HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » laserhaas » Journal

laserhaas

Profile Information

Name: Laser Haas
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: Anywhere USA
Home country: United States
Current location: NOMADIC
Member since: Mon Apr 21, 2008, 01:12 PM
Number of posts: 7,805

About Me

Love BB, Laser Tag, Poker (Tournaments only). Work with Occupy camps. Willing to help you in your fight for justice (let's discuss it).

Journal Archives

UPDATE - Racketeering Romney Litigation - (? VEGAS odds on MittTwit answering Complaint?).

Down below is a look upon the docket of the federal court styled layout concerning the October 18, 2013 Racketeering lawsuit yours truly filed against Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang of unjust enrichment profiteers. We are now in day 55 of the lawsuit progressing forward (Specifically - no corruption rearing its ugly head and shutting the case down). A couple of decent introspects into the case can be found at PoliticusUSA.com articles by Rmuse (here) (here) & (here), DailyKos (here) & (here) and the ObamaCrat (here).



To tell you the truth, I find it a miracle that we've gotten this far. So much so, it boggles my mind that the Delaware bad faith adjudication upon the merits is not storming the castle. Each and every day I go to the docket through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system ("PACER"; so doing to verify to myself - that undue influence has not taken over. My veins tighten, my heart speeds up and I get tense - each/every single time I go to the Los Angeles District Court website and look up case 2:13-cv-7738.

And yet, by miracle of miracles - here we are in day 55 of the "Haas v Romney" case; which IS going forward.

Here's the thing. I've got MittTwit and his gang of nefarious men/attorneys by the proverbial's. The evidence is profuse, overwhelming and irrefutable. Most of the proofs of the Racketeering is found in the court docket record. The reason the evidence trail is something a 1st failing law student could successfully prosecute them all - is because of hubris. Romney, Traub and MNAT simply did NOT give a damn how much lying, thieving and corruption they did openly. They stalwarts arduously believed that their "boss" was going to be THE BOSS of America (POTUS).

But - Mitt Didn't Make It!

Delaware Valley federal courts and agencies (U.S. Trustee & U.S. Attorney) - have rogue elements within who are also guilty of being duplicitous in the racketeering. Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to name the agencies as defendants; but I have named the former United States Attorney Colm F Connolly.



Next week I'm going to file a motion (and pay careful attention to this now) that is asking the court to stipulate (under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 201 "Judicial Notice" - and make a ruling on the fact that Mitt Romney & his co-Defendants are NOT above the Law. Obviously, that is an extraordinary request. After all, judges swear an oath to administrate the law equally to rich & poor alike. But I'm asking a legitimate question. Are parties like Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney above the Law?

Prior to this good faith justice (His Honor Stephen V. Wilson) taking on the "Haas v Romney" Racketeering case and permitting it to go through proper procedure; everyone else (heretofore) has treated Mitt & his gang as "IF" they ARE above the law.

And that ain't right.

So, now that the case is proceeding along (thus far) in proper form - the next step is that the parties are to be served a Summons and have to answer within 21 days.
10/18/2013 2 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint - 1 as to defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser. (esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)


However - I've made a request that the judge (due to mayhem & homicides) order the U.S. Marshals to serve the Summonses.

But, I'm going to amend that request, now that I've studied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedures (specifically Rule 4); which states that you can request a party "waive" service. When such is done (by mail) in a federal lawsuit, the defendants canNOT be unreasonable. When that process goes its course, Romney & his gang will have 30 days (instead of 21) - to respond.

Which brings U.S. to the point - what would be the Las Vegas ODDs on such occurring?



There are many an attorney trying to help the bandits who bragged & sneered that the case would be tossed out by the Clerk of Court. When that didn't happen, the trolls and such said that the judge would FINE me (specifically under Fed.R.Civ.P 11) - for daring to bring the case into court. But none of those brown-nosers are looking at that little thing called evidence. We already have confessions to 34 acts of lying under oath to a chief federal justice. To win this case, I only need 2 acts (technically). Though, I'll grant this - that the court is going to require more than a mere two.

And I've got plenty proofs more!

So, being that Capone's ghost incarnate (Romney) has been caught with his pants down; how is that "magic" underwear of his going to get him out of this jam? He doesn't have his billion dollar advertising budget (though - technically - he still owns Clear Channel/Rush Lame-baugh)! So how will the case go? If Romney answers the Summons/ Complaint - the main stream media will have NO choice. They will have to pick up the story.

Again - what are the VEGAS odds that Mitt will answer the complaint?


Will Romney and his gang all get together and ask the court to have me shot? They simply can NOT answer the complaint. If they were honest (I think it is actually against the Law for Pitten's to not engage in flip flopping banter) - then the answer would be something like this;

"May it please the court - we were just fooling. Yes, we did "toy" around with eToys, beat up on Laser Haas and steal about a billion dollars or so from The Learning Company, Kay Bee, Stage Stores and the public company/bankruptcy estate of eToys; but Romney RAN for President of the United States! Surely the court agrees that such has to count for somethin. Doesn't a POTUS wannabe receive automatic "get out of jail free cards"? Besides, who gives a damn about Laser Haas - anyway? If the court would like, we can insert our very own judge (Kent A Jordan) - like we inserted our very own attorney (Colm Connolly) to be head federal prosecutor".

"Surely the court understands that Romney was retroactively retired from Bain Capital as CEO"?

Besides, Corporations are people - and they deserve a "get out of jail free card" - too!

---
Will maniacal Mitt answer - Or will the powers that be - come into play?




[br][hr][hr][br]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:13-cv-07738-SVW-AGR


Steven Laser Haas v. Willard Mitt Romney et al
Assigned to: Judge Stephen V. Wilson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

[br]
Date Filed: 10/18/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
[hr]
Plaintiff
Steven Laser Haas
-----------------
Delmar, DE 19940
PRO SE

V.
Defendant
Willard Mitt Romney

Defendant
Paul Traub

Defendant
Bain Capital

Defendant
John and Jane Does
1 thru 10

Defendant
Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel ("MNAT"

Defendant
Greg Werkheiser

Defendant
Barry Gold

Defendant
Michael Glazer

Defendant
Colm F Connolly

Defendant
Goldman Sachs

Defendant
Johann Hamerski

Date Filed # Docket Text
10/18/2013 1 COMPLAINT against defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, John and Jane Does 1 thru 10, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg; (Filing fee $ 400 PAID); Jury Demanded; filed by plaintiff Steven Laser Haas. (Attachments: # 1 part 2)(esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)

10/18/2013 2 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint - 1 as to defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser. (esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)

10/18/2013 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff Steven Laser Haas, identifying Other Affiliate eToys, Other Affiliate Shareholders of eToys, Other Affiliate Wells Fargo-FootHill Capital, Other Affiliate Collateral Logistics, Inc, Other Affiliate Playco-Toys International, Other Affiliate Kay Bee Toys for Steven Laser Haas. (esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)


10/24/2013 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg is participating in a pilot project regarding the submission of SEALED DOCUMENTS. Effective July 8, 2013, all proposed sealed documents pertaining to discovery matters referred to the magistrate judge must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address at [email protected] Please refer to the judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/24/2013)

10/25/2013 5 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) (Entered: 10/25/2013)


11/06/2013 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, John and Jane Does, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser, Johann Hamerski amending Complaint - (Discovery), 1 , filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3)(pj) (Entered: 11/07/2013)

12/02/2013 7 REQUEST for Leave to to have United States Marshals to serve summons upon the defendants filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas. (pj) (Entered: 12/10/2013)


12/02/2013 8 RACKETEERING CIVIL PRELIMINARY RICO CASE STATEMENT 1st Edition Part A filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas (pj) (Entered: 12/10/2013)
[br]

Kicking & Rec'ing - THANKS for this. Just wish she were a Senator somewhere else than Bain'ville



She was a bankruptcy case attorney and KNOWs I've got Pitten's by the proverbials;
but - I can't ask her to go full bore - against her constituents.

