General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow about this???
We change the law to have two voting days.
Saturday & Sunday.
All early voting goes bye-bye.
Two days. I see nothing wrong with this
and if you can't get your ass in gear
with TWO days. Too bad.
What do you think??
lame54
(35,343 posts)Early voting stays
Two days, on a weekend, is plenty.
niyad
(113,778 posts)restrict voting? On what grounds? For what reason? Just the opposite of what should be happening.
brush
(53,968 posts)imagine how much longer the lines would be if all voting was crammed into two days.
No way should we get rid of early voting. That what republicans want.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Two days is plenty of time. You can even
make it two continuous days.
The point is, this option leaves no excuses.
brush
(53,968 posts)Again, you see the lines for early voting now. They'll be twenty or more times longer if everyone has to vote in two days.
And with covid out there, who needs that?
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Two days is plenty. If you want your vote to count
you will make the time. I always have for decades.
This is not something "at their convenience".
You either want to or you don't.
brush
(53,968 posts)Judging from all the responses on this OP, everyone disagrees with you.
relayerbob
(6,561 posts)If you don't like getting everyone's vote, then perhaps you are really rooting for another party
Ms. Toad
(34,124 posts)The shortest line I'm aware of in my county was 1 hour. Early voting has been going on since October 6 - 25 days in a row, solid 1-3 hour waits to vote from day 1.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)What if you're a nurse, and you work 12 hour shifts. On Saturday and Sunday. How exactly is two days plenty of time for someone like that?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)cut back drastically in a lot of states, or parts of states. How many hours are you willing to stand in line? 2? 4? 12? In snow and freezing rain? Without shelter from the sun when it's 90 degrees? Oh, and at the risk of too much information, don't know about you but I can't go even 6 hours without needing to pee.
Right now, even with early voting that's a lot more than two days, I'm seeing reports of hours' long lines in far too many places. Just two days, and people will be in line for more than 24 hours in some places. Hope you figure out how to provide the necessary portapotties.
elleng
(131,300 posts)STATES have the authority to determine terms of elections.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)niyad
(113,778 posts)Mariana
(14,861 posts)And things have changed. Once upon a time we didn't have early voting or widely available mail-in voting. Now we do.
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)Exactly the opposite of what should be done. We need to make it easier for people to vote. Not harder.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)It makes things very clear.
niyad
(113,778 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Voting is what makes the US the US.
Is it too much to ask a citizen to make
the effort to follow pretty simple rules??
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)Simple rules. Too bad for those who do shift work.
I really am tired of the voting proposals that have zero understanding that not everyone has an office job from 8am to 5pm and always has weekends and holidays off.
Nexus2
(1,261 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)Especially the religious commitments.
niyad
(113,778 posts)It most certainly is not democratic.
Tribetime
(4,716 posts)I think they need to make the voting early voting at least four weeks prior and have multiple locations and also include mail-in voting. Not everyone is able to make it to the polls and just 2 days I think of the elderly
JI7
(89,283 posts)Mariana
(14,861 posts)that wouldn't be a good reason to make it harder to vote.
Tink41
(537 posts)Rarely concern themselves with other people's laziness. That's suspect Republican words. You know there are always tip-offs, bad spelling, incorrect words (Dam vs Damn). And worrying about ones perceived motivation, among other things........
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)Not good.
relayerbob
(6,561 posts)Speed is not the issue, accuracy is
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Following the set, legal, rules.
relayerbob
(6,561 posts)No one said break rules. Make the rulews work so that as many people can vote as is physically possible.
Why do you oppose that?
progree
(10,930 posts)relayerbob
(6,561 posts)What generally did it say?
Iggo
(47,586 posts)Which is what I believe the person you replied to was getting at.
relayerbob
(6,561 posts)Thanks
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)People are following the set, legal, rules.
You just want them to follow different, set, legal, rules.
world wide wally
(21,758 posts)Every registered voter gets mailed a ballot about 3 weeks before election day that they can return by mail or drop into one of hundreds of drop boxes around the state.
Fast, easy, and convenient. Not to mention fraud free for those "concerned" Republicans.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)There also have been quite a few issues with mail in voting.
world wide wally
(21,758 posts)LisaL
(44,980 posts)NT
marlakay
(11,529 posts)And they get you one, we do same kind of voting in Oregon works great.
niyad
(113,778 posts)DanieRains
(4,619 posts)Silly.
Took 5 minutes to vote and 10 to drive it to drop box.
relayerbob
(6,561 posts)Vote by mail, vote in person, vote early and vote on election day and vote online all should be allowed, and each person use the process they are most comfortable with.
LisaL
(44,980 posts)NT
Thank you for your response.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)regular work days. With our "progressive" world running on a 24/7 schedule, almost every profession - especially those dealing with the public - need daily coverage. For example: hospital personnel, grocery personnel, protective services, retail personnel, to name a few. The same argument can be made for selecting any two days...there's always someone for whom they won't be suitable. A wider range works better.
IMO, I like the combo in play now: mail-in ballots, Early Voting, and Election Day itself. This chaos that we are experiencing this year is a tRump manufacture, by design. He wants to make it as difficult, as inaccessible, as confusing, and as challengeable as he possibly can to bolster his concept that voting is fraudulent. Once he's gone and life resumes some normalcy, we won't be dealing with this nonsense, the system will work, and we will be able to vote with confidence again.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)But it is in the regular work week.
Pay a person to vote that day if they
can be shown to normally work that
day, (Sat-Sun)
I have no problem with that.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)What if they have the kind of job where they simply cannot be spared from the workplace? Again, the example of nurses comes readily to mind.
zackymilly
(2,375 posts)Response to zackymilly (Reply #22)
Post removed
relayerbob
(6,561 posts)and set up on-line voting also. Make voting easier than ordering crap from Amazon or installing a new video game.
Your proposal makes it harder for many, many people, from weekend workers to elderly, ill or otherwise limited people. Basically, it helps disenfranchise the poor
csziggy
(34,139 posts)Absolute minimum for voting, longer would be better.
I remember when voting was only one day and restricted to certain polling places. The polling place for my precinct was a church down a dirt road. Not only did I hate having to go to a place of worship to vote, with all their religious icons all over the place, I hated the crowds.
But back then, you had to have a reason for getting an absentee ballot so I could not avoid going to that church if I was going to exercise my right to vote. I voted absentee once - against Nixon - when I was a student but still registered in my home town. College students then were not allowed to use their "temporary" residences to register to vote, even after they moved out of the dorms.
Talitha
(6,635 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)IrishEyes
(3,275 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)office job with weekends and holidays off.
What if you're a nurse and you work 12 hour shifts and are scheduled that Saturday and Sunday? I guess it's just too bad for you, right? Or break your leg on Friday afternoon and simply cannot get out those too days. Too bad? Really?
Good early voting along with good mail-in voting is far, far better.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Or the Government can make Sat/Sun legal
days off for voting.
I'm not saying I have all the answers right now
but they do exist.
Just MHO.
JI7
(89,283 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,926 posts)Somehow, I don't think that's a particularly good idea.
You really, really don't understand that there really are those whose work shift is such that getting to vote, if election day is only one or two days, getting off to vote simply can't happen.
Every time someone suggests that the current Election Day itself be a National Holiday, again, is someone who always gets holidays off and hasn't a clue about all those who don't. No wonder a lot of people still don't vote. It's not because they want to, it's that in a state that limits voting days, getting the time off may well be impossible.
I am so very glad I live in a state (New Mexico) that has excellent early voting. Which I did two weeks ago. Actually, I moved here from Kansas which also has good early voting. I haven't voted on Election Day in about twenty years.
