2016 Postmortem

jeff47

(26,549 posts)

49. Ok, let's look at the first page of GDP

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 05:14 PM

Dec 2015

Anti-Clinton
Neutral
Anti-Sanders
Pro-O'Malley
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Sanders
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Sanders
Anti-Clinton-Supporters
Pro-Clinton
"It's not over yet"
Pro-Sanders
Polls Suck
Anti-Sanders
Self-deleted
Anti-Clinton
Anti-Sanders
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Clinton
Pro-Sanders
Polls are awesome
Anti-Sanders-Supporters
Anti-Sanders
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Clinton
Anti-Both
Anti-Clinton
Pro-Clinton
Polls are sorta awesome and sorta not awesome
Anti-Sanders
Pro-Sanders
Polls are awesome
Anti-Clinton
Polls are awesome
Anti-Sanders-Supporters
Pro-Sanders
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Sanders
Pro-Clinton/Anti-Sanders
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Sanders
Anti-Sanders
Pro-Clinton
Pro-Clinton
Polls are awesome
Pro-Sanders
Pro-Clinton
Anti-Clinton-Supporter (specific)
Anti-Clinton
Anti-Sanders
Anti-Sanders
Neutral
Pro-Clinton
Anti-Clinton-Supporter (specific)
Anti-Sanders
Anti-Clinton-Supporters
Pro-Sanders
Polls suck
Polls are awesome
Polls are awesome
Pro-Sanders
Shut up and vote for Clinton
Pro-Sanders
Polls are awesome
Pro-Sanders
Pro-MSNBC
Pro-Clinton
Anti-Sanders
Anti-DLC
Pro-Clinton
Pro-Sanders
Pro-Clinton/Suck on this Sanders supporters!
Hidden by Jury
Pro-Sanders
Anti-Clinton
Anti-Clinton
Pro-Clinton
All Democrats are better than Republicans

17.9% Anti-Clinton or Anti-Clinton-Supporter
24.4% Anti-Sanders or Anti-Sanders-Supporter

Now, tell me again how DU is all anti-HRC, all the time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

139 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here is what I dont understand. And I really want to. [View all] randys1 Dec 2015 OP

Meh, they're just venting. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #1

Funny how you ignore the dozens of ops trashing Bernie. cali Dec 2015 #2

That's right! They did it first! Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #12

He acknowledged that some come from "the other side". George II Dec 2015 #72

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #3

A fair minded post, I will attempt a reply GusBob Dec 2015 #4

It's funny how I never see these dozens of threads Kalidurga Dec 2015 #5

You're making the mistake of thinking our votes count. jeff47 Dec 2015 #6

Not even states. Electing a President falls to a relatively small number of purple counties. merrily Dec 2015 #32

Hillary supporters are 15% of this site but post 65% of the threads Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #7

That is just not accurate. A quick look at latest threads proves it, too. nt MADem Dec 2015 #9

What's the correct numbers? I'll correct my figures. Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #11

You made the claim--you do the homework. MADem Dec 2015 #14

I did a quick count one time. Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #17

You need to check again. DU is all anti-HRC, all the time. MADem Dec 2015 #20

Why would leave? There's no rule against criticizing Democratic candidates. n/t Dawgs Dec 2015 #21

You might want to read the TOS. nt MADem Dec 2015 #24

I did and says nothing about criticizing Democratic candidates. n/t Dawgs Dec 2015 #25

Look again. nt MADem Dec 2015 #29

Well, I've been here since 2004 and I've never been banned, repremanded, etc. for criticizing Dems. Dawgs Dec 2015 #38

Obviously you do it in a respectful fashion (unless you've been lucky). MADem Dec 2015 #46

So your intention if it is Cruz or Trump vs Hillary, is to continue to criticize Hillary? randys1 Dec 2015 #57

Yep. Doesn't matter what you want to call it. n/t Dawgs Dec 2015 #58

Then what draws you to a board for liberals and democrats? randys1 Dec 2015 #70

No. Really. Any one of us can criticize Democratic candidates. Any and all of them. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #88

And some of us do NOTHING but.... nt MADem Dec 2015 #105

Ok, let's look at the first page of GDP jeff47 Dec 2015 #49

Let me be the first to applaud the time you put into this. Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #53

Hahahaha! You're gonna hear crickets, of course. beerandjesus Dec 2015 #54

Anti Sanders Andy823 Dec 2015 #61

How DARE the peons want a party to represent them! jeff47 Dec 2015 #62

I wasn't talking about peons Andy823 Dec 2015 #110

Yes, you were talking about peons. jeff47 Dec 2015 #134

+ a lot. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #71

Thank you, jeff47. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #63

I am going to trust YOUR characterizations? Naaah. Let''s bold all the pro-Bern/Anti-Clinton posts MADem Dec 2015 #83

So pro-Sanders is the same as anti-Clinton now? But pro-O'Malley is not anti-Clinton? jeff47 Dec 2015 #89

Absolutely--I've found that many pro-Sanders posts can't resist putting a dig in against his MADem Dec 2015 #93

So apparently, we'll have to go through your list line by line, because this one: beerandjesus Dec 2015 #91

Go on--do it!!! It'll keep you busy. MADem Dec 2015 #96

That is exactly what happened madokie Dec 2015 #139

A quick count, one time.... msrizzo Dec 2015 #82

He made the claim, you called him on it. it's up to you to show us why his claim is wrong. Ed Suspicious Dec 2015 #43

You, too, can pull up the Latest Threads list and do a count, yourself. MADem Dec 2015 #48

I trust his count until you can show me otherwise. Ed Suspicious Dec 2015 #52

Hey, I'm looking forward to your response to this: beerandjesus Dec 2015 #55

Oh, I'll just bet you ARE, you helpful sort, you! MADem Dec 2015 #85

I did a quick tally. From midnight to about 2pm (local time). Bubzer Dec 2015 #78

The original claim wasn't supported mythology Dec 2015 #98

A statistic based on nothing... Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #13

I counted one time Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #18

Where do I fall -- Sanders or Clinton? Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #23

Sixty five percent of statistics are made up on the spot. nt. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #22

Dupe. nt Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #26

We agree. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #30

I did my best. I'm not a scientist Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #31

Show your work. Basic concept. Lets see. nt. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #33

Well I assume Andy823 Dec 2015 #60

How many are paid to post? tecelote Dec 2015 #79

Baloney Hekate Dec 2015 #108

I can't really speak for anybody else but I can think of a few reasons el_bryanto Dec 2015 #8

Pretty much sums it up Armstead Dec 2015 #16

Nice. Thanks. erronis Dec 2015 #47

Bingo. NRaleighLiberal Dec 2015 #68

I don't get it either . . . fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #10

"Bashing" and "hating" seem to be the terms some use to describe bringing up Hillary's record or merrily Dec 2015 #34

Agreed Rebkeh Dec 2015 #132

She is the choice of the party bigwigs for President (this time, not in 2008). merrily Dec 2015 #133

Then you're not listening. ibegurpard Dec 2015 #15

It makes no sense assuming we're all dems gwheezie Dec 2015 #19

I think what is really difficult to understand.... NCTraveler Dec 2015 #27

Great, another post complaining about Bernie supporters. Just one of many. Broward Dec 2015 #28

The OP has always maintained that he is not only a Bernie supporter but is involved in Bernie's merrily Dec 2015 #37

Strange, I've noticed carping about Bernie supporters from this poster in other threads as well. Broward Dec 2015 #40

A LOT. Not about Hillary's supporters, though. Lots of defense of Hillary, too. merrily Dec 2015 #42

The OP has always seemed to me to be a Hillary supporter. Blus4u Dec 2015 #59

It reminds me of artislife Dec 2015 #64

No words... randys1 Dec 2015 #66

You can't possibly be surprised. merrily Dec 2015 #73

Oh I am not. I do wonder where some of you were 4 years ago, 8 yrs ago, 20 yrs ago. randys1 Dec 2015 #86

None of which has a thing to do it. merrily Dec 2015 #92

Has everything to do with it. You see I am not just a Bernie supporter, but LIKE Bernie, randys1 Dec 2015 #95

It doesn't have a thing to do with my Reply 42. I didn't say you should criticize Hillary. merrily Dec 2015 #99