Just seems skewed!

Romney the Racketeer - Fed Ct - UpDate December 10, 2013 - Preliminary RICO Case Statement

Yours truly, as an executive of eToys.com and a fiduciary who blew the whistle on Romney the Racketeer, found it necessary to "Sue Romney for RICO in Fed Court" on October 18, 2013.

An "1st Amended Complaint" was filed thereafter (See Complaint part 1 - part 2 and part 3).

Resultantly - the Fed Ct assigned the Honorable Justice Stephen V. Wilson;
who issued the "New Case Order".

Purportedly, many federal courts require, of those who file Civil Racketeering Complaints as "Private Attorney Generals" - to do as prosecutors must - by disclosing the entire case against the Defendants, up front. Upon receiving an Order from the court stipulating a pre-determined outline of issues/facts; a plaintiff then is required (usually within 20/30 days) to supply a "RICO Case Statement".

While yours truly is anticipating such will come soon enough, in anticipation of such;
a submission of a "Preliminary RICO Case Statement" was Clocked into the docket record today.

Stay Tuned...


much - much more, to come![br]



Main Stream reporter points out my mistake on Marty Lackner suicide story.

Marty Lackner "reportedly" committed suicide during the Petters Ponzi case. What is at issue is that Paul Traub was Petters partner and Paul Traub is also Mitt Romney's partner.

Even - "if" - Marty Lackner actually did kill himself (which this pursuer of justice feels is suspect); the fact of the matter remains that J. Lackner was Marty Lackner's brother. And J. Lackner is the Assistant United States Attorney (head at the time of the Criminal Prosecution Division) - of the Minnesota Department of Justice United States Attorney's office.

Am I the ONLY one who understands the significance of all those facts?


In the many quests to find fault with yours truly - concerning my Romney Racketeering federal lawsuit (see "Haas v Romney" issues - HERE) I've run into many naysayers and main stream media fault finders. Having talked to everyone from NBC Universal, independents, Ed Schultz's Producer, HuffPo and Associated Press and more; I'm still amazed at the profuse amount of cognitive dissonance and haughty bias. Now one gal said to me yesterday -

"Laser, you're mistaken about your contention on the Marty Lackner story"!

Of course my back tensed up, my hair stiffened and I got irked at her real quick. Responding to her remark with a quick cutoff of any further banter from her, I simply said "Hush up ma'an, your touting Bull [c]hit"!

[br][hr][br]

BACKGROUND - Who is Marty Lackner and why he (purportedly) committed suicide!

It is highly unusual that any one individual would be engaged in a civil war type battle with Mitt Romney; as he tends to slaughter companies - not just one person. And it is also highly unusual that anyone would turn down a bribe and chance to be Pitten's partner. Be that as it may, Romney and I are adversaries and yours truly filed a Federal RICO case against him on October 18th; in order to resolve our dispute.

Laser Haas alleges Romney is a Racketeer; and almost everyone out there thinks I'm nuts.

Naysayers are about to eat their words!


Marty Lackner passed away in 2009; after he and his friends contacted me concerning the Minnesota federal cases on Tom Petters Ponzi (see Star Tribune stories (here).



I'm the blogging expert on Petters Ponzi; because Paul Traub is Petters partner and yours truly has hounded the feds for a decade to arrest them both. (See my "Petters-Fraud" website (here), (here) and (here).

The reason why Marty and/or other parties contacted yours truly about the Tom Petters, is the fact that word spread around anonymous people and "tippers" could contact me and trust I would not reveal them as a source.

What Marty Lackner and his friends told me, is that he was involved in the Petters Ponzi affairs. Marty claimed he had broken no laws and that he was the brother of J. Lackner.

That would be Minnesota, Assistant United States Attorney Jim Lackner;
who was also head of the Dept of Justice's Criminal Prosecution Division
.

To put it succinctly, I said "Bull [c]hit" and hung up the phone.

Because so much evidence was flowing through my hands and being forwarded on to the United States Attorneys office in Minnesota and I was also alleging that federal corruption was occurring; I believed the first phone call was a set up - to get me for Obstruction.

Then friends of Marty Lackner called me and informed of his purported suicide.

From that day forward, no matter how much I may doubt the validity of someone's contentions, I now take the time to instruct them to email me a summary; and then I perform a preliminary investigation into the issues - before I consider denouncing their remarks.

Marty Lackner died - of a "reported" suicide - in 2009.


As of a few days ago, the only story that was known to me, about Marty Lackner, is the Minnesota Public Radio online article titled "More than lost fortunes in the wake of Petters' Ponzi scheme"

If you'll take the time to look at the article, you will see two things. Marty Lackner WAS involved in the Petters Ponzi scheme (via Greg Bell's Lancelot/Sky Bell "feeder" funds); and that yours truly is the only commenter.
[br]
People say Laser Haas is a CT Nut on the issue that Marty Lackner & J Lackner are brothers.


- - It is a miracle that MPR censors permitted my comments to remain. Everyone, including people who know me well - stated that I'm full of bull. But my allegations upon the MPR Fortunes Lost story do remain; and I've been attacked by thousands of people (including close friends) who say they don't believe me.

What is at issue is the fact that it is super HUGE news of ANYONE being directly connected to Tom Petters Ponzi and the Minnesota Dept. of Justice; and (surely) the No. 1 main stream newspaper in Minnesota (the Star Tribune) would have carried such an important story. Hence, if ST is not telling the tale, then Laser Haas is simply taking 2 people with the same last name and making stuff up.

EAAANNNTTT - How terribly Wrong those bubble farquarts truly are!

After all, there are so many nationally significant and important issues that beg. Surely no entity such as the Star Tribune would be remiss in its chance to answer the riddle of how Bernie Madoff and/or Tom Petters could do Billions in frauds and get away with it for more than a decade. Especially since the Star Tribune was fighting for its very life and would have rushed to get national attention to such a HUGE story (the ST filed for bankruptcy during the Petters Ponzi case). Again, there are SO MANY questions that beg.

Like the questions that

  1. Did Marty Lackner know Petters was a Ponzi schemer?
  2. "IF" Marty and J. Lackner are brothers - what did J. Lackner KNOW?
  3. Did J. Lackner ever receive ANY gifts from his brother Marty?
  4. Such as a vacation, a boat, car - or House!
  5. Had Marty and Jim EVER engaged in ANY discussion about Tom Petters?
  6. Are there emails between the two?
  7. If so, WHERE are those emails now?
  8. Who at the Dept of Justice did the review of Marty/Jim Lackner issue?
  9. Why hasn't the Minnesota and/or D.C. DOJ come forward about the connection?
  10. WERE the emails between Marty and Jim - DESTROYED?
  11. Where is J. Lackner NOW?
  12. Was he put on suspension during the Petters Ponzi case?
  13. WHO ELSE at the DOJ (either/or MN and/or Washington D.C.) KNEW about the connection?
  14. WHY hasn't Petters utilized that issue and Larry Reynolds being in WISTEC to get a New Trial?
  15. If the MN DOJ did NOT know of the connection, surely Marty was under investigation!
  16. Are there files on Marty Lackner?
  17. Where are those files NOW!
  18. Who at the DOJ (MN or otherwise) took control of the Marty Lackner/Jim Lackner review?
  19. IF Marty Lackner did commit suicide - WHY?
  20. MOST importantly - DID MARTY LACKNER actually kill himself?

Marty Lackner was in his 40's, had a wife and 3 children;
and he (purportedly) left NO NOTE!

[br]
[hr][br]
Is the reporter right?
-------------------- Did Laser Haas get the Marty Lackner thing wrong?


Actually - the reporter is right! - AND - Yours truly didn't get it wrong!


Aha! - - Confused now! - - Aren't you?

You are going to spank me now, for being such a smart ass, in my efforts to stick it up the butt and rotate the naysayers/ Congnitive Dissonance Gangs. Because I could have titled this thing a whole other way, to point out the fact that yours truly didn't get it wrong; and yes - the main stream (VERY main stream) reporter is also correct.

What the media gal (who -btw - is BEGGING for her editor to do the "Haas v Romney" full story) said to yours truly is that "Laser, you're mistaken about your contention on the Marty Lackner story". She is absolutely 100% correct. I did get something wrong.

Of the many remarks that I've made about the case, foolishly trying to defend my remarks against stalwarts, naysayers, petty people and others hell bent to find fault with me (and/or stick their brown nose right up Romney's arse) - are 2 primary statements.

1 - Marty Lackner is the brother of Minnesota Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Lackner

and

2 - That "No main stream media outlet has dared to tell the story"


Do you see now - where we are going?

How Laser Haas knows that Marty Lackner is the brother of Minnesota Assistant United States Attorney J. Lackner; is the very FACT that yours truly got the tip straight from the horse's mouth.

Marty Lackner told me that Jim Lackner was his brother.

All the detractors state that yours truly is simply making stuff up. That what I'm guilty of, is taking two people with the same last name; and adding A+B to equal my desired QEZ.

EAAANTTT!

As I've told you, I'm able to prove (by emails and more) how truly full of horse pie the naysayers are.

We now have corroboration, that will (forevermore) shut up the contention that yours truly is simply making stuff up, in order to reach a desired conclusion. As it is now an undeniable FACT that Marty Lackner was involved in Petters Ponzi via Lancelot.

Unfortunately, it is also a FACT that Marty Lackner (purportedly) committed suicide in 2009!
(See Legacy.com Obituary - here and MPR story - here).

- - That being said, it is now also a FACT that Marty Lackner is the brother of Minnesota (former head of Criminal Prosecution Division) - Assistant United States Attorney J. Lackner. As is iterated by Main Justice website (here) that;

James Lackner (Appellate Chief)

Prior to this appointment, Lackner served as Senior Litigation Counsel from December 1994 to August 2005; Criminal Division Chief from August 2005 to April 2007; and First Assistant U.S. Attorney from March 2006 to December 2006. Lackner, who joined the Office in December 1983, graduated from Macalester College in 1975 and Northwestern University Law School in 1978. He joined the Office after working in the Minnesota Attorney Generalís Office.

[br]
PROOF Marty Lackner and MN AUSA J. Lackner are brothers!

[br]
Now, for the final nail in the naysay coffin (that also provides verification that the main stream reporter was correct - yours truly got the Marty Lackner story wrong - one the "issue" that "NO main stream media outlet has reported the Lackner links". Here's an article by Pioneer Press website (TwinCities.com) titled "What did the money men know"?

Which states specifically;

Martin Lackner is also the brother of Jim Lackner, an assistant U.S. attorney in the Minneapolis office. Jim Lackner declined comment. A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office said Jim Lackner never worked on the Petters or Bell cases. When the U.S. attorney's office learned about Martin Lackner and his relationship to Jim, it notified defense attorneys for both Petters and Bell, he said.

[br]

Now, we can all get ready for the naysay kumquats remarking - - "So What"!

[br][hr][br]


[br]
As for me, the "List" above and those questions ARE going to be answered;
unless the same type of corruption that hid this issue - prevents my "Haas v Romney"


from going to trial!

[br]
N'est-ce pas!







And that great philosophy as a basic - is why POTUS Obama slammed dunked round 2

against you know who!

Warren in 2016 - Fantastic! - This story subject matter - WHACKED

Shooting your own kin under a paranoid dellusion falls under moronically absurd.

Not SYG.

