General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow can progressives help steer African Americans away from religion?
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LostOne4Ever (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Should we even try?
Are we helping people escape the negative effects of religion, or are we being "benevolent racists" if we continue to publically and venomously attack beliefs that are dear to already oppressed people?
The sad Cincinnati tragedy is the latest situation where African American religious beliefs have come into conflict with white progressive anti-religious sentiment. And it is a conflict for me personally. Do I say anything anti-religious to people I love? How far can we push it before we alienate the most important and faithful Democrats in the United States of America?
stone space
(6,498 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Should we or shouldn't we?
I am sorry, I do not like easy questions and simple answers.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I wish being a flawless person was easier.
It seems SO freaking easy for so many others. Alas, I have a bad habit of trying to see the world omni-directionally, so the moral questions that are so easy for others are a major challenge to me.
bvf
(6,604 posts)personal challenges to address that are more immediate.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)The more they think they don't, the more they really do. Self improvement is a lifelong task, not a one time event.
For better or worse (probably worse), I fell into this method.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Are Xi approaches to religion politically correct, in other nations?
bvf
(6,604 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)redwitch
(14,947 posts)Jeez.
RandySF
(59,238 posts)There's so much to say here I don't know where to begin. And people wonder why Bernie does not do well among African American voters.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Personally, it is one of the biggest conflicts of my life. What can I do to be a better human being? Do I offer my own opinions on religion to others, or keep my "mouth" shut so as not to offend anyone?
RandySF
(59,238 posts)between expressing your own opinion of religion and thinking you ought o go and 'save' a whole community whose faith is the among of their worried (which you would know if you followed the news over the last couple of centuries).
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)And why I am not cruelly mocking Ms Greggs like SO MANY other people in the interwebs are.
dilby
(2,273 posts)I mean I love religion and all religions and I encourage people to find their belief or non belief, telling people that you need to be an atheist to be progressive is pretty much a whole bunch of bullshit.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I grew up primarily as a Baptist, but was exposed to other religions, and non-religion, at an early age.
I can find some wonderful things in religion. But I can also find a lot of oppressive, hateful, exclusionary, even violent things in religion.
A lot of people all across the Internet are giving Ms Greggs a hard time about what she said regarding God and her son. And it reminded me of this personal conflict that I have had for a long time: do I have the right to criticize what I consider harmful beliefs?
dilby
(2,273 posts)It should not be a concern of yours. In a world where everything costs money faith is free, please don't advocate for taking that away from people.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I think those of us who are not religious need to CTFO on the venomous name-calling of Christians.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)at being called bigoted over skin color, or at least distressed that it shows, have no problem spilling the most malignant prejudice for all to see over religion.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)The Roman Catholic Church preaching against the use of condoms in Africa helped the spread of HIV there. The Islamic teachings that unbelievers are kuffars who must be subdued has consequences in Somalia, Iraq, Syria, San Bernardino,..
Beliefs inform actions which would be better if no religion was involved.
And charity existed before the abrahamic religions, and takes place in non abrahamic regions.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)For most, it cost them their critical thought.
brush
(53,871 posts)potone
(1,701 posts)And I don't think that this is a very promising thread.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)A gorilla was killed to save the child. The mother publically thanked God for saving her child. And the Internet went crazy because of it.
For a prime example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027866910
brush
(53,871 posts)have to do with weaning AAs off religion.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Perhaps that misunderstanding is why so many people are trashing the mother over her "Thank God" statement? Would they quit if they knew that the mother and child are African American?
brush
(53,871 posts)of religious folks in the different races in this country.
I know a lot of AAs that aren't particularly religious, same with whites and I would venture to say with Asian Americans and Latino Americans too.
We don't have a monopoly on being religious of non-religious.
The people that go to church, go to church. And the ones that don't, don't often in the same family.
Persuasion either way would be futile.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)Comments I have read concerning this issue and the "Thank god" comment by the mother had nothing to do with the racial background.