The one where you alleged I wasnt a Bernie supporter? Yeah, it has everything to do with it randys1 Dec 2015 #100

Nope, nothing to do with it. I never have never suggested anyone is not a Bernie merrily Dec 2015 #103

OMG OMG then what in the HELL does this mean? randys1 Dec 2015 #106

Now, if you had quoted me saying he can't be a Bernie supporter because he doesn't criticize Hillary merrily Dec 2015 #107

No doubt, the best response to that sort of mess and those who propagate it... Number23 Dec 2015 #76

And when I do type words, I risk banishment. For that I truly have no fucking words randys1 Dec 2015 #87

Then you'll join a long, LONG line of intelligent, honest, nice people who don't sit Number23 Dec 2015 #90

(I said something shitty here) beerandjesus Dec 2015 #56

No words... randys1 Dec 2015 #67

Are you really surprised? beerandjesus Dec 2015 #94

That's just BS. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #69

I don't know randys1... beerandjesus Dec 2015 #97

Look on the bright side... Spirochete Dec 2015 #84

It is far far worse this time around cosmicone Dec 2015 #35

It happens every time we have a primary Gore1FL Dec 2015 #36

Maybe the constant dripping drone of expecting Bernie's supporters to (oddly) believe that djean111 Dec 2015 #39

She's already depressing enthusiasm ibegurpard Dec 2015 #51

They may be looking beyond 2016 Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #41

You mention gerrymandering, but as someone who was working night and day about truedelphi Dec 2015 #126

The same may be true about those now supporting Hillary. Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #128

Your point about the gerrymandering is good. wildeyed Dec 2015 #136

Holding the White House for 4 consecutive terms isn't easy. Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #138

sorry, only one of the candidates is running a campaign based on Rovian tactics MisterP Dec 2015 #44

That's why I am not piling on. Don't want her for POTUS but she's most certainly our nominee. KittyWampus Dec 2015 #45

Because it's fashionable. betsuni Dec 2015 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author Rebkeh Dec 2015 #65

Many are sick of the status quo. TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #74

Why would they do anything different now? They get hundreds of recs for doing it Number23 Dec 2015 #75

Defeating Hillary is vital for the health of the Democratic Party. Maedhros Dec 2015 #77

For many, that vow apparently applies even after she's nominated. Strange. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #81

Those people were banned out right d_legendary1 Dec 2015 #101

+1 ret5hd Dec 2015 #102

I sure don't either n/t doc03 Dec 2015 #80

Hillary gets criticized on her actual positions and statements Scootaloo Dec 2015 #104

So rightwing sources are never used, rightwing memes. sigh randys1 Dec 2015 #109

Like Stormfront? Progressives Today? Gateway Pundit? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #116

... randys1 Dec 2015 #117

Astute rebuttal. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #124

Funny, if you hadn't stated you support Bernie, I would not have known. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #111

Great point, yes you wouldn't have known because i spend ZERO time BASHING either candidate randys1 Dec 2015 #112

No, it's because your behavior is compatible with the decidedly anti-Bernie/pro-Hillary people here. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #113

My behaviour is to ONLY prevent the terrorist teaparty from taking the WH randys1 Dec 2015 #114

I suggest you start working on Bernie's behalf then because Hillary can't win the GE. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #118

A. I have never said he cant win...B. Of course Hillary can win, the ONLY other place I see that randys1 Dec 2015 #120

Polling says she can't win the GE. The same polling Hillary fans flog here daily. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #121

more specifically ibegurpard Dec 2015 #123

Yes indeed. That is an important factor as well. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #127

I'm in. wildeyed Dec 2015 #125

Yeah, I hear what you are saying. wildeyed Dec 2015 #115

My son has been on me for years to watch "The Wire", not yet. randys1 Dec 2015 #119

I get what their point is too. wildeyed Dec 2015 #130

I think posts on a message board, good and bad, have little effect bigwillq Dec 2015 #122

Yep. wildeyed Dec 2015 #135

If she wins the nomination the nation is harmed whether or not she wins the election. bowens43 Dec 2015 #129

wow... randys1 Dec 2015 #131

Who wins when she is harmed? Hepburn Dec 2015 #137