After some analysis of them, he, (as well as the GOP in general) relies heavily on utilizing fallacies over facts. In Trump's case, they can be delivered one after the other and in composed packages based on his habitual forms of distortion.
While you can overdo the analysis, Trump speaks in what I would call "anti-logic". While this is not such an uncommon, rhetorical and political strategy, in this case, it really emphasizes deflection from knowledge, supported facts, discovering the truth, etc. The reason this is crucial now is that we see that we are really getting diffused, (not just divided) and straying farther and farther away from any kind of cohesive, cultural engagement. The Internet has its value, but this is may be a result of its detrimental aspects.
Where is the fault, though, really here? I don't think it would be a form of "blaming the victim" if we contend that it is the capacity of the population to recognize the uses of fallacies, (as if second nature) and not accept them as beliefs or by way of emotional reactions that is a problem. Perhaps the overuse of them will be a schooling by way of repetition?
I wouldn't expect that everyone has to become a logician or philosopher in order to be invulnerable, but if our body politic were more focused on the process, (the how rather than merely what, where, when and why) of what is presented, then that would provide a shield or antidote to the various forms of manipulation, propaganda and chicanery that goes on. It would also force debate towards a more pragmatic focus on what is actually going on and what really needs to be done about it rather than all the subterfuge, drama and diversion that pollutes the political and social sphere.
That would also assist us finding our potential to find more unity and some form of common ground as a society because, well, that is what a society is. That abstraction represents the some total of its members and the cohesiveness of their relationships in general.
Yeah, I know, dream on. Each of us can step up to that in our own way and model it, though. Each step in that direction could matter. How else does one not fall for it all or react emotively which is like taking the bait and engaging in a rhetorical trap? When we understand that, we start to gather the conceptual tools to build a framework and we can also dig ourselves, collectively, out of this thickening morass of muck and mire; this widening whirlpool of confusion. We can wake up from the delusions and, knowing that is the start.
I think the future of the country depends on understanding that.
= new reply since forum marked as read