Most are pointing out the conundrum of the statement against the backdrop of reality.
riversedge
(70,306 posts)badly hurt, then folks would have outrage at the zoo. How the child got there and where were the parents was not the issue when a quick decision had to be made. What if it were your child in the grips of a gorilla?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)When I take a break from DU for a few days...
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Please don't leave us alone with ourselves! Look at the sloppy messes we create without adult supervision.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)threads about black folks in the news for controversial reasons tend to run off the rails really quick...I'm only speaking from experience here...
Usually myself or someone else will help reel the discussion back in the boat, but this one is so far down the abyss I'm going to punt.
Bucky
(54,068 posts)I'm guessing the OP thought religion made this woman throw her baby at the gorilla
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Some supposedly forward thinking people, on the other hand, are taking advantage of her statement to trash Christianity in some very aggressive ways. It is rude, and it is inappropriate. Just like the OP.
I just got a little clumsy and cranky pointing that out.
StarTrombone
(188 posts)they need care and feedin' and cultivatin'.
And that takes time.
But that was only a movie
this is the internet
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Maybe you can bring some toilet paper along and show them how to use it, too. God only knows what else they're waiting for you to instruct them upon.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Alas, a lot of people are doing the equivalent of just that.
A few months ago, I made what I thought was a light, comical post about religious tolerance and got my ass kicked for doing it.
It is frustrating.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)in the saddle is at work here.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)1. Allow people their church and religion
2. If you are not AA yourself, be quiet
3. People see your religion by how you live
4. 'Telling' people what to do with religion will turn them the opposite way
If progressives want to influence the Black Church, start after school programs, start nutrition programs in poverty areas, set up scholarships for high school graduates -- i.e. be progressive in the community. Never attack beliefs. Ask what needs to be done. Holy Toledo! This is not hard. Ask, don't tell. If you are anti religion yourself, OK. Some progressives are believers and some are not. Faith is not the standard for being progressive. Caring is the standard.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I've been hoping for some sanity after reading all the crap on Facebook, Twitter, and here.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)to my way of thinking. I may disagree with people. My father is an evangelical Christian and I disagree with him on a lot of religious topics, but I have never once tried to convince him to think the way I do. It's always been a pet peeve of mine when Christians try to do it to me, so I try not to do it to them. What's that saying about the golden rule?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)This is IMPORTANT!
potone
(1,701 posts)But then, she always does! I am going to miss this family when they leave the White House.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... that I am confident is a closet atheist.
He plays the game because he needs the votes.
Obviously, I can't prove it. Just my $.02.
Warms my heart in any case.
applegrove
(118,793 posts)been co-opt ed by the GOP and radicals. Go after the big guys. Not the people. For many religion makes them happy (the walk the walkers). And I don't have the answer to how the universe was created...do you?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I have incomplete knowledge, and I will for the rest of my life.
People who have "THE ANSWER" scare the crap out of me.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)are a bigger problem. But I'm mostly just basing this on the body count of the victims.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)As researched by Edwin Hubble, Stephen Hawking, and many others.
If a better theory comes along, this one will be discarded, unlike unprovable beliefs.
applegrove
(118,793 posts)to be before it explided. I believe in it but even it doesn't explain the start.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)It was called the Friedmann theory. Edwin Hubble observed red shift, in a galaxy expanding away from us, which was one of the first pieces of evidence to prove that the universe was expanding. It continues to expand after 13.7 billion years. This was published in 1925.
Start here. Neil deGrasse Tyson, for one.
Neil deGrasse Tyson--The discovery of the 4 degree Kelvin background radiation in the universe, in 1964. Robert Woodrow Wilson was awarded the 1976 Nobel Prize in Physics along with Arno Allan Penzias. This is leftover radiation from the Big Bang:
Fla Dem
(23,760 posts)I understand the big bang theory and the expanding universe. Just would like to know how all the conditions were created to accommodate the big bang. Before it there was nothing and then there was something.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)Stick to the 'how' and you will go much farther.
In any case, the odds that it all began with a magical father figure who focused nearly exclusively on the herding cultures within a 600 mile radius of a spot planet earth 2000 years ago is unlikely.
To put it extremely mildly.
mr blur
(7,753 posts)Do you have any idea how these things work?
For many religious people killing people makes them happy. Chopping heads off. Bombing abortion clinics. Subjugating women. Beating up gay people. Invading Iraq. Molesting children. You know, the "walk the walkers".
Because I can't explain how the universe started I'm supposed to believe that all superstitious drivel about the "creation" of everything has equal validity?
Perhaps you don't think that science is important - It was the symbolism that mattered?
applegrove
(118,793 posts)That religion makes them happy. Of course the radicals and used GOP preachers need to be fought against. But religion is a human way to be. One of many.
applegrove
(118,793 posts)democrat? And a bigot?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I am a flawed human being. I am a skeptical human being. I love EVERYONE on Earth, and want them to have a happier, healthier, more prosperous life. So from that perspective, yes, I am a progressive Democrat.
And I like asking questions that bring people out of their comfort zone to try to make them consider a wide range of ideas and opinions. Not because it is fun (OK, it is a little fun) but because it is important.
JI7
(89,274 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)That thread, and other responses around the 'net has upset me a lot.
So I wanted to turn it around and turn it up to 11.
yardwork
(61,712 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)... almost as a "get out of bigotry free" card.
I was already feeling cranky from a cold I am fighting. Then I came upon the thread where Ms Gregg was brutally insulted over a comment she made in nervous gratitude that her child was unhurt. As well, there was the thread talking about how racists don't know they are racist.
It reminded me all over again how many people I have read here and talked to in real life who act like people of color are "uninformed voters" or "suffering from Stockholm Syndrome". And how people of religious faith are all monsters and/or morons. We sneer at the right wing, at Republicans, at traditional racists, and yet we continue our own "we are your friends, do what we tell you, believe what we tell you, we know what is best for you" attitudes. I am not saying it is the majority of us, but it IS present, and it is harmful, and I think everyone should take some time now and again to self-evaluate after stripping away our egos.
yardwork
(61,712 posts)Seriously, what the fuck? This OP is deeply offensive to a wide range of people, and you did it because you were offended by something else, so you thought the right approach was to throw gasoline around and burn the place down?
Self delete and apologize.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)#whitesaviour
#saveusnegroesfromjesus
#butwhataboutmlk
Take them as slaves and now take the religion they were ALLOWED to replace our own culture with, WHOA OMGISTHISREAL?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Please check out the rest of my responses here for a clearer picture of where I really stand.
I am not the one trashing this poor woman after a frightening ordeal.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Perhaps get them to consider the harmful impact of their words.
And if it helps me morally grow and exorcise some of my own effed up opinions in the process, so much the better.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Especially growing up white and being surrounded by A LOT of hate and stupidity.
Too often I think things, even say things, that I know are wrong and hurtful. But it is like this BS is burned into my consciousness, and it is more of a struggle to free myself than it should be.
Hopefully, with conscious attention and opening myself up to a range of people, I can succeed and feel better about myself, and improve my opinions and attitudes.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)10/10, would slap my head again.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Self embarrassment and pissing off people seems to be mine.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)SunSeeker
(51,719 posts)Should we even try?
Are we helping people escape the negative effects of religion, or are we being "benevolent racists" if we continue to publically and venomously attack beliefs that are dear to already oppressed people?
The sad Cincinnati tragedy is the latest situation where African American religious beliefs have come into conflict with white progressive anti-religious sentiment. And it is a conflict for me personally. Do I say anything anti-religious to people I love? How far can we push it before we alienate the most important and faithful Democrats in the United States of America?
What does the Cincinnati tragedy have to do with the woman being African American? What difference does her race make to her religiousness? Do you not see that suggesting progressives "steer African Americans," like they are mindless chattel, is offensive?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I have tried to make that clear.
Alas, like so many other things, where I have tried to fire up some unused neurons (in myself as well as others) and attack hypocrisy, I guess I bombed out on this one as well.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)You do realize that people who think there are races are called racists!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)but what the fuck what you talking about OP?
Also, wth does the shooting at the Gorilla Zoo have to do with African Americans and the "white progressive anti-religious sentiment"?
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Like helping steer everyone away from religions.
EllieBC
(3,042 posts)Because like everyone else, African Americans are perfectly capable to informing themselves and coming to their own decisions.
Your OP is just so much white saviour that it is damn racist.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Alas, that is how I see the venomous reactions towards Ms Gregg and her religious beliefs.
There is too much (supposedly) benevolent racism and anti-religion coming from our side. I could not hold back after reading the vile thread mentioned elsewhere in this thread.
raging moderate
(4,309 posts)I think perhaps your OP just was too straight-faced. Maybe next time, write it out and edit it ahead of time?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)But actually adding the sarcasm thingie would have distracted from what I was trying to do... create a WTF moment in people.
Oh, well. I suppose if no one else gets anything positive from this thread, I sure have.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Because asking how to " steer African Americans away from religion?" is a disgusting statement.
We have freedom of religion in this country and it is none of our business how any group chooses to worship.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)This one is hopefully firing people up to recognize their own racism, cattiness, etc. so they can try to overcome it.
Even if it does not help anyone else, it certainly has worked for me.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Including me.
6chars
(3,967 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)We need to offer our opinions with respect and appreciation for others, even if we think they are incorrect. And we need to quit calling people "Jay-sus freaks" and all the other horrible names and sentiments that are so casually tossed around. It is probably not going to change them, it will just drive us further apart.
(i am aware of the irony)
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)this is the most intolerant bigoted post i have seen here in a very long while. you do know you are posting on DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, right?
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)As far as "the most intolerant bigoted post i have seen here in a very long while", I see those all the time here. One in particular really set me off tonight. But in this particular case, the intent was the exact opposite.
Perhaps I fell down hard in the process, and it is not saying what I tried to say and not doing what I hoped it would do.
It really sucks being imperfect sometimes.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)what you consider a superior thought form or beliefs over those of others just as much as many "religions". this is why it is so offensive.
it is even more offensive when it is a white person proselytizing their superior beliefs on people of color and is also called colonization - whether by a government or a religious organization - or a slave owner.
it takes many generations to overcome these forms of mind and body control when one's language and culture and even memory of one's origins have been erased and been replaced with an indoctrination of authoritarianism.
many generations.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Yes, I admit, the OP was deliberately controversial.
Throughout the rest of the thread, I tried to explain my motivation to call out racism and whatever the proper term for nasty anti-religious hate speech is, but I guess it flopped.
You live, you learn. Hopefully.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)So hard for us to hear tone over the web
mahina
(17,701 posts)What does anybody else have to say about someone's religion?
None of my business, nor is it any of yours.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)"white progressive anti-religious sentiment" is a legitimate concern? As a white progressive I am astonished anyone would consider a statement like yours.
You of course are free to say anti-religious things to people you love but don't be surprised if you don't get invited around for dinner after that.
In the words of the prophet Mind Your Own Business
Or was that Dear Abby? Whatever.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Just really, really offensive.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I am trying to prove a point. In doing so, I made a lot of people uncomfortable. You have to break some eggs to make an omelet.
Some people get it. Some don't.
yardwork
(61,712 posts)Warpy
(111,352 posts)Face it, it's a rotten thing to do to anyone.
What we can hope is that when the sky doesn't fall as all people are given the civil rights protections they should have as citizens, they'll moderate their own beliefs. Or not. Their choice.
There are some things that do more harm than good. Meddling with core beliefs by outsiders is one of them.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts).... and abject stupidity among society and their own ranks.
on edit: Reading through your responses it appears that you may have written this to be pithy and to illustrate racism, elitism and abject stupidity within some on the left .... but in all honesty, on its face, the OP reads like a sickening racist screed
RogueTrooper
(4,665 posts)yardwork
(61,712 posts)Quayblue
(1,045 posts)What in the damn holy hell ....what the fuck is going on around here? Oh wait . your meme says it. Never mind. Ugh.
ileus
(15,396 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)Oh, wait, our Constitution already covers that -- both my right to dance under the full moon light, and yours to think I'm a kook for doing so and not be forced to do it yourself.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)in the country.
