Latest Breaking News

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)

6. AG Holder is under no obligation to turn them over, and Rep. Issa is out-of-line demanding them.

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 03:41 AM

Jun 2012

He's jeopardizing future DoJ operations for the sake of scoring political points in an election year.

Also, I'd like to remind everyone that Rep. Darrell Issa stole (Recursion's) fucking hot dog. Literally, not figuratively. His fucking hot dog. Right off the table. And Part II.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rep. Darrell Issa willing to postpone House contempt vote against AG Eric Holder [View all] steve2470 Jun 2012 OP

"Willing to postpone?" Does that mean he doesn't have his team "in line?" nt MADem Jun 2012 #1

It means Karl Rove called Issa. sofa king Jun 2012 #8

must-see vid on the issues on Ed Show here - role of guns, assault weapons is major issue wordpix Jun 2012 #29

I like your explanation. I hope you are right... CTyankee Jun 2012 #31

Correct me if I am wrong but the documents Eric Holder is not turning over are documents SoutherDem Jun 2012 #2

+ 1. A Republican wet dream, to be blunt. Applaud Holder. Hoyt Jun 2012 #3

here's a Fri. hardball interview on this wordpix Jun 2012 #28

Let's have a national contempt vote for Issa. n/t EFerrari Jun 2012 #4

"additional records as promised" - Issa BS. Bolo Boffin Jun 2012 #5

AG Holder is under no obligation to turn them over, and Rep. Issa is out-of-line demanding them. DRoseDARs Jun 2012 #6

Postpone = "Do him to shoot you now or wait 'til you get home?" no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #7

Tsk, Issa blinked. nt bemildred Jun 2012 #9

Isn't the DoJ tooo busy looking into car thieves and frisking Congress critters for illegal Uzzis? L. Coyote Jun 2012 #10

Ban guns and the NRA(aka the extremists)and put Holder on the Supreme Court graham4anything Jun 2012 #11

Yes, by all means. And as soon as we have all their guns, banning speech, religion and 24601 Jun 2012 #13

One cannot yell fire in a theater graham4anything Jun 2012 #15

All rights exist by default under our lystem slackmaster Jun 2012 #16

without rules you have anarchy graham4anything Jun 2012 #17

Who do you believe is suggesting there should be NO rules? slackmaster Jun 2012 #18

Would you believe... graham4anything Jun 2012 #22

Of course you can yell fire in a theater - Iv'e been in one when it was yelled. If you falsely 24601 Jun 2012 #19

No doubt you really meant to say "they" should ban ALL guns... slackmaster Jun 2012 #14

NRA behind this issue b/c REAL prob is flood of thousands of illegal guns across border wordpix Jun 2012 #30

Issa must be realizing that the program did not start under the Obama administration. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #12

Vietnam didn't have to start under Johnson to drive him from running again. It's not what 24601 Jun 2012 #20

but it took a gun(or two) to kill RFK, JFK, MLK, etc. graham4anything Jun 2012 #21

Specifically three - two rifles and one pistol. But Teddy would have needed to be driving a VW. 24601 Jun 2012 #25

bad analogy b/c there was no cover up here! Holder stopped FnF as soon as he learned about it wordpix Jun 2012 #27

Why doesn't he just postpone it until after the election? eringer Jun 2012 #23

I wouldn't want to miss this opportunity to say vanlassie Jun 2012 #24

Issa's own ATF witness testifying said lax US gun laws are mostly to blame for the deaths wordpix Jun 2012 #26

I wish he would go ahead. This would be a turning point for many folks on the fence. nanabugg Jun 2012 #32