CEO of Goldman Sachs Lambasted Sanders as Grave Threat, but Not Clinton. Why?

[TalkingDog]

Oh, come on now. You know why.

http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/ceo-of-infamous-goldman-sachs-lambasted-sanders-as-grave-threat-but-not-clinton-why

To sum:

Lloyd Blankfein and his fellow masters of the universe know that they don't need to ask for a specific quid pro quo from Hillary Clinton; she is a member of their elite neoliberal economic club.

[djean111]

1. Because Hillary will be a help, and not a hindrance.

I am sure they have the champagne cooling on ice, just waiting for a victory.

[TDale313]

2. I assume that's a rhetorical question.

But I'll answer it anyway. Because Hillary is not gonna do a damn thing that would negatively impact them. Quite the opposite.

[Mudcat]

3. "Knock it off" vs "Break em up" -

As my grandma used to say, they know which side their bread is buttered on

[tazkcmo]

4. No surprise here.

Not supporting HRC is RIDICULOUS!!! Why?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511361478#post4

"Because "She is a GREAT candidate who is brilliant, experienced, very well qualified, and TOUGH."

So brilliant she "wipes" a server with a cloth or so brilliant she plays stupid so well.
So experienced at renaming post offices and regime change creating radical militias.
So very well qualified she's under investigation by the FBI.
So tough she survives kissing Wall St butt because $21 million buys a lot sanitizer.



No thank you.

[Jefferson23]

5. wink wink...that's why. n/t