A right to be Black without shaming, and a right to education, jobs, housing, able to afford clean water and fresh food. not killed by police with impunity, flooding their community with guns...anything that would keep them from leaning on religion so desperately. This is what keeps them on their knees praying morning, noon and night. When you fix all of these things, maybe then there is a chance to ween them off religion.
yardwork
(61,712 posts)A jury allowed this blatant racism to stand. Seriously, WTF?
malaise
(269,182 posts)It is the dilemma of the two sides of religion - backward and superstitious preventing objective thinking -leaving everything to an imaginary friend in the sky and the side that provided education, networking and social mobility. The same problem exists across the Caribbean.
Orrex
(63,225 posts)What a fucked-up OP.
moriah
(8,311 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: You alerted on a post which was already alerted
Mail Message
On Tue May 31, 2016, 07:06 AM you sent an alert on the following post:
How can progressives help steer African Americans away from religion?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027868548
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
This is so totally over the top, to suggest that an African-American woman thanking God for the fact her child lived means we should stop people from believing in God. I don't have words.
JURY RESULTS
Someone else already alerted on this post before you alerted on it, and only the first alert was sent to a Jury. A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of the post on Mon May 30, 2016, 11:00 PM, and voted 3-4 to keep IT. Please note that even though your alert was not sent to a Jury, it has been forwarded to the Administrators who review all alerts.
Thank you.
Response to FrodosPet (Original post)
laundry_queen This message was self-deleted by its author.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Or a race that has a strong religious tradition that has empowered rather than shackled them once they could run their own churches?
Did you forget that Dr. King wasn't a medical doctor, but a preacher and religious scholar?
Look, you can think you are being a "benevolent racist" by letting people have faith that gets them through hard times if you want, but you aren't being benevolent by looking down on people for having faith. How the hell did her thanking God harm a single living soul?
If you want to go after people using faith to harm, go check out the Quiverfull movement, or the FLDS, or the Westboro Baptist Church. If you'll notice, they're awfully goddamn pale.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I'm just the poor schmuck saying "we need to be better than this". And yes, I am including myself in "we".
moriah
(8,311 posts)As I said in another post, the Constitution gives me the right to dance under the full moonlight if I will it, and gives you the right to think I'm a kook and not be forced to participate.
But atheists often fall victim to the same arrogance that people who think their faith is the One True Way have, and it's easier to justify intellectual arrogance than it is to see that the human psyche has had faith, religion, myth, spirituality, and other "superstitious nonsense" for its entirety of existence as sentient beings, if archaeology is any clue. Jungian archetypes may indicate less a "collective unconscious" if that sounds too mystical for you, but perhaps are indicators of humanity's brain wiring, yet their near universality is undeniable.
If you don't need to believe there's some greater reason than you understand for things that are shitty or express gratitude when things that could have been shittier are less shitty, that's fine for you. But... shit happens.
And you haven't experienced my shit, and perhaps not seen potential shit averted and thought things that may be wishful thinking but are harmless (if any Witch could influence matters from beyond the grave to save her only grandchild, it was the deceased Witch whose grandson is only alive now because her daughter-in-law was scheduled for an ultrasound because they mistakenly thought they saw two possible Downs markers on a prior one -- she hadn't known she was in premature labor or starting to experience a likely placental abrupture, just thought he was kicking hard).
But don't judge my way to deal with the craziness of this world -- to believe there must be a reason. If you had walked in my moccasins, you might have developed a similar unproven and impossible to prove view that keeps you here, going, and somewhat sane, too.
Crunchy Frog
(26,646 posts)traditionally African American churches. Don't tell anyone that you're a Democrat.
This way you can do your part to reduce the tragic gorilla zoo shootings in this country.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Thanking God that her child was safe. However you didn't word this very well.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I was hoping to stir up people, especially us so-called "New Atheists" (personally, I am agnostic, not atheist) to look inward. I am starting to realize that perhaps it is having the opposite effect?
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)and I would NEVER post anything like that OP. Nor would I think it's my "right" to steer an entire race away from religion or anything else. I get that you were trying to stir things up, but there are other ways, really. Yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater is not cool.
And please, PLEASE do not do the "I'm not perfect" thing again. We know you're not perfect, just like everyone else.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Yes, trying to "save" black people from religion is textbook example of racism. So is the belief that black people are of such a gelatinous constitution that without religion they would just fall to pieces.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)And yes, you are being a "benevolent racist".
Par the course for privileged white "New Atheists".
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Why you see them as white males is strange.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)If not it's just sad.
onenote
(42,768 posts)Like a lot of people, my initial reaction to the OP was WTF. But having read his/her comments throughout and seeing the comparison between the comments in this thread and some of the comments disparaging the mother of the child that fell into the gorilla enclosure, I think this is actually a thought-provoking discussion and I offer kudos to the OP for being brave enough to go out on a limb to get that discussion started. Yes, the OP was offensive sounding, but only as a way of holding up a mirror to the holier than thou (or maybe its the less holier than thou) crowd that acts as if one cannot be a person of faith and a progressive. Which would come as a shock to some of the great progressives of our times.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)We definitely need to learn to respect others a lot more than we currently are.
Yes, it shook a lot of people up. I hope at least a few will take advantage to reconsider how we are treating too many people of color and of faith.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)But straight up, a lot of people don't.
We ALL need to become wiser, more caring individuals.
Bucky
(54,068 posts)Dood, 1st Amendment.
Here's some religion for you: go google "Mote in your own eye first" and see what Jesus has to say to people like you.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)RogueTrooper
(4,665 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)You guys are such a joke
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Calling people "Jay-sus Freaks", or saying people are "low information voters" with "Stockholm Syndrome" is no joke.
Alas, I had to go to extreme measures to point that out, so that we can recognize and hopefully take corrective action within our own attitudes and opinions.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,750 posts)Just this ==>
ProfessorGAC
(65,194 posts)I cannot believe the number of people for whom the point of the OP was a total swing and miss.
That great sucking sound wasn't jobs going to central america. It was the point whooshing over the heads of a lot posters on this thread.
TwilightZone
(25,485 posts)A post equating AA support of Hillary Clinton to Stockholm Syndrome got dozens of recs and was in the conversation for days.
This, frankly, isn't much more over-the-top. My first thought was that it was being intentionally so (confirmed by the poster's follow-up comments, of course), but I can understand why it was taken literally by many. This place has turned into a cesspool.
ProfessorGAC
(65,194 posts)It should have been obvious this wasn't a literal statement. But, no!
yardwork
(61,712 posts)Calling out an entire minority group to prove a point reeks of privilege.
ProfessorGAC
(65,194 posts)So, you've now proven you missed the point. The OP is defending the minority group's right to believe in whatever they want to believe in.
The OP, as stated in multiple follow up posts, is hammering those who instantly jumped to the "lady whose kid was involved" is a religious nut. The OP then stated, would you ask a minority group to give up their religion?
Since that's clearly not what anybody here thinks, it was important to point out these people are african-american. If that changes the thinking about the woman's religious affiliation, well it should!
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)that sentence alone pretty much means the OP was calling out a particular minority group.
Might as well have started the sentence with "I'm not racist but..."
As for latter posts, I also call 'bullshit'. A poster's opening comment sets the tone for everything else. It's like that "I'm not racist but..." comment thinking "If I just can clear up the air after I said that utterly bullshit comment"
yardwork
(61,712 posts)The zoo is clearly at fault. Little kids shouldn't be able to climb into animal enclosures. I have no idea if the parents were negligent it not. Either way, it should not have been that easy for the child to get into the enclosure. So the OP's shot goes wildly wide, offending countless people in the process.
Again, it is the definition of privilege to use a minority group in this way. I use the word "use" deliberately.
betsuni
(25,638 posts)Response to FrodosPet (Original post)
LanternWaste This message was self-deleted by its author.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)If not, should have.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)WTF????
Seriously, do you need to have a bunch of brave white progressives ride in on their white stallions and save the day by "steering" those ignorant negros where they need to go but are just not smart enough to get their on their own?
Really?????
This has to be the most racist condescending post I've ever seen here. Assuming that the path a certain person of a certain racial identity choose is bad for them, that you know better and that you can or should "steer" them away like a sheepdog herding sheep.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Considering how many racist condescending posts there are here, that is saying something.
Most of us here are fundamentally good, well meaning, but flawed individuals. Sometimes we need to look in the mirror if we really want to improve ourselves and our respect for and treatment of others.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Wtf were you thinking when you wrote that title?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I am NOT saying what people think I am saying. My target is not people of color. It is people who believe that don't realize they are bigots.
yardwork
(61,712 posts)You don't seem to understand how offensive it is to call out an entire minority group, using their lives as a rhetorical device just to tell DU how dumb and narrow-minded we are. Your attitude reeks of privilege. You know best. And never mind how many people you use - yes, use - to make your point. It's all about you and your point. THIS is the essence of privilege.
TrappedInUtah
(87 posts)This is possibly the weirdest and most strangely offensive topic I've seen in a while. "Us noble white people need to save the ignorant African Americans from their obsolete beliefs". Sounds pretty racist too me.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)That's why we need to NOT do it. And why we, as individuals, need to examine our beliefs with a self-critical eye.
LexVegas
(6,099 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Oddly enough, I was thinking about AA religion just last week. I came to the conclusion that since slaves were not allowed to practice their African spiritual traditions, they incorporated elements of them into Christianity -- things like call and response, thus weaving a rich religious tapestry. You would shred that tapestry?!
still_one
(92,411 posts)religion to STFU?
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Many never do.
"God " apparently saw fit to save this particular child, but the other 29,000 that die of starvation daily are on their own.
Yay, god!
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)It's like asking, should African Americans help steer godless progressives to religion?
TacoD
(581 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,865 posts)Are you suggesting African Americans are incapable of determining for themselves what to believe, and that (white) progressives ought to go out and "enlighten" them?
What a bunch of crap.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)Why not try live and let live...it is the American way...and if people did this...there would be no conflict.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone being a Christian. However the problem is that there are leaders in the Christian faith who manipulate the bible for profit and to hate on those they do not understand.
It's bullshit you think we need to somehow 'save' the African-American community from religion and that you assume someone can't be a progressive and also have religion.
BTW if Jesus was around today he would be one of us. In his time he was very progressive in his ideologies. Paul fucked things up with bringing us organized religion.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I respect everyone's religion or lack of it. I feel people have the right to worship (or not worship) the God of their choice. What I have issue with is when someone uses that religion to infringe on other people's rights. I know some religious people feel the bible says that homosexuality is a 'sin'. Fine if someone wants to read the bible that way and think Homosexuals are sinners that's their choice to be an idiot (well they are, Jesus never said anything against homosexuality). But when they use that religion to infringe on the civil rights of others then I do have an issue.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=crimson]It is the consensus of the Hosting forum at this time to LOCK this thread as a violation of the SOP.[/font]
[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#dcdcdc; padding-bottom:5px; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom:none; border-radius:0.4615em 0.4615em 0em 0em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025307978[div class="excerpt" style="background-color:#f0f0f0; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top:none; border-radius:0em 0em 0.4615em 0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]
- RELIGION
Threads about current events related to religion, and threads about church-state issues are permitted under normal circumstances.
Threads about the existence/non-existence of God, threads discussing the merits (or lack thereof) of religion in general, and threads discussing the truth/untruth of religious dogma are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted under Religion.
Open discussion of religion is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.
[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=crimson]If you wish to post this thread on DU it is the recommendation of the Hosting Forum to post it in a different forum or group. Possibly consider reposting in one of the religion groups.
Thank you.[/font]