General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PRESS RELEASE: Racketeering Romney Lawsuit Becomes Official November 6th [View all]laserhaas
(7,805 posts)GENIUS move on your part!
WOW - you point out the fact that I'm not a good writer as a pro se - party;
again how great a GENIUS you must feel like and be.
WOW - you have to go WAY BACK from 2013 and completely DODGE the Update above ^^^^
that gave you not just One (as you double dogged dared);
but a plethora of valid points.
All of which is moot to a person such as you with a veiled agenda.
[br][hr][br]
What you are doing for me - (and whom ever you are working with digging up your bologna);
is encouraging me (and all readers here) on how strong the evidences are.
You simply CAN"T dare (double dog dare) - address the fact that this case is about attorneys at law who SOLD OUT their Court APPROVED clients for the sake of their (secret clients) friends Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital.
Because, once you do that - you validate the legitimacy of this entire case.
As there is NO GREATER SIN for an attorney at law;
Than that of Betrayal of a Client's trust/case.
Attorney's at Law oath to the BAR, the courts and clients;
is that LOYALTY to the approved client
is SACROSANCT!
[br]
[hr][br]
I've relented on my stance that I would not speak with you;
because it did appear (for a second or two) that you had "some" good faith intent.
Now that you have revealed your colors - we are completely DONE;
until you capitulate to the paramount issues of lying under oath and duty of client loyalty!
WHEREAS if you can't address those facts (already in evidence Confessed);
you have NO good faith intent!
And are a waste of everyone's time!