cleanhippie
cleanhippie's JournalApparently, asking "Is it immoral to rape a Skepchick" is now discussion of theological issue.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/121836983Which links to a page with nothing but the question "Is it immoral to rape a Skepchick?"
Yep, folks, DU's religion forum has officially been turned over to the inmates. There is even a group host participating in the thread.
I think it's time to make it official that DU now sucks more.
Now to lighten the mood: The 11 Most Unintentionally Hilarious Religious Paintings
It's really easy to get this kind of painting wrong. Terribly, hilariously wrong.
Read more: The 11 Most Unintentionally Hilarious Religious Paintings | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article_19947_the-11-most-unintentionally-hilarious-religious-paintings.html#ixzz21P7x5hha
#11. The Introduction by Nathan Greene
#10. The Undefeated by Stephen Sawyer
#8. Calvary by Stephen Sawyer
?v=1
#7. No Appointment Necessary by Stephen Sawyer
?v=1
#4. How to Recognize Jesus by Consuelo Udave
#3. Via Dolorosa by Jon McNaughton
#2. One Nation Under God by Jon McNaughton
#1. The Difficult Case by Nathan Greene
?v=1
Catholic Church loses child sex abuse liability appeal
Last year Mr Justice MacDuff decided in favour of a woman, now 47, who claimed she was raped and assaulted as a child by a priest of the Portsmouth Diocese.
The Court of Appeal has upheld this decision, which raises "an issue of wide general importance in respect of claims against the Catholic Church".
A diocese spokesman said the case was about "fundamental legal principles".
More at link... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-18278529
And guess who is really gonna pay for this? Those who fill the seats and the coffers.
Evangelical Leader: Only Christian Victims Of Colorado Shooting Going To Heaven
I can't help but feel that to some extent, we're reaping what we've been sowing as a society. We said to God, "Get out of the public arena." Lawsuit after lawsuit, often by misguided "civil libertarians," have chased away any fear of God in the land -- at least in the hearts of millions.
Newcombes is not alone in reacting this way to the shooting in Aurora that claimed 12 deaths and left dozens of injuries. On the day of the shooting Rep. Gohmert of Texas also insisted that the shootings are the result of "ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian Beliefs":
"People say ... where was God in all of this? We've threatened high school graduation participations, if they use God's name, they're going to be jailed ... I mean that kind of stuff. Where was God? What have we done with God? We don't want him around. I kind of like his protective hand being present."
Perhaps more disturbing were Newcombes comments when on a segment on the American Family Association radio dedicated to understanding the shooting tragedy in Colorado. In taking about the deaths, Newcombe separated the afterlife fate of those who died as Christians and those who did not:
If a Christian dies early, if a Christian dies young, it seems tragic, but really it is not tragic because they are going to a wonderful place.. on the other hand, if a person doesnt know Jesus Christ.. if they knowingly rejected Jesus Christ, then, basically, they are going to a terrible place.
Newcombe then turned the tragedy into a time for people to become Christian and avoid the similar fate of hell:
For those who are not in Christ and see this incredible tragedy, this would be a good time for soul reflection and consider why have you not accepted Jesus Christ.. I would urge anyone who is not in Christ to repent of your sins.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/22/jerry-newcombe-hell_n_1692859.html
Religion Cut Off Her Nose, Science Put It Back On. (Warning: Graphic Image)
Three cheers for science!!
Hip hip, Hooray!
Hip hip, Hooray!
Hip hip, Hooray!
The smile that defies the Taliban: Afghan teenager whose mutilated face shocked the world unveils her new image
An Afghan teenager who was horribly mutilated by her husband under Taliban rule was all smiles as she unveiled her new prosthetic nose for the first time.
Aisha, 19, shocked the world when she appeared on the cover of Time Magazine to lift the veil on the plight of many women in Afghanistan.
Yesterday, she bravely faced the public wearing a prosthetic nose - one that gives her some idea of how she will look after having reconstructive surgery.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1319804/Afghan-girl-Bibi-Aisha-nose-ears-hacked-Taliban-rule-gets-new-face.html#ixzz21MstInWj
Trolls will be trolls and juries will be juries.
Apparently, asking why someone made up some shit out of thin air is a personal attack? Who knew?
Man, I love this place!
At Sat Jul 21, 2012, 04:13 PM, an alert was sent on the following post:
Why do you just make shit up out of thin air?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=36641
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
personal attack. While these two members go at it all the time, generally one just takes it into ugly and the whole thread deteriorates.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Jul 21, 2012, 04:19 PM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Looks like this went off the rails at "blah, blah, blah". Insults and personal attacks don't win an argument. Agreed?
Let's have a "do over" please; spin the discourse up not down.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: This person needs to re-read the DU rules and learn what is meant by PERSONAL ATTACK
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DECISION
You will no longer be able to participate in this discussion thread, and you will not be able to start a new discussion thread in this forum until 5:19 PM. This hidden post has been added to your <a href="/?com=profile&uid=260446&sub=trans">Transparency page</a>.
Rick Warren: Aurora shooting the fault of evolution
Cross-post from GD
When students are taught they are no different from animals, they act like it.
Warren who gave the invocation at President Barack Obamas inauguration in 2009 joins company with Republican Rep. Louis Gohmert. Congressman Gohmert blamed the shooting on secularism stating:
People say... where was God in all of this? We've threatened high school graduation participations, if they use God's name, they're going to be jailed... I mean that kind of stuff. Where was God? What have we done with God? We don't want him around. I kind of like his protective hand being present.
Gohmerts reasoning actually reflects quite poorly on the character of his deity. According to him, God let those people die apparently because he didnt like the U.S. Constitution. As a point of clarification, the First Amendment prevents government led prayer forced on to the people. It does not restrict high school students from praying privately at their graduation.
In the past, religious leaders who have blamed tragedies on atheism, science, and the First Amendment have been considered to be the fundamentalist fringe like Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell. Many religious believers consider Rick Warren to be more of a moderate.
http://www.examiner.com/article/rick-warren-aurora-shooting-the-fault-of-evolution
Hey, liberal/progressive DU believers, I'm talking to you here...
How about standing up and telling these ignorant bigots that have hijacked your religion to shut the fuck up? Until you do, the religious right in this country will continue to make life hell for us all. Non-believers cannot fight this alone. The ball is in your court.
Rick Warren: Aurora shooting the fault of evolution
When students are taught they are no different from animals, they act like it.
Warren who gave the invocation at President Barack Obamas inauguration in 2009 joins company with Republican Rep. Louis Gohmert. Congressman Gohmert blamed the shooting on secularism stating:
People say... where was God in all of this? We've threatened high school graduation participations, if they use God's name, they're going to be jailed... I mean that kind of stuff. Where was God? What have we done with God? We don't want him around. I kind of like his protective hand being present.
Gohmerts reasoning actually reflects quite poorly on the character of his deity. According to him, God let those people die apparently because he didnt like the U.S. Constitution. As a point of clarification, the First Amendment prevents government led prayer forced on to the people. It does not restrict high school students from praying privately at their graduation.
In the past, religious leaders who have blamed tragedies on atheism, science, and the First Amendment have been considered to be the fundamentalist fringe like Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell. Many religious believers consider Rick Warren to be more of a moderate.
http://www.examiner.com/article/rick-warren-aurora-shooting-the-fault-of-evolution
Hey, liberal/progressive DU believers, I'm talking to you here...
How about standing up and telling these ignorant bigots that have hijacked your religion to shut the fuck up? Until you do, the religious right in this country will continue to make life hell for us all. Non-believers cannot fight this alone. The ball is in your court.
The top five most painfully self-serving reactions to the Aurora shooting
5. Iranian-American author and activist Reza Aslan. Aslan took to Twitter early and often this morning to make pointed jokes about the killings. Guy shoots, kills 16 ppl in a Colorado theater last night but dont worry folks he wasnt a Muslim so obviously this is not terrorism, he quipped just after 10:00 a.m., when most people were first waking up to the news.
4. Huffington Post blogger Cindy Handler. Every time there is a headline-grabbing mass shooting, responsible gun-owners everywhere groan inwardly and brace themselves for the deluge of hand-wringing columns and editorials calling for more stringent gun laws, as well as the equally self-righteous, defensive pushback that inevitably follows from The People Who Care Way Too Much About Guns. Thank you, Cindy Handler, for not wasting any time whatsoever in getting that process rolling.
Not that Handler doesnt have a point when she says that law enforcement personnel could be more effective in their jobs if it werent so easy for every idiot and his grandmother in this country to be packing, but this column could just as easily have run on Sunday morning, couldnt it? A day or two of reflection before the moralizing starts seems polite, at least. Plus it avoids the appearance of circling the block looking for a crime scene to hastily erect ones soapbox in.
3. Ditto New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who didnt even wait to finish his second cup of coffee Friday morning before clambering up on the moral high ground.
2. The Brady Campaign. ...this mornings petition sign-up seemed like little more than an excuse to gather email addresses.
I Demand Congress Stop Arming Dangerous People reads the petition, and who in their right mind doesnt agree with that?
Of course, an aside at the bottom of the call for petition signatures notes quietly that those who ease their consciences by signing up will automatically be added to the Brady Campaigns ongoing communications including, one assumes, calls for donations.
1. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX). Our top honors go to Texas Congressman Rep. Louie Gohmert, who opted for the Jerry Falwell on 9/11 approach, which means to hang all responsibility for a senseless and complicated tragedy on your own personal set of pet issues.
In an interview with The Heritage Founations Istook Live, the Tea Party congressman blamed ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs for the Colorado massacre, as well as for the escalating rate of suicides among active duty military personnel.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/20/the-top-five-most-painfully-self-serving-reactions-to-the-aurora-shooting/
For once, I totally agree with Pat Robertson.
The "Yes on 64" campaign behind an initiative to regulate marijuana states that, "In a March interview in The New York Times, conservative evangelist Pat Robertson said he "absolutely" supports the initiative on the ballot in Colorado that would regulate marijuana like alcohol. 'I really believe we should treat marijuana the way we treat beverage alcohol,' Robertson said. 'If people can go into a liquor store and buy a bottle of alcohol and drink it at home legally, then why do we say that the use of this other substance is somehow criminal?'"
http://www.goddiscussion.com/98960/televangelist-pat-robertson-featured-on-billboard-campaign-for-the-legalization-of-marijuana/
I think I just found common ground with a fundy!
Profile Information
Member since: Sat Jul 3, 2010, 12:24 PMNumber of posts: 19,705