BlueInPhilly
(870 posts)Early voting is more convenient for people who do not have a M-F, 8 to 5 job. You are being ratio'd in case you haven't noticed
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)What is ratio'd
Rorey
(8,445 posts)It doesn't make sense to move backward, and that's what the system you're suggesting would do.
canetoad
(17,208 posts)Is always on a Saturday. Early voting everywhere for three weeks is standard.
Welcome to my world.
denbot
(9,901 posts)But Im open to greater pre-election voting, making Election Day a National holiday, with mandatory double time pay for anyone who works at all on Election Day.
GoneOffShore
(17,342 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,342 posts)In person early voting starts 6 weeks out. Walk up voter registration, day of voting with proper documentation.
Election Week-end starts Friday ends Monday 21:00 and declared a national holiday weekend.
Traceable paper ballots for all races. A standardised ballot nationwide.
Results by Tuesday 09:00. Certification by Friday. Swearing in on Saturday. No lame duck sessions. You lose the election, you lose your office, you lose your power.
Campaigning to start 3 months out. Publicly financed. NO PACS.
Mandatory voting, though that also means that you can vote 'None' but you have to vote.
GeorgeGist
(25,326 posts)JI7
(89,283 posts)JI7
(89,283 posts)Vote by mail is needed for many.
NBachers
(17,170 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,344 posts)a rusty implement, held sideways.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)and they should be able to mail back or leave it at a voting box. This said, I also think that all post offices should be required during voting season to have extra staff who only do ballot work. Then, I also think that the finale voting day should be a Federal holiday.
That would be a good start but as we know more would need to be done to protect all votes.
rownesheck
(2,343 posts)Many people work retail jobs. Try to get one of those days off when everyone else is asking those same days off. Millions would be disenfranchised.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)It sounds like a solution without a problem.
I think anything that actually makes it harder for people to vote is a bad idea.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)Why eliminate it
panader0
(25,816 posts)You certainly have not thought this through.
70 replies and 0 recommendations. Get the message?
Mariana
(14,861 posts)LizBeth
(9,953 posts)and think that will allow things to run smoothly and easy peasy? Republicans would love your plan.
lettucebe
(2,337 posts)when it's easier. There's no reason to suspend early voting. November should be voting month.
Iggo
(47,586 posts)Wednesdays
(17,462 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Expand mail-in and drop-box voting for any registered citizen.
Ms. Toad
(34,124 posts)Aside from the fact that a lot of low-income workers work both days (restaurant/grocery store/gas station/etc.), it would be nearly impossible to protect the vote.
I cover one polling location3 precincts (all in the same physical location). I can't find a good easy number for polling locations - but pulling up a random county there were about 20 - putting Ohio locations at perhaps 1500 - 2000. In many polling locations, there are two voter protection volunteers assigned - so perhaps 3000 for election day. The expected hours for volunteering are from 6:00 AM - 9:00 PM. Doing that two days in a row (sandwiched between two full work weeks - not going to happen for many of us So having two full days would close to double the number needed.
That's just voter protection. In the polling location where I vote, there are 6 volunteers. So now you need 5-10,000 pollworkers - roughly the same hours as voter protection. These have to be party members, so you need 11,000 democrats or so to run the polls and protect the vote.
(This contrasts with early voting which is proctored by paid workers, and there are typically 1-2 voter protection workers per county for each day of early voting.)
ecstatic
(32,781 posts)That works for me and most others.
mcar
(42,439 posts)Vote by mail, early voting over several weekends, drive through voting. Election day a national holiday.
Iggo
(47,586 posts)Democrats want to make it easier to vote so that more people will vote.
Republicans want to make it harder to vote so that fewer people will vote.
I'm for making it so easy to vote that every registered voter votes in every election.
Meowmee
(5,164 posts)We need more early voting, more centers, more options. The actual election day(s) should be a holiday.
pecosbob
(7,547 posts)that print a paper receipt, open for a month, night and day....not a temporary assemblage of people and equipment that always seems to be cobbled together at the last moment, and by the way subject to all sorts of tom-foolery.