Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mostlyconfused

(211 posts)
9. That was 1984
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:41 AM
Dec 2012

When Reagan made that speech the annual social security taxes collected were exceeding the amount of outlays, and any excess tax collected was going into the trust fund. I take that to mean is was self contained, and not impacting the federal budget.

Today the outlays significantly exceed the tax revenues, and according to the 2011 Social Security trustees report the program was funded that year (or maybe it was 2010) from...

> "$564 billion in net contributions, $24 billion from taxation of benefits, $114 billion in interest, and $103 billion in reimbursements from the General Fund of the Treasury"

That suggests that it does impact the budget today, where it perhaps didn't in 1984. As much fun as it is to throw Reagan back into their faces, I'm not sure how relevant this clip is to today's debate.

tell that to Blue Dogs... and I thought Reagan was their hero fascisthunter Dec 2012 #1
Teabaggers? Comments? ........................................................ Ididn't think so. AAO Dec 2012 #2
Interesting Bainbridge Bear Dec 2012 #3
Alan Simpson? Why Syzygy Dec 2012 #13
Not sure he used that exact term, but the asswipe sure as hell meant it. Faygo Kid Dec 2012 #22
Never EVER thought I'd see the day I'd thank that total piece of shit Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #4
and cheney said deficits don't matter Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #5
Oh, no... they want more than THAT! MrMickeysMom Dec 2012 #6
I've been looking for this clip thanks for posting sasha031 Dec 2012 #7
Send this to all of Congress liberal N proud Dec 2012 #8
That was 1984 mostlyconfused Dec 2012 #9
It doesn't... Why Syzygy Dec 2012 #12
The fund needs paid back from all the borrowing! livingonearth Dec 2012 #16
Yes, you are mostly confused. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #23
AAARRRGHHH! Phlem Dec 2012 #10
zowie.. says it all . nt/shared Why Syzygy Dec 2012 #11
Why can't Obama say this? Over and over and over and over? grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #14
Because he championed the payroll tax cut that made SS part of the budget deficit. n//t PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #15
That payroll tax cut made me mad. livingonearth Dec 2012 #17
+1 grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #26
The borrowing started Why Syzygy Dec 2012 #24
Our President IS a Regan Democrat but cannot repeat these bonniebgood Dec 2012 #18
Umm obama2terms Dec 2012 #20
yes, yes it will fascisthunter Dec 2012 #21
who is "Regan"? NoMoreWarNow Dec 2012 #25
Hmmm obama2terms Dec 2012 #19
Kudos...good going! Welcome to Du. Glad you're here. snappyturtle Dec 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Reagan: "Social Secu...»Reply #9