Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Chicago's Cook County drops bullet tax, keeps gun levy [View all]hack89
(39,171 posts)77. He doesn't have the more important support - votes in Congress.
there will not be an AWB. If that party plank makes you feel better well then fine. But that is all you will get on the matter.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The 24th Amendment (1964) applied only to federal elections. The OP case is for state rights.
jody
Oct 2012
#10
I never see you put up this much fuss about children going hungry or without health care
CreekDog
Nov 2012
#40
Ineffective, tax gun grabbers and use the money to purchase guns for law-abiding citizens who are at
jody
Oct 2012
#7
How hypocritical. If Preckwinkle really thought guns were a source of violence, he would be working
slackmaster
Oct 2012
#8
I'm not scared of government at all. I'm simply pointing out that people who SAY they want all...
slackmaster
Oct 2012
#19
She's not taking very good care of her poor constituents who want to buy firearms
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#37
Obama winning inspite of the GOP Saying He Is Going To Take Your Gun
fightthegoodfightnow
Nov 2012
#51
Hack89 thinks the President is Not Honest When He Said in the second debate
fightthegoodfightnow
Nov 2012
#69
Which is why the AWB is constantly mentioned by the President in the campaign ... oh wait.
hack89
Nov 2012
#38
Nuisance taxes and Sin taxes have been with us for a couple of centuries and have not
byeya
Nov 2012
#35
It's applied uniformly. The federal government does have the power to regulate interstate commerce.
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#59