Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,162 posts)
17. It actually works the opposite from what you are thinking
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:15 AM
Jan 2013

It is the Democratic districts which are hugely Democratic while the GOP ones are more like 55/45 districts. NC was a perfect example of this. In NC we have 13 Congressional districts.

Democratic districts District 1 (majority minority) Dem incumbent 75% GOP challenger 23%. District 4 Dem incumbent 74% GOP challenger 25%. District 12 (majority minority) Dem incumbent 80% GOP challenger 20%

GOP districts District 2 GOP incumbent 56% Dem Challenger 41%, District 3 GOP incumbent 63% Dem challenger 37%, District 5 GOP incumbent 58 % Dem challenger 42%, District 6 GOP incumbent 61% Dem challenger 39%, District 8 GOP challenger 53% Dem incumbent 45%, District 9 open seat GOP 52% Dem 46%, District 10 GOP incumbent 57% Dem challenger 43%, District 11 open seat GOP 57% Dem 43%, District 13 open seat GOP 57% Dem 43%

Tie district (won by Democrat) District 7
District 50.1% to 49.9% this seat was drawn to be a GOP district (Romney won 57 to 43) but our very conservative Democratic candidate won by 654 votes out of 336,736 votes cast.

In the state as a whole, Democrats got more votes for Congress than did the GOP did but nearly lost 10 seats out of 13.

The Dem districts with the exception of district 7 are overwhelmingly Democratic (D 52, D 49, D 60)while the GOP districts range from a 6 point GOP edge to a 22 point GOP edge. So it is kind of the opposite of what your OP suggests.

If a district is 70% registered Republican no Democrat is going to win. former9thward Jan 2013 #1
And what % is unregistered altogether? annabanana Jan 2013 #2
here Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #3
Pretty damn weird map for sure. annabanana Jan 2013 #4
Not quite sure what you're after, Anna, but... Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #6
You cannot tell when you cross the boundaries. blue neen Jan 2013 #16
Unfortunately No Vested Interest Jan 2013 #13
The map at the Wikipedia link is old, but not the atlas map. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #14
Hi Buzz, blue neen Jan 2013 #15
Help poor Anna out. jerseyjack Jan 2013 #5
Oh I got GREAT face palms... annabanana Jan 2013 #7
Here's racial gerrymandering for you. Redfairen Jan 2013 #8
An ugly piece of business to be sure. annabanana Jan 2013 #9
The 6th district is a direct result of the Voting Rights Act. former9thward Jan 2013 #10
Thank you. annabanana Jan 2013 #11
That is screwed up davidpdx Jan 2013 #18
Michelle Blackburn's district: Lars39 Jan 2013 #12
It's Marsha Blackburn tnlurker Jan 2013 #28
Argh! I know better...musta been tired. Lars39 Jan 2013 #29
It is still bad tnlurker Jan 2013 #32
It actually works the opposite from what you are thinking dsc Jan 2013 #17
Yes, +1. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #19
This makes it seem not so hopeless.. annabanana Jan 2013 #21
It is pretty bad dsc Jan 2013 #23
The point is not a "deeply red" district Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #20
So the red is actually annabanana Jan 2013 #22
No - here in NC some of the red districts are very gerrymandered. blm Jan 2013 #26
I applaud all of you. You know this stuff -- an education for sure. This funky drawing up of Filibuster Harry Jan 2013 #24
Here is a place to see demographics on a district csziggy Jan 2013 #25
Actually, Gerrymandering results in less deep-red districts. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #27
Thank you Jackpine annabanana Jan 2013 #31
That's certainly correct. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #33
Here's Michele "batshit crazy" Bachmann's district: Zoeisright Jan 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can someone draw me a pic...»Reply #17