Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Chief Judge of Secret FISA Court Admits In Written Statement That It Cannot Properly Oversee NSA [View all]
It has been no secret that the FISA court has effectively operated as a rubber-stamping outfit for NSA surveillance programs. However, when the chief judge on that court, embarrassed by reports of NSA violations, admits that it really isn't intended to be an oversight entity?
Court: Ability to police U.S. spying program limited
The chief judge of the secret FISA court, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, has admitted in a written statement to The Washington Post that the court cannot properly oversee NSA surveillance.
Per The Washington Post:
The leader of the secret court that is supposed to provide critical oversight of the governments vast spying programs said that its ability do so is limited and that it must trust the government to report when it improperly spies on Americans.
The chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court said the court lacks the tools to independently verify how often the governments surveillance breaks the court's rules that aim to protect Americans privacy. Without taking drastic steps, it also cannot check the veracity of the governments assertions that the violations its staff members report are unintentional mistakes.
The chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court said the court lacks the tools to independently verify how often the governments surveillance breaks the court's rules that aim to protect Americans privacy. Without taking drastic steps, it also cannot check the veracity of the governments assertions that the violations its staff members report are unintentional mistakes.
Said Walton:
The FISC is forced to rely upon the accuracy of the information that is provided to the Court...The FISC does not have the capacity to investigate issues of noncompliance.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/court-ability-to-police-us-spying-program-limited/2013/08/15/4a8c8c44-05cd-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/08/15/1231553/-Chief-Judge-of-Secret-FISA-Court-Admits-It-Cannot-Properly-Oversee-NSA
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
40 replies, 3400 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (57)
ReplyReply to this post
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Chief Judge of Secret FISA Court Admits In Written Statement That It Cannot Properly Oversee NSA [View all]
kpete
Aug 2013
OP
I want judicial oversight of the three-letter-agencies moved to the mainline federal courts.
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#3
Jeez thanks Judge. It would have been nice if these judges had like, done their job.
limpyhobbler
Aug 2013
#4
Hell, they could have been charged themselves, had they said too much that was not public.
X_Digger
Aug 2013
#22
There goes another of the excuses as to why all this is just fine. 'We have the FISA Court that
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#13
"In the end when the 'secrets' are revealed, we find out why they had to be so secret and usually
Th1onein
Aug 2013
#26
He's a hack Bush appointee but he did write something telling regarding the Guantanamo cases.
rug
Aug 2013
#14
No, if I understand correctly… isn't this judge commenting on what happens AFTER warrants are given?
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#21
Why would FISA court provide the oversight that CONGRESS should be doing? Hello?
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#19
Because the law requires FISC judicial oversight: 50 USC § 1803(h) and FISC rules of procedure 13a
Melinda
Aug 2013
#25