Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

speedoo

(11,229 posts)

4. I think that article is worthless.

Reply to courseofhistory (Original post)

Thu Oct 18, 2012, 12:24 PM

Oct 2012

Calling a 2 electoral vote lead insurmountable is idiotic.

For one thing, it's 270towin, not 273.

And I believe another article from that site was recently posted, that was also worthless.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Latest Presidential Polls: Obama Holds insurmountable Lead in the Electoral College [View all] courseofhistory Oct 2012 OP

Nothing is "insurmountable" if we don't GOTV... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #1

i agree mgcgulfcoast Oct 2012 #7

The Romney clan has investments in vote machines it's got to be criminal bkkyosemite Oct 2012 #2

"The Romney clan has investments in vote machines" TroyD Oct 2012 #6

It's An O K Assessment Of The State Of The Race DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #3

I think that article is worthless. speedoo Oct 2012 #4

273towin? n/t bamacrat Oct 2012 #5