Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnlinePoker

(5,737 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:15 AM Apr 2016

Clinton campaign chief linked to Russian bank listed in Panama Papers

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Washington Examiner

The head of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign is linked to a Russian bank involved with an emerging international scandal, according to documents reported on Tuesday.

Registration forms indicate that the Podesta Group signed up to lobby for the Sberbank of Russia in Washington about a month ago, in early March. The bank has been implicated in a scheme unearthed on Sunday in which leaders worldwide illegally stashed their assets overseas.

Read more: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-campaign-chief-linked-to-russian-bank-listed-in-panama-papers/article/2587741?custom_click=rss



The stink from the Panama Papers keeps spreading.
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton campaign chief linked to Russian bank listed in Panama Papers (Original Post) OnlinePoker Apr 2016 OP
Right-Wing online 'newspaper' loaded with right-wing bloggers says something. onehandle Apr 2016 #1
Which part of the report are you disputing? Scuba Apr 2016 #2
The source does give me pause, but it cites docs that can be checked. Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #3
The gun, yea me too... pangaia Apr 2016 #30
Yeah that gun RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #38
... FailureToCommunicate Apr 2016 #4
Podesta Group / Iraq tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #5
For the work he did with BP he would burn in Hell, if there was one! Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #11
Tony Podesta is not John. eom BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #15
(Tony) Podesta co-founded the Podesta Group with his brother John Podesta tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #17
In 1988. John has not been actively BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #20
not talking about Panama at all tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #22
The "lobbying aspects of government BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #29
"linked" -- by a RW screed. It's major Russian bank represented by lobbyists. Unless you think pnwmom Apr 2016 #6
Results B Calm Apr 2016 #7
And? Lucinda Apr 2016 #8
Excellent. RATM435 Apr 2016 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #10
Okay...here's the actual Podesta Lobbying Registration Form OnlinePoker Apr 2016 #12
From March 2016. BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #16
Everybody is, it's the new normal, big deal! closeupready Apr 2016 #13
Another of the usual no nuance slurs. BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #14
It is the company you keep OnlinePoker Apr 2016 #19
"close ties to the Democratic Party" BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #21
You should get an A for effort FailureToCommunicate Apr 2016 #41
"Book 'Em Danno" Ford_Prefect Apr 2016 #18
BENGHAZI!!!!11111 jpak Apr 2016 #23
And so it begins..... pinebox Apr 2016 #24
More accurately:"So it continues"-shady deals & scandals never ending. Divernan Apr 2016 #26
True pinebox Apr 2016 #27
Tenuous. Turborama Apr 2016 #25
It proves that John Podesta's brother is a lobbyist. Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #31
Surprise, surprise!!! Not much. Podesta..... 7wo7rees Apr 2016 #28
CIA? jwirr Apr 2016 #34
Bernie better keep going.... Arizona Roadrunner Apr 2016 #32
I don't see how this changes much... Jerrymooney Apr 2016 #33
Right-Wing sources seem to be OK at DU these days oberliner Apr 2016 #35
What? No way, can't be humbled_opinion Apr 2016 #36
What a reach BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #37
"Linked"? Very clever. That is a REAL stretch. George II Apr 2016 #39
Locking after a review by forum hosts Omaha Steve Apr 2016 #40

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. Right-Wing online 'newspaper' loaded with right-wing bloggers says something.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:27 AM
Apr 2016

What? Was the world net daily link not up to The 'Not Hillary' Party's 'standards?'

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
2. Which part of the report are you disputing?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:31 AM
Apr 2016

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
3. The source does give me pause, but it cites docs that can be checked.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:35 AM
Apr 2016

You might do your candidate some good--or do yourself good if scandal hits your candidate--by studying up on the Panama scandal, the Clinton Foundation and the FBI's email server investigation. I think your candidate is vulnerable on these issues.

What is the gun for? It always startles me to see it.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
30. The gun, yea me too...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016
 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
38. Yeah that gun
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:01 AM
Apr 2016

That person better not come around when Clinton starts complaining about Sanders' "record on gun control."

FailureToCommunicate

(14,080 posts)
4. ...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:36 AM
Apr 2016

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
5. Podesta Group / Iraq
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:53 AM
Apr 2016
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/13/tony-podesta-group-iraq-lobbying

excerpt:

Whenever you think DC sleaze has reached its low point, it always manages to prove you wrong. Politico's Byron Taub and Anna Palmer this afternoon report that the authoritarian, human-rights-abusing government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malki is about to hire The Podesta Group as its first lobbying firm.

That firm is run by Tony Podesta, who legally peddles his influence with Democratic Party politicians to shape legislation on behalf of companies such as BP Oil, General Dynamics, Walmart, and Bank of America.

Dustlawyer

(10,502 posts)
11. For the work he did with BP he would burn in Hell, if there was one!
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:20 AM
Apr 2016

BlueMTexpat

(15,387 posts)
15. Tony Podesta is not John. eom
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:41 AM
Apr 2016

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
17. (Tony) Podesta co-founded the Podesta Group with his brother John Podesta
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:48 AM
Apr 2016

BlueMTexpat

(15,387 posts)
20. In 1988. John has not been actively
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:00 AM
Apr 2016

associated with the Group for many years.

The association with Sberbank - a legitimate lobbying relationship, btw - only began in March 2016.

Do you mean to imply that John was involved in setting up all these Panamanian secret accounts? Because that's what it seems to me - and that is pretty flimsy.

Why not also consider me involved in those same nefarious doings? I myself had a very tangential relationship with Sberbank from 2006-2008 - to enable Russian victims of the Nazi Reich to receive payments for harms done to them. So, of course, I must have known everything about the secret accounts in Panama too.

Same (il)logic. This place gets crazier and crazier.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
22. not talking about Panama at all
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:04 AM
Apr 2016

I think the Guardian is a more respectable source and the lobbying aspects of government on a grand scale is a little more prescient to me right now

BlueMTexpat

(15,387 posts)
29. The "lobbying aspects of government
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:22 AM
Apr 2016

on a grand scale" - not sure what you mean by this ???

If you mean that lobbying on a grand scale harms government, I agree with you when the lobbying is done on behalf of corporate interests alone. But there is a lot of lobbying that takes place to advance social causes in a way that individual voters cannot. More precision on your part is necessary, IMO.

But the context of the OP here is to smear Hillary because her campaign manager has a very tangential - and very recent link - to Sberbank, which was very involved in setting up nefarious accounts in Panama, presumably for Russian citizens.

That is simply wrong. You might as well smear me for my "relationship" with Sberbank, which although tangential was likely more substantive than ANY Podesta - and by extension, Hillary - relationship would be.

pnwmom

(109,054 posts)
6. "linked" -- by a RW screed. It's major Russian bank represented by lobbyists. Unless you think
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:54 AM
Apr 2016

we should have no business or political relations with Russia, there will be these 'links."

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
7. Results
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:01 AM
Apr 2016

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:45 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Clinton campaign chief linked to Russian bank listed in Panama Papers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141404446

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Using a right wing source to smear Democrats. Clearly the campaign nor Podesta has any connection to hiding the money since they just took them on as a client a month ago. This alliance with the right wing to promote the GOP electoral prospects does not belong on a Democratic site.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:57 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Defend your candidate with facts instead!
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: DU has become a new Freeper site.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
8. And?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:05 AM
Apr 2016
 

RATM435

(392 posts)
9. Excellent.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:12 AM
Apr 2016

Response to OnlinePoker (Original post)

OnlinePoker

(5,737 posts)
12. Okay...here's the actual Podesta Lobbying Registration Form
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:36 AM
Apr 2016

BlueMTexpat

(15,387 posts)
16. From March 2016.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:42 AM
Apr 2016

So?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
13. Everybody is, it's the new normal, big deal!
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:37 AM
Apr 2016



BlueMTexpat

(15,387 posts)
14. Another of the usual no nuance slurs.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:40 AM
Apr 2016

Although the Podesta Group was co-founded in 1988 by brothers John and Tony Podesta, it is Tony who runs the group today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Podesta

It is John who is chairman of the Clinton Campaign. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podesta

Even the information from this dubious source shows that the Group - whose work is to lobby for Sberbank, not to enhance its practices in Panama - did not enter that relationship until a month ago. The Panamanian schemes were in place LONG before that.

