2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Clinton ‘often confused’ says staffer in email. [View all]onenote
(42,831 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 17, 2015, 05:53 PM - Edit history (1)
across the front page.
The degree to which the story is "interesting" varies enormously if one omits the factual context. And generally speaking, before I post anything, I try to verify it and understand its context, especially when I see triggers such as "Judicial Watch" who have a distinct agenda.
Yes, facts are facts. But when relevant facts are omitted, facts become misleading.
And I'm having trouble buying the notion that it's just a coincidence that the poster that linked to this story just happens to be the same poster that linked to a rw website (redstate) article that described Clinton as "an old lady with a brain injury." http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027181586