Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

yallerdawg's Journal
yallerdawg's Journal
August 13, 2016

"Mr. Robot" and the rabbit hole. Helpful *spoilers*?

"Mr. Robot isn't a TV show anymore. It's a video game."

Source: The Week, Lili Loufbourow

A critique:

Mr. Robot is in trouble with some viewers because its second season has been exceptionally slow. The Season 1 finale raised huge philosophical questions about the collapse of capitalism, the moral case for and against hacking, and the ways corporations might or might not be colluding with foreign powers to permanently change the world order. These are big issues and they require a big world. In lieu of advancing these plots, the second season has proliferated film and TV references, nostalgic riffs, and Elliot's efforts to fight Mr. Robot. If you're watching for the hacking, or the societal collapse, or the politics, or the philosophy, that sucks. Mr. Robot started on a gigantic canvas and so far the only part of it that's shaded in and detailed (almost to the point of absurdity) is Elliot's tortured inner life.

A revelation:

And it's this interactivity, that pleasant, ticklish, paranoid feeling that everything is connected, makes the show massively fun to consume. I found myself staring at the ads before and after the show, trying to figure out what was and wasn't part of Mr. Robot's universe, which had already transgressed by tweaking the sacred rules of the network time slot, and has now started messing with commercials too. Mr. Robot's fake E Corp ads were stylistically indistinguishable from USA's '90s ads.

That's FUN. More absorbing than the plot or the suspense or even the great cinematography is the show's friendly invitation to detect. People are scouring every frame for codes and secrets and (unlike in True Detective, which inspired a similar frenzy of paranoid readings) they're actually there.

An example:

If you keep your eyes peeled for IP addresses (they pop up in the unlikeliest places, like freeway signs), they might lead you to a BBS called TV TODAY where you can type in commands to see ANSI art of ALF or Bart Simpson and read bulletin boards about Doogie Howser, The Simpsons, The Fresh Prince of Bel Air, Full House, Step by Step, Head of the Class, Dear John, and The Cosby Show. If you want to see some other things in the BBS, try typing in the following commands: A P B P A P B. One of the images there...




...is on Angela's desk...




...in the episode. And hey: if you want to look up what "MARBLECAKE" means, that's up to you.

Much more at: http://theweek.com/articles/642386/mr-robot-isnt-tv-show-anymore-video-game



August 13, 2016

Donald Trump knows exactly what he's doing

Source: The Week, by Paul Waldman

So it was when Donald Trump decided a couple of days ago to say, "ISIS is honoring President Obama. He is the founder of ISIS. He is the founder of ISIS. He's the founder. He founded ISIS." It's so ludicrous that we don't actually need to assess the accuracy of the claim, right?

As an informed person, upon hearing this you probably said, "Oh, well Trump just means that by pulling out of Iraq, Obama helped create a situation which enabled ISIS to evolve out of a pre-existing radical terrorist group. He's not literally saying Obama founded the group, just that his decisions eventually led to their rise." But you'd be wrong, because conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt tried to give Trump that out, and Trump declined to take it. "I know what you meant. You meant that he created the vacuum, he lost the peace," Hewitt said when he had Trump on his show Thursday. "No, I meant he's the founder of ISIS. I do," Trump responded. "But he's not sympathetic to them. He hates them. He's trying to kill them," Hewitt replied. "I don't care," said Trump. "He was the founder."

To paraphrase Marco Rubio, don't think Donald Trump doesn't know what he's doing — he knows exactly what he's doing. In the same speech, Trump pointedly referred to "Barack Hussein Obama," just in case anyone forgot that the president isn't really one of us. Trump, of course, launched an effort in 2011 to prove once and for all that Obama is a foreigner who was not actually born in the United States, but what you may not realize is that to this day Trump has never admitted that the president is, in fact, an American.

And he's got a lot of company. You might have thought the lunatic conspiracy theory about Obama actually being born abroad and falsifying his birth records would have been relegated by now to a tiny fringe. Alas, it is not. An NBC/Survey Monkey poll taken just this week showed that only 27 percent of Republicans think Obama was born in the United States. Twenty-seven percent.

Read it at: http://theweek.com/articles/642393/donald-trump-knows-exactly-what-hes-doing
August 13, 2016

Intern Q&A with the President

"Becoming President involves a lot of luck...But being useful, and having a satisfying life, and making a contribution, that is entirely within your reach."

August 13, 2016

Bill Clinton Calls Comey's Statement On Email Classification “Biggest Load Of Bull I’ve Ever Heard”



We saw what you did there, Mr. "Above Partisanship" Comey ( )

True or false - ALL Republicans lie?

True -- they ALL do!

August 12, 2016

Something we may have noticed before?

Among many positive indicators in this poll, a familiar little tidbit.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-08-10/bloomberg-politics-national-poll

Clinton’s voters are more positive about her candidacy than those backing Trump are about his, with 56 percent saying their alignment with her is more an act of support than to stop Trump. His fans, meanwhile, are more motivated by their disdain for her, with 56 percent saying their backing of Trump is more a vote against her than support for him.
August 11, 2016

This Supreme Court decision poisoned our campaign finance system

Fundraising email from Hillary campaign:

<name>,

Almost a decade ago, I learned that a film called “Hillary: The Movie” was being released by a conservative group called Citizens United. It took aim at me and other progressives. What we didn’t know at the time was how much damage this 90-minute film would do to our country -- because the movie set in motion a legal roller coaster that affected our entire democracy.

