2016 Postmortem

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)

8. I think Clinton has nothing to do with it!

Sun Apr 24, 2016, 06:55 PM

Apr 2016

Let me make this clear: Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with what De Blasio is allegedly accused of, nor was she involved in any illegal campaign activities nor has she ever done so.

I am not accusing Clinton, the DNC, DWS or any other person that is involved with the Hillary campaign of anything.

People ask why Sanders does not unilaterally donate to down ticket Democrats, I posted this to show why he doesn't. Mayor DE Blasio And not Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is innocent in this allegedly funneled money illegally to upstate Democratic candidates. Sanders does not want money used in such an allegedly illegal and immoral manner.

Does that help, or can you spin it in some manner that I am attacking Hillary Clinton?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, is this what Hillary means when she refers to supporting the down ticket? [View all] Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 OP

IMO all of the bullshit about Hillary supporting the down-ticket but Bernie is not - is, well, djean111 Apr 2016 #1

Bingo nt Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #2

I read the article, but there's no mention of Clinton anywhere. procon Apr 2016 #4

What? Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #6

In your mad zeal to blame Clinton for something, procon Apr 2016 #7

I think Clinton has nothing to do with it! Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #5

What the fuck does this have to do with Hillary dlwickham Apr 2016 #9

The has nothing to do with Hillary Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #10

What utter bullshit dlwickham Apr 2016 #11

In every speech against money in politics. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #12

He said that he won't raise money for down ticket candidates dlwickham Apr 2016 #13

Yes, because he is against the corruption it brings... Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #14

You Gwhittey Apr 2016 #15

I will never accuse someone Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #18

I will. When they seem to lack any logic/intelligence I'll let 'em know what I think. snowy owl Apr 2016 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author Gwhittey Apr 2016 #35

Jury results. merrily Apr 2016 #33

So you're saying Sanders can't figure out which candidates are worth supporting? brooklynite Apr 2016 #16

Really? Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #17

"I was just giving one reason why Sanders doesn't unilaterally give his donation money down ticket" brooklynite Apr 2016 #19

Sanders only gives to those candidates he has vetted. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #20

A grand total of three: brooklynite Apr 2016 #21

This is about the violation of election finance laws. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #26

Why should he decide for me or anybody else. Typical HRC response. HRC do your thinking for you? snowy owl Apr 2016 #28

Then change the title of your thread. emulatorloo Apr 2016 #29

The title is apt. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #36

No, the DeBlasio issue has nothing to do with HRC as you yourself have said. emulatorloo Apr 2016 #37

Let me say this again. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #38

Okay n/t emulatorloo Apr 2016 #39

If I were a Hillary supporter, I'd be more concerned with the finances of the Clinton Foundation merrily Apr 2016 #34

Straw man. eom fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #40

Congrats You just proved you have no idea what "straw man" means. But fret not. merrily Apr 2016 #42

ad hominem eom fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #43

As others have pointed out to you, the DeBlasio issue has nothing to do with Hillary. You even stevenleser Apr 2016 #22

Okay. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #23

Okay. stevenleser Apr 2016 #24

I know, sorry. Please see my ETA. Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #27

It is typical of establishment politics. The status quo. Politics as usual. Your choice not mine. snowy owl Apr 2016 #30

Nope. It is a red herring that has nothing to do with Hillary. Your choice to use logical fallacies. stevenleser Apr 2016 #31

It's completely legitimate loyalsister Apr 2016 #32

Where is the story link that rawsorry is attributing to the 'Times.' eom fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #41