in the U.S. now aren't really weapons of war. Many people mistake these firearms for machine guns capable of shooting multiple rounds of ammunition with a single pull of the trigger. The federal government banned the sale of machine guns to civilians in 1986. (The National Rifle Assn. likes to claim that gun laws never work, but the machine gun ban has worked just fine. Such guns are almost never used in criminal activity, and none of the recent mass shootings in the U.S. involved a machine gun. The San Bernardino terrorists tried to modify one of their guns to turn it into a machine gun.)
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-winkler-folly-of-assault-weapon-ban-20151211-story.html
From the Washington Post:
Assault weapons arent fully automatic; they are semiautomatics, like many tens of millions of other guns out there. They arent unusually powerful assault rifles are generally more powerful than handguns, because generally rifles are more powerful than handguns, but many ordinary hunting rifles (such as a .30-06) are more powerful than many assault weapons (such as the .223s that were used in the San Bernardino, Calif., shooting). The features that are often used to distinguish them, such as bayonet lugs, barrel shrouds, and pistol grips, dont actually make them materially deadlier. (Magazine size may be relevant to deadliness, though its not clear that magazine size limits are a good idea; but in any event, magazine capacity is a separate matter from assault weapons bans as such, since large magazines can fit all sorts of guns.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/12/16/why-are-gun-rights-supporters-worried-about-bans-on-so-called-assault-weapons-bans/
Teen Who Provided Access To Loaded, Unsecured Gun Used To Kill Toddler Given 1 Year Probation
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/teen-who-provided-gun-used-to-kill-3-year-old-girl-put-on-years-probation/2015/12/11/9492da32-a035-11e5-a3c5-c77f2cc5a43c_story.html?hpid=hp_local-news_cox-338p%3Ahomepage%2FstoryThought I would gauge the sentiments of those on DU for this story. A lot of people want stricter gun control, a lot want to enforce the laws already on the books, etc. In this case, a 17 year old in DC - who was not permitted to own a gun under DC law - left a 9MM handgun he "found" unsecured in his apartment and a 7 year old found the gun and shot and killed a 3 year old with it. The 17 year old was sentenced to 1 year probation. I've seen some post that those who use a gun during a crime should be sentenced to life in prison. What about this 17 year old? Is a year's probation sufficient for leaving unsecured a gun used to kill a child?
As she described the aftermath of the July 29 shooting of Dalis Cox, local prosecutor Kristi Brownings voice quavered. She told the judge that the boy had told detectives that he was surprised his little sister had been killed.
He said he didnt know that would happen. He said guns on TV dont do that, Browning told the judge. There was a break between reality and TV.
The emotional disclosure came during the final hearing in a case that has left a community grieving a toddlers death and officials and community leaders questioning how a gun could get into the hands of a child.
After the hearing, Browning said authorities considered the 7-year-old a victim as well.
But prosecutors did charge a 17-year-old male who admitted to bringing the loaded 9mm Glock pistol to the boys apartment. Inside the apartment, the 7-year-old found the gun in a bag and began playing with it. The boy fired the weapon, and a bullet struck his sister in the chest. The childrens mother was in another part of the apartment at the time.
Senate Refuses to Act on Modest Gun Control Measures
The senate couldn't even get enough votes yesterday to add modest gun control measures (like UBCs) to a Republican bill. In other words, nothing is going to get done. There are some overwhelmingly popular proposals, like UBCs, and I really cannot understand why those aren't getting passed, other than that our elected representatives are failing to do what we hired them to do and are instead cowing to the NRA. On the other hand, there are some states where gun control is a losing issue. Heidi Heitkamp (D - ND) voted against yesterday's gun control proposals. I don't imagine gun control is particularly popular in North Dakota, and her grip on her seat probably too tenuous to survive a vote in favor of gun control.
From the article:
The Senate rejected a measure from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to expand background checks for guns purchased online and at gun shows on a 48 to 50 vote and an amendment from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to prevent individuals on the terror watch list from purchasing firearms on a 45 to 54 vote. The amendments were offered to an Obamacare repeal package currently being debated in the Senate and they needed 60 votes to be adopted.
Feinsteins amendment was identical to legislation she previously filed on the same topic, while the expansion of background checks for gun purchases mirrored language championed by Sens. Manchin and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) in 2013, following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School three years ago this month.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/12/03/senate-democrats-to-force-gun-control-votes-in-the-wake-of-the-san-bernardino-shooting/?hpid=hp_regional-hp-cards_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fcard
Citing shootings, NY sheriff urges citizens to carry guns
Despite all the rhetoric on here about seizing guns, and all the juvenile name-calling by those who would confiscate guns, confiscation is a decidedly minority position that will never happen. In any event, the sheriff in Ulster County, NY, an elected Democrat, "is urging residents of his county who are licensed gun owners to arm themselves when they leave home, citing recent mass shootings in the United States and Paris." In other words, that sheriff thinks it is a good idea for citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights. From the article:
The post quickly drew hundreds of comments, for and against it.
"I'm not trying to drum up a militia of any sort," Van Blarcum told The Associated Press on Thursday. "It's just a reminder that if you want to, you have a right to carry it. It might come in handy. It's better to have it than not have it. We're partners with the public in crime prevention."
The largely rural county in the Catskill Mountains about two hours north of New York City has 10,000 licensed handgun owners, Van Blarcum said.
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6158482-citing-shootings-ny-sheriff-urges-citizens-to-carry-guns/
WaPo Article Contends "Zero" Correlation Between State Gun Laws and State Homicide Rates
The WaPo has had a number of articles relating to gun control/violence since the shooting in Oregon. Eugene Volokh, a law professor at UCLA, had an opinion piece today in which he contends there is "zero correlation between state homicide rate and state gun laws." The article can be found here - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/10/06/zero-correlation-between-state-homicide-rate-and-state-gun-laws/.
He explains that his methodology examines whether states with more stringent gun laws have lower overall homicide rates -- not just gun homicides, but total homicides -- because if you enact strict gun laws and just see a rise in knife murders then you've not really made an overall difference. Anyway, I'm sure that this article won't sway one side or the other but found it interesting and the conclusion unsurprising.
He concludes:
WaPo Fact Checks President's Claim That States With Most Gun Laws Tend To Have Fewest Gun Deaths
Washington Post fact checkers give two Pinocchio's to President Obama's claim that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths, which means the statement included "significant omissions and/or exaggerations," although the author notes he waivered between two and three Pinocchio's, with three being in the "mostly false" category. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2015/10/05/obamas-claim-that-states-with-the-most-gun-laws-tend-to-have-the-fewest-gun-deaths/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b
In the article the WaPo explains that when you exclude suicides, which account for 60% of gun deaths, then there is a significant change in where a state might rank in the number of gun deaths per 100,000 people.
First, the WaPo notes that the data is "mixed" on whether stricter gun laws lead to fewer suicides:
Japan, for instance, has among the worlds most-restrictive gun-control regimes and yet also has among the worlds highest suicide rates, almost double the U.S. suicide rate.
Second, once you exclude suicides:
Meanwhile, Maryland a more urban state fell from 15th place to 45th, even though it has very tough gun laws. Illinois dropped from 11th place to 38th, and New York fell from 3rd to 15th.
The WaPo concluded that:
In short, I, along with almost all of the people on DU, support toughening our gun laws to include UBCs and additional training. But stricter gun laws isn't the panacea it is made out to be, and in some states -- notably Maryland -- such laws have had little impact on gun violence.
District of Columbia
Continues to lose in court with respect to its draconian and unconstitutional gun laws.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/us-appeals-court-strikes-down-one-gun-a-month-law-in-district/2015/09/18/137fa290-5e22-11e5-8e9e-dce8a2a2a679_story.html
In a 2-1 ruling, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for D.C. knocked down several provisions of the Districts Firearms Amendment Act of 2012, including requirements that gun owners re-register weapons every three years, bring their firearm with them to be registered and pass a knowledge test of local laws.
Writing for the court, U.S. Circuit Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, a Reagan appointee, said the District governments claim that limiting residents to registering one pistol every 30 days promotes public safety by reducing the number of guns on the street, does not justify restricting an individuals undoubted constitutional right to keep arms (plural) in his or her home.
He continued, Taken to its logical conclusion, that reasoning would justify a total ban on firearms kept in the home.
Interesting story from the WaPo
That supports the argument (even if they didn't intend to) that the problem isn't guns, the problem is felons with guns.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/how-dc-police-seized-nine-illegal-guns-on-one-of-the-citys-most-violent-nights/2015/09/05/e9078ff0-5269-11e5-8c19-0b6825aa4a3a_story.html
Of the nine guns seized, the vast majority were in the hands of convicted felons who were barred from owning a firearm. And Police Chief Lanier made the interesting comment that
There is a small number of repeat violent gun offenders who commit violent crime after violent crime after violent crime, and they are not spending any time in jail, Lanier said.
This is an interesting article from the Washington Post
Regarding expanding Second Amendment rights. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/07/20/a-survey-of-legislative-action-on-second-amendment-issues-in-2015/
Profile Information
Name: SeanGender: Male
Hometown: Asheville NC
Home country: USA
Current location: Arlington VA
Member since: Sat Jun 27, 2015, 02:01 PM
Number of posts: 2,493