Citizens United -- a special interest group -- argued that the First Amendment protected their right to spend unlimited money to influence the outcome of elections. The case made its way to the Supreme Court. And on January 21, 2010, the Court handed down its landmark ruling, "Citizens United v. FEC," clearing the way for special interest groups to bankroll campaigns.

In the years since, we’ve seen the aftermath of that decision. Let’s be frank: that ruling has perverted and poisoned our campaign finance system. It has stifled the voices of ordinary Americans. Instead, it has amplified the opinions and interests of corporations and billionaires.

<name>, I used to teach law students -- and nowhere in the Constitution does it say that corporations and wealthy special interests have the right to control our elections. A Fortune 500 CEO should not have more sway ​over an election than an elementary school teacher.

That’s why, as your president, I will work tirelessly to put in place a constitutional amendment reversing that Supreme Court decision. I'll put that process in motion within the first month of my tenure in the Oval Office.

But I need your help to get there.

We cannot have people like the Koch brothers buying our elections. We need to work as hard as we can, for as long as we must, to protect the sanctity -- and transparency -- of our democratic process.

You understand that. And that’s part of the reason I’m so honored to have End Citizens United’s endorsement. You know the power of a grassroots movement. And you get that our foremothers and forefathers would be sick at the thought that -- in 2016! -- a few players at the top of the pyramid hold so much of our nation’s political power.

Our opponent in this election is on the side of the billionaires. Can you chip in $X now to my campaign and help me transform our broken campaign finance system?

Thank you for standing with me.

As your president, I promise -- I'll stand with you, too.

Hillary

August 11, 2016

Recreational closing of Bankhead Tunnel planned for Saturday

Way too cool!

Bankhead Tunnel is the original tunnel under the Mobile River/Ship Channel, before I-10 and the George Wallace tunnel. How many people have driven through this, and now you can walk it, bike it, skate it, skateboard it?


Pedestrians, cyclists and other recreational users will get another crack at the Bankhead Tunnel this Saturday, according to the Alabama Department of Transportation, which continues to fine-tune the formula for such events.

ALDOT announced early Wednesday via Twitter that it plans another recreational closing for 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. on Saturday, Aug. 13. Referencing a rainy forecast, the tweet cautioned that "we will continue to monitor weather & inform you of any changes."

Such closings have been conducted on a trial basis in recent weeks, and have grown from an initial small turnout in the 150-person range. On July 30, ALDOT said 1,089 people had taken part, topped by a count of about 1,200 on Aug. 6.


Updates on tunnel closings: https://twitter.com/ALDOTMobileArea



http://www.al.com/news/mobile/index.ssf/2016/08/recreational_closing_of_bankhe.html


August 11, 2016

Why is recovery taking so long—and who’s to blame?

Blame austerity, not Obama, for slow economic recovery! HuffPo

Source: Economic Policy Institute, by Josh Bivens

Introduction and key findings

This fall’s presidential campaign will offer conflicting narratives about how the U.S. economy is faring and how well incumbent policymakers have managed the recovery from the Great Recession. But we already know the story. We are enduring one of the slowest economic recoveries in recent history, and the pace can be entirely explained by the fiscal austerity, particularly with regard to spending, imposed by Republican policymakers, members of Congress primarily but also legislators and governors at the state level. Key findings of this brief are:

- Since the recovery’s trough in June 2009, employment took longer (51 months) to reach its pre-recession peak than in any other of the previous three recoveries. Much of this too-slow march back to the pre-recession employment peak can be attributed to the length and severity of the Great Recession itself—the economy had a much larger hole to dig out of. But the pace of job growth in the recovery phase following the recession was also slow relative to previous recoveries—slower than any on record except the recovery in the early 2000s. At the trough of the Great Recession the economy was more damaged than at the trough of any postwar business cycle; only the 1982 trough was comparable.

- The ability of conventional monetary policy to spur recovery following the Great Recession was more limited than in any other postwar recovery.

- Given the degree of damage inflicted by the Great Recession and the restricted ability of monetary policy to aid recovery, historically expansionary fiscal policy was required to return the U.S. economy to full health. But this government spending not only failed to rise fast enough to spur a rapid recovery, it outright contracted, and this policy choice fully explains why the economy is only partially recovered from the Great Recession a full seven years after its official end.

Read it all at: http://www.epi.org/publication/why-is-recovery-taking-so-long-and-who-is-to-blame/

August 10, 2016

Blue Cross proposes rate hike of nearly 40 percent on some Obamacare plans

Doesn't this also establish a 40% increase in profit across the board?

Source: al.com, Amy Yurkanin

The proposed rate hikes will affect more than 160,000 people in Alabama who purchase insurance through the federal exchange, or about 5 percent of Blue Cross membership.

Rate increases range from 26 to 41 percent, depending on the type of plan. Proposed increases are lowest for bronze plans, which offer the least amount of coverage, and greatest for the most popular silver plans.

The hefty rate hikes for Blue Cross customers will come on the heels of another increase in 2016 that averaged 28 percent for individual plans. The company lost more than $250 million on marketplace plans from 2014 to 2016, according to Blue Cross executives.

The high costs of individual marketplace customers in Alabama also factored into the departures of UnitedHealth and Humana, according to statements by those companies.

Read it all and a couple thousand comments at:

http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/08/blue_cross_proposes_rate_hike_1.html#incart_most-readnews

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Member since: Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:21 PM
Number of posts: 16,104
Latest Discussions»yallerdawg's Journal