Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
5. Because there is pretty much no way to catch real attackers in the planning stage.
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 04:51 PM
Oct 2012

And these agencies need to justify their existence with "results" lest they lose their jobs.

It happened to air marshals pre-9/11. There were a number hired as a response to the hijackings of the 70s, then congress drastically cut their numbers during the Reagan era with the main argument being that they were making so few arrests. Then 9/11 happened and there was no air marshall to stop a handful of men with box cutters on any of those planes. Immediately afterwards, the government increased their numbers many thousand-fold. But a give it couple decades without significant arrests and you can bet they'll get cut again.

I guess the FBI has been around long enough to know the game and how to avoid the same fate.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Suspected Terrorist Arres...»Reply #5