Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shraga5L

Shraga5L's Journal
Shraga5L's Journal
September 2, 2016

Disguised Eugenics

From Trump's speech - his 10th point:

"Number 10: We will reform legal immigration to serve the best interests of America and its workers

We’ve admitted 59 million immigrants to the United States between 1965 and 2015.

Many of these arrivals have greatly enriched our country. But we now have an obligation to them, and to their children, to control future immigration – as we have following previous immigration waves – to ensure assimilation, integration and upward mobility.

Within just a few years immigration as a share of national population is set to break all historical records.

The time has come for a new immigration commission to develop a new set of reforms to our legal immigration system in order to achieve the following goals:

· To keep immigration levels, measured by population share, within historical norms

· To select immigrants based on their likelihood of success in U.S. society, and their ability to be financially self-sufficient. We need a system that serves our needs – remember, it’s America First.

· To choose immigrants based on merit, skill and proficiency

· And to establish new immigration controls to boost wages and to ensure that open jobs are offered to American workers first.

We want people to come into our country, but they have to come in legally and properly-vetted, and in a manner that serves the national interest.

We’ve been living under outdated immigration rules from decades ago. To avoid this happening in the future, I believe we should sunset our visa laws so that Congress is forced to periodically revise and revisit them. We wouldn’t put our entire federal budget on autopilot for decades, so why should we do the same for immigration?"


That year, 1965, is significant:

[link:http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/08/immigration-1965-law-donald-trump-gop-214179|

September 2, 2016

Trump called for LEGAL immigration quotas in his speech

Gutierrez, with his "taco trucks on every corner" comment, seems to be referring to this same idea... He doesn't want too many brown people in the country (maybe he owns a bunch of taco trucks, and wants to limit competition through legislation - that's very Republican!):

Trump specifically mentioned going back to pre-1965 immigration laws -- another racist "dog whistle", because that would restore the "National Origins Formula" limiting immigration from "non-white" countries.


[link:http://ktar.com/story/1257599/trump-paints-new-target-on-legal-immigration/|

Profile Information

Name: Eric C. Friedman
Gender: Male
Hometown: Great Neck, NY
Home country: USA
Current location: Davenport, IA
Member since: Thu Sep 1, 2016, 09:11 PM
Number of posts: 7

About Shraga5L

I was raised as a member of the "East Coast Jewish Liberal Elite", as some would put it. I recently found out that my dad's first job out of law school was on the ACLU team defending the 1st Amendment rights of Jack Kerouac and William S. Burroughs [he told me that shortly before his death in 2010]. Somehow, I ended up in Iowa, where I caucused for Obama back in 2008. One of my biggest concerns is the Religious Right using "Sharia Law" as a false flag to pass Christian legislation.
Latest Discussions»Shraga5L's Journal