Kiss'ing Racketeering Romney: An Effort by a Pro Se to Keep it Simple/not Stupid

What we have here - is a failure to communicate!

This whistleblower turned down a bribe from Mitt Romney's gang and reported them to the Department of Justice in 2001 (during the eToys bankruptcy case). Instead of arresting the fraudsters - the Dept. of [IN]Justice rallied its support of Organized Crime (probably in the hopes of doing a POTUS wannabe a favor and get rewarded when Romney handpicked that "friendly" U.S. Attorney General that Sheldon Adelson was putting up $100 million to buy).
[br]
Because Laser Haas failed English and didn't (technically) graduate from High School;
the Organized Crooks (Racketeers) - want you to let them OFF totally 'Scott Free'!


And that Ain't Right!


FACTS NOT in DISPUTE

- - - Yours truly is a victim of organized crime. And, mind you, not just any ordinary efforts in syndicated felony law breaking; but that of/by non other than Willard Mitt Romney ("Romney" and his Racketeering GANG. Most have forgotten the fact that Mitt is an attorney at law from Harvard.

Whereas, yours we (eToys shareholders & I) alleged -Romney has a Gang (see list of co-conspirators below) -

Romney became powerful and rich as a corporate raider;
- - - - - - - - - - and did so Illegally!


Because there's much money to be made defending the likes of Mitt; there are many an attorney, troll, stalwart, brown-nosier and other types of detractors/naysayers - who are all too willing to come out and say

"Hey - Pitten's is just a corporate raider who is ruthless and rich.
- - - - - There's nothing against the law of being a corporate raider ruthless
".

Bull {c}hit is still manure - no matter how you spell and/or slice the cow pie!


Everyone is already aware that Romney lied about his tenure as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO" of Bain Capital. What most are not aware of - are the real reasons WHY the POTUS wannabe claims to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001; back to February 11, 1999.

What is it that Romney is so scared of; that he LIED {committed PERJURY}
- - - -to the ENTIRE Country about when he was CEO of Bain Capital

- - - - - upon his federal election campaign finance form (Office of Government Ethics {"OGE"} 278 Form)?

[br]

Racketeering Co-Conspirators of Romney's

Yours Truly has the answers to why Mitt lied upon his OGE Campaign Finance 278 Form.

The (REAL) reasons are are;

  1. Paul Traub
  2. Traub's "TBF" law firm
  3. Barry Gold (Traub's partner)
  4. Michael Glazer (whom Gold & Traub worked with)
  5. Greg Werkheiser (a partner of MNAT)
  6. Colm Connolly (MNAT partner who became U.S. Attorney)
  7. Goldman Sachs (a client of MNAT)
  8. Morris Nichols ("MNAT"
  9. Bain Capital (also a Client of MNAT)
  10. The Learning Company (Merged by MNAT with Mattel)
  11. Stage Stores (owned by Romney, who hired Michael Glazer, whom Barry Gold worked for with Traub)
  12. Kay Bee (CEO was Michael Glazer)
  13. eToys (MNAT as eToys counsel, Traub's TBF eToys creditors counsel,)
  14. Barry Gold (Traub's confessed partner) became illegal CEO of eToys
  15. MNAT, Traub and Barry Gold all lied about their links to Romney/Glazer/Bain/Kay bee
  16. Glazer/Kay Bee - bought eToys (for Romney when he was CEO of Bain)
  17. Barry Gold, MNAT and Traub did - ILLEGALLY - reduce the prices to Romney/Bain/Glazer/Kay Bee

[br]
It is a FACT that all of those parties are connected to each other; as per Court Docket Record Affidavits and Confessions. It is NOT in dispute that Barry Gold and Paul Traub are partners in Asset Disposition Advisors ("ADA". It is CONFESSED (see U.S. Trustee Disgorge Motion of Traub's TBF for $1.6 million dollars {here} AND - Wall Street Journal July 25, 2005 article "eToys investors claims conflicts at law firm".

