HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » kag » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


Profile Information

Member since: Tue Oct 21, 2008, 10:30 PM
Number of posts: 1,836

Journal Archives

America's first lynching memorial results in some local residents filled with ire, resentment



As Sam Levin writes in The Guardian, some locals in Montgomery feel resentful that the museum is “dredging up the past.”

“It’s going to cause an uproar and open old wounds,” said Mikki Keenan, a 58-year-old longtime Montgomery resident, who was eating lunch at a southern country-style restaurant a mile from the memorial. Local residents, she said, feel “it’s a waste of money, a waste of space and it’s bringing up bullshit”.

“It keeps putting the emphasis on discrimination and cruelty,” chimed in her friend, who asked not to be named for fear that her child would disapprove of her remarks. The memorial, she added, could spark violence.


“Bring that stuff to light, and let it be there, but don’t dwell on it,” said Tommy Rhodes, a member of the Alabama Sons of Confederate Veterans. “We have moved past it … You don’t want to entice them and feed any fuel to the fire.”


Wow. So many astonishing things about these quotes...

1. She wants to remain anonymous because her child would disapprove of her remarks? Just Wow.

2. "We have moved past it..." Who is "we"? The white people whose ancestors committed the lynchings, and then presumably taught their offspring their own special brand of hatred and cruelty? So big of you to have "moved past it" . Moron.

3. Who is "them"? Who is it he's trying not to "entice". As if this memorial is intended only for "those people" whose immediate families were devastated by these horrific crimes. As if "they" are going to be so angered by this poignantly beautiful memorial that "they" might become violent? Sorry, sir. That's what YOUR ancestors did, not "theirs".

4. And as if "we" can't all learn and ponder and meditate on the causes and repercussions of such violence. Certainly this memorial goes a much longer way toward healing and growing as a nation than some idiotic statue of Stonewall Jackson.

I grew up among people like those quoted in this article. Sadly, I'm not surprised by the ignorance displayed in their comments. My hope is derived from the acknowledgement by the one woman that her children are vastly smarter than she is.

Tell you what...

I will call for an apology from Michelle Wolf to SHS, as soon as SHS calls for the president to apologize to...

Elizabeth Warren ( "Pocahontas" )
Megyn Kelly ( "Bleeding" )
Hillary Clinton ( "Crooked" among others )
Angela Merkel ( "ruining Germany" )
The 19+ women who have accused him of sexual misconduct ( "liars" )
Mexican People ( "...drugs...crime...rapists..." )
The continent of Africa ( "shithole countries" )

And those are just off the top of my head. If SHS is truly offended by insults and lies, she might want to encourage her boss to extend mea culpas to the following list:


Boulder City Council gives assault-weapons ban initial OK after marathon hearing

Source: Boulder Daily Camera

The Boulder City Council on Thursday night unanimously passed on first reading an ordinance that bans the sale and possession of certain firearms defined as assault weapons.

The council adjourned following a more than five-hour-long meeting where nearly 150 people spoke for and against the proposed ordinance, which would also prohibit high-capacity magazines and bump stocks, a device that allows a semi-automatic weapon to be fired more like a fully automatic rifle.

Council members will deliberate the measure at a future meeting and possibly pass it twice more before it becomes an enshrined Boulder ordinance.


Councilwoman Jill Adler Grano proposed, and received support for, consideration of a ban and called it a "no-brainer" — a sentiment that she stuck with on Thursday night just ahead of the vote.

Read more: http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boulder/ci_31785817/100-plus-speak-boulder-city-council-considers-ban

Jill Grano is badass!



Now that we’ve got “KAG” on the way — it’s not the best acronym, but no one ever claimed Trump was good at wordplay

I'm gonna have to change my name.

The New Randy Rainbow...KIDS!

Randy Rainbow does KIDS!

LaPierre: The elites dont care one wit about school children..."

In his CPAC address Wayne LaPierre said, "The elites don’t care one wit about school children. If they truly cared, they would protect them.”

What does he want us to do...follow our children around and jump in front of any maniac with a gun? I don't see his sorry ass lining up to take a bullet for them. In fact his CPAC speech had to be scheduled secretively and Dana Loesch had to hire private security, all to protect them from those "fake" protesters.

Question submitted by kag

The text of this question will be publicly available after it has been reviewed and answered by a DU Administrator. Please be aware that sometimes messages are not answered immediately. Thank you for your patience. --The DU Administrators

My idea to end the shutdown

Here's my idea to end the shutdown.

Congress needs to come up with a bill that does the following:
--fixes DACA with a path to legal status
--funds CHIP
--immigration fixes that D's and R's can both agree on
--provides funding for disaster relief, especially for PR and the VI
now, bear with me...
--provides lots for border security (tech, manpower, etc., but NO WALL)
--increases military spending because that's all the R's care about

It needs to be a bill that includes all of the stuff that D's and R's already agree on to a large extent, but NO WALL because a wall is stupid, wasteful, counterproductive, and everyone knows it except our moron-in-chief.

This needs to be a bill that could pass easily in both houses, perhaps something like the original bill that President Moron torpedoed. But NO WALL.

And then pass it, and when Trump vetoes it, override the veto.

Trump won't "get it" of course, but it might teach John Kelly to keep his nose out legislative business. And besides, it would be good for the country.

Franni for Senate!

I put this in a comment, and people thought it was a pretty good idea, so I thought I'd try it out as a post.

If Al's resignation is not rescinded with the full support of the Democratic Party, I say Franni (his amazing wife) should be appointed to his seat!

I read in another post that Chuck Schumer is now putting his thumb on the scale as to how he thinks the seat should be filled. Well, frankly, the ONLY people who should have their thumb on this scale are the people of Minnesota. But if Schumer can open his pie-hole on the subject, then so can I. I and I want Franni!

Maybe he should run for president.

So Franken is leaving the senate. But apparently sexual harassment/assault is okay for the president, so I hereby call on Al Franken to run for president.

I suppose he would need to switch to the Republican party first, though, since it is only ever "Okay If You're A Republican."

<--sort of
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »