Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 10:21 PM Aug 2013

The Chief Judge of Secret FISA Court Admits In Written Statement That It Cannot Properly Oversee NSA [View all]

It has been no secret that the FISA court has effectively operated as a rubber-stamping outfit for NSA surveillance programs. However, when the chief judge on that court, embarrassed by reports of NSA violations, admits that it really isn't intended to be an oversight entity?



Court: Ability to police U.S. spying program limited

The chief judge of the secret FISA court, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, has admitted in a written statement to The Washington Post that the court cannot properly oversee NSA surveillance.

Per The Washington Post:

The leader of the secret court that is supposed to provide critical oversight of the government’s vast spying programs said that its ability do so is limited and that it must trust the government to report when it improperly spies on Americans.

The chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court said the court lacks the tools to independently verify how often the government’s surveillance breaks the court's rules that aim to protect Americans’ privacy. Without taking drastic steps, it also cannot check the veracity of the government’s assertions that the violations its staff members report are unintentional mistakes.


Said Walton:

The FISC is forced to rely upon the accuracy of the information that is provided to the Court...The FISC does not have the capacity to investigate issues of noncompliance.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/court-ability-to-police-us-spying-program-limited/2013/08/15/4a8c8c44-05cd-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/08/15/1231553/-Chief-Judge-of-Secret-FISA-Court-Admits-It-Cannot-Properly-Oversee-NSA
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The facade is falling, and falling fast... methinks nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #1
So, NO oversight. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #2
All of Obama's assertions are falling apart. dkf Aug 2013 #11
it sucks. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #12
Me too!!! Gave money, canvassed... dkf Aug 2013 #15
I want judicial oversight of the three-letter-agencies moved to the mainline federal courts. backscatter712 Aug 2013 #3
Jeez thanks Judge. It would have been nice if these judges had like, done their job. limpyhobbler Aug 2013 #4
Nobody would have known what he was talking about if not for SNOWDEN. dkf Aug 2013 #10
And that's ^^the truth^^. "Courage is contagious". n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #17
None of us would have known how massive it was, either...if not for Snowden. KoKo Aug 2013 #38
Hell, they could have been charged themselves, had they said too much that was not public. X_Digger Aug 2013 #22
Then he would have had to flee to Russia. caseymoz Aug 2013 #29
what are the "drastic steps"? nt grasswire Aug 2013 #5
great ? kpete Aug 2013 #8
It seems that nobody wants to take ownership of this runaway train. Baitball Blogger Aug 2013 #6
Regarding the Constitution, "trust us" is not acceptable. neverforget Aug 2013 #7
Boom...game, set, and match. dkf Aug 2013 #9
There goes another of the excuses as to why all this is just fine. 'We have the FISA Court that sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #13
"In the end when the 'secrets' are revealed, we find out why they had to be so secret and usually Th1onein Aug 2013 #26
He's a hack Bush appointee but he did write something telling regarding the Guantanamo cases. rug Aug 2013 #14
This is where ProSense Aug 2013 #16
You know this means Jack if the Republicans aren't on board with it AZ Progressive Aug 2013 #18
OK, so what are you expecting to happen, ProSense Aug 2013 #20
No, if I understand correctly… isn't this judge commenting on what happens AFTER warrants are given? KittyWampus Aug 2013 #21
Why would FISA court provide the oversight that CONGRESS should be doing? Hello? KittyWampus Aug 2013 #19
Because the law requires FISC judicial oversight: 50 USC § 1803(h) and FISC rules of procedure 13a Melinda Aug 2013 #25
........ ohheckyeah Aug 2013 #28
I believe it's been revealed caseymoz Aug 2013 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author nenagh Aug 2013 #32
Who watches the watchers? quakerboy Aug 2013 #23
Surprise! Surprise? Surprise. n/t DirkGently Aug 2013 #24
What a ohheckyeah Aug 2013 #27
ROFLMFAO: "it must trust the government to report when it improperly spies on Americans" Coyotl Aug 2013 #30
Bottom line: the NSA has no oversight. Waiting For Everyman Aug 2013 #33
pretty much kpete Aug 2013 #35
^ Wilms Aug 2013 #34
But Booz Allen Hamilton would never cover anything up, surely? muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #36
Anyway, who's going to listen to a Black Helicopter Judge? (nt) muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #37
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #39
K&R woo me with science Aug 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Chief Judge of Secret...