In parts 19 & 35 of the Disgorge Motion - Federal Police (U.S. Trustee) - notes parties were "forewarned".


Then, the Disgorge Motion concludes that "Fraud on the Court" occurred!


The United States Supreme Court did RE-open a previously closed case for YEARS - of In re Hazel Atlas Glass v Hartford Empire and concluded that there are NO Statute of Limitations for Fraud on the Court by Officers of the Court.

Hartford was (eventually) punished for the fraud it did nine (9) years earlier; and the U.S. Supreme set the standard in Hazel Atlas that the Disgorge Motion reiterates appropriately the fact (in part 29) - correctly that -

{T}ampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud.


[br][hr][br]

FELONY Crimes by Romney & his RICO Gang


Rico Case Law:

The defendants constitute an illegal enterprise in acts or threat of acts in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO" Act of 1970. The LAW is United States Code Title 18 with Sections, 1961-1968.

One only needs two (2) separate (specific 18 U.S.C. 1961 "predicate acts" crimes during a long period of time; in order to successfully prosecute a Civil RICO case under Section 1961(c).


The following are particular violations; of an RICO Section 1961 "predicate acts";
which - by the way - also includes Bankruptcy Frauds!

18 USC 241: Conspiracy against Rights of Citizens:

18 USC 3: Accessory after the fact, knowing that an offense has been
committed against the United States, relieves, receives, comforts or assists
the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment.

18 USC 242: Deprivation of Rights color of law of rights protected under the
Constitution of the U.S.

18 USC 512: Tampering with a witness

18 USC 1341: Mail fraud

18 USC 1343: Wire fraud

18 USC 1503: Obstruction of justice

18 USC 1510: Obstructing of criminal investigation

18 USC 1513: Retaliating against a witness, victim or informant

18 USC 1951: Interference with interstate commerce

18 USC 1621: Perjury

18 USC 1001: Fraud
[br][hr][br]

Federal (Civil) RICO cases are also permitted to review issues of individual "STATE" Felony violations;
as long as they carry more than one (1) year in prison - upon conviction.
[br][hr][br]

SUMMING it UP!

Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang already - ARE - guilty;
because they've confessed to 35 crimes in the eToys federal case.

However,

they were not held accountable for their culpability;
because of the federal corruption of Colm F Connolly!


This plaintiff's case against Romney, is still going forward (thus far);
and - over the next few weeks - I've got a plan to shove the facts up any stalwarts butt.

They are counting on the fact that you'll fall asleep when I quote the Law. It is rather easy for them to point out the fact that "hey, the guy didn't even graduate high school - he simply does NOT understand the Law".

Bull {c}hit is still manure;
no matter who says otherwise.

Could AL Capone "retroactively" escape his acts of organized crimes?

- - - - - - - Of course NOT!

Neither should Mitt - the PITTs - Romney.

Over the next several weeks, I'm going to file - in federal court - the proofs of Romney's RICO/Gang issues of Organized Crimes. By only posting one item at a time. Then the trolls, attorneys at law, stalwarts, naysayers and all who believe it is okay to betray a client - - will only have one thing to attack.

- - - - - - - - -As it now appears tha- the Truth will stop Romney's Gang from being "Scot Free"!
[br][hr][br]





If this be true; I believe the names of the souls should be immortalized as Freedom Fighters

extraordinaire!

Having paid the ultimate price;
for doing nothing naughty or nice!

Bumped up cause I really like KO's style (yes - pun intended)

All the greats who won't be bought (KO, Gumble, Wallace, Rather)

get tossed to the less effective realms.

KUDOs much to K.O. for doing his best to give his reports real zest!

Eaaaannnntttt! Wrong again typo pen! Bad guys/gals are ones who join the mob of bullies

to beat up on a victim; with the veiled agenda of helping career crooks get away with organized crimes!

N'est-ce pas!
Go to Page: « Prev 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 ... 117 Next »