But yes, let's please slur Hillary. Anyway we can.

As a matter of fact, part of my last job before "official" retirement involved making arrangements with this same Sberbank to pay claimants in Russia sums due them from their experiences under the Nazi Reich. Sberbank was the only feasible payment mechanism in Russia.

Does this also link ME with Sberbank's nefarious practices in Panama?

OnlinePoker

(5,737 posts)
19. It is the company you keep
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:54 AM
Apr 2016

From your Wiki link to John Podesta: Now known as the Podesta Group, the firm "has close ties to the Democratic Party and the Obama administration [and] has been retained by some of the biggest corporations in the country, including Wal-Mart, BP and Lockheed Martin."

BlueMTexpat

(15,387 posts)
21. "close ties to the Democratic Party"
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:01 AM
Apr 2016

Isn't Bernie running as a Democrat?

FailureToCommunicate

(14,080 posts)
41. You should get an A for effort
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:18 AM
Apr 2016

from the Hillary campaign. But here it looks like you're running on fumes. Might be time for a stop to fill up the tank?

Ford_Prefect

(7,994 posts)
18. "Book 'Em Danno"
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:52 AM
Apr 2016

jpak

(41,765 posts)
23. BENGHAZI!!!!11111
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:04 AM
Apr 2016
 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
24. And so it begins.....
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:07 AM
Apr 2016

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
26. More accurately:"So it continues"-shady deals & scandals never ending.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:12 AM
Apr 2016
 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
27. True
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:13 AM
Apr 2016

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
25. Tenuous.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:11 AM
Apr 2016

What does this actually prove?

Kingofalldems

(38,600 posts)
31. It proves that John Podesta's brother is a lobbyist.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:47 AM
Apr 2016

But I bet Hillary put him up to it!!

Benghazi!

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
28. Surprise, surprise!!! Not much. Podesta.....
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:16 AM
Apr 2016

Now why does that name sound so familiar? .......

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
34. CIA?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:48 AM
Apr 2016
 

Arizona Roadrunner

(168 posts)
32. Bernie better keep going....
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:48 AM
Apr 2016

Great, now another potential problem for a very flawed Clinton candidacy. Better make sure Bernie hangs around. By the way, is John Podesta making any money from "the firm" he and his brother started? If he is, then his position as Clinton's campaign manager may have numerous conflicts of interest. The top people around Clinton have not been properly vetted and therefore, her whole campaign is suspect.

By the way, I am waiting for a taxpayer to sue Clinton for release of those speeches to Goldman-Sachs. If Goldman-Sachs tax deducted those speeches as an "expense", then it would be interesting to find out if a regular taxpayer has "standing" to sue. This would be based on the "regular" taxpayer paying more in taxes or getting less in services because of the lost revenue to the government due to the $675,000 tax deduction.

 

Jerrymooney

(36 posts)
33. I don't see how this changes much...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:48 AM
Apr 2016

There is a part of me, the Bernie supporter, that wants this story to have legs. So far, though, I'm not really even seeing the guilt by association. I think Sanders' message that Clinton takes money from big money is well established and this might support the narrative, but I'm not sure how much it adds.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
35. Right-Wing sources seem to be OK at DU these days
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:52 AM
Apr 2016

As long as they say something negative about Hilary.

humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
36. What? No way, can't be
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:54 AM
Apr 2016

to be honest, I won't be surprised if she got money from a bunch of dirty foreign investment banks, RELEASE THE TRANSCRIPTS....

BeyondGeography

(39,430 posts)
37. What a reach
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:00 AM
Apr 2016

George II

(67,782 posts)
39. "Linked"? Very clever. That is a REAL stretch.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:11 AM
Apr 2016

Omaha Steve

(100,275 posts)
40. Locking after a review by forum hosts
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:18 AM
Apr 2016

Statement of Purpose

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton campaign chief li...