General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)

10. On the scene?

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 10:04 PM

Feb 2013

He was listening to radio broadcasts. Maybe he heard clearly, maybe he didn't. Maybe the people he heard knew what was going on, maybe they didn't.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Law Enforcement and Media Covered Up the Plan to Burn Christopher Dorner Alive [View all] Gentle-man Feb 2013 OP

Waco 2013 JaneyVee Feb 2013 #1

Symbionese Liberation Army killed by burning by the LAPD in 1974. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #40

Burner = hot tear gas canister.... Historic NY Feb 2013 #2

Then why did they impede the fire department from quenching the fire? Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #16

They won't let them come up until they're sure Light House Feb 2013 #23

And by "safe", you mean a dead suspect? Because a live suspect wouldn't be safe. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #25

Not necessarily dead, Light House Feb 2013 #26

Please remember that PD had been shooting to kill from the very beginning. 64 bullets unloaded Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #29

But remember, Light House Feb 2013 #31

Yeah, let's wait for the "official" investigation, because that's ALWAYS the truth, right? Th1onein Feb 2013 #57

Because he had lots of ammunition. Fire + ammunition = bad. DevonRex Feb 2013 #33

Because fire fighters don't wear bullet proof vests. dkf Feb 2013 #58

Yeah ok, at an active shooter situation... Historic NY Feb 2013 #60

10-4 heaven05 Feb 2013 #36

I doubt they meant tear gas when they said burner. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #45

The article says that it is THERMITE -- an INCENDIARY DEVICE Th1onein Feb 2013 #55

Meanwhile the Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #3

False. And you are smart enough to know that. dbackjon Feb 2013 #4

I didn't have the scanner channel up during the execution, but I did see several Twitter Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #12

What's the purpose behind your post? What's the point? nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #5

Linking a story from a reputable source and reporter. Cooley Hurd Feb 2013 #7

You dont find it significant that a person on the scene wrote wqhat he saw, and that is what he saw? robinlynne Feb 2013 #8

On the scene? brooklynite Feb 2013 #10

He was listening to radios on the scene, with the police. robinlynne Feb 2013 #49

I find it more significant that there has been a ton of stuff reported on this story.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #44

As several posters pointed out, Dorner had no LAPD badge. robinlynne Feb 2013 #50

And they know this how, exactly? Did they read it on the Internet? nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #52

Dorner was fired in 2009. robinlynne Feb 2013 #53

seems obvious heaven05 Feb 2013 #38

See my post #44. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #48

I guess it is a sigh of the times that you ask that question. zeemike Feb 2013 #46

Wow. Read my post #44. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #51

Link to this exchange/audio here... jmg257 Feb 2013 #6

Man says there is corruption in LAPD. sheriffs burn him alive and attempt to cover it up. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #9

You do know that the term "burner" refers to a type of tear gas, don't you? Light House Feb 2013 #11

They emit flames, don't they. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #13

Yes they do, Light House Feb 2013 #17

Would using seven of them on a small, wooden cabin constitute extreme negligence Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #24

Possibly. Light House Feb 2013 #30

It is still an execution. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #32

I disagree respectfully. Light House Feb 2013 #34

You do know that there's audio of cops yelling "burn this motherf*cker", right? Gentle-man Feb 2013 #14

Yes I do know. Light House Feb 2013 #19

lol, so creative Gentle-man Feb 2013 #20

Were you there? Light House Feb 2013 #22

“Burn that fucking house down!” Luminous Animal Feb 2013 #27

We'll just have to disagree. Light House Feb 2013 #37

yeah heaven05 Feb 2013 #42

Not quite understanding your post. Light House Feb 2013 #47

I heaven05 Feb 2013 #39

I agree. Light House Feb 2013 #41

so is the owner of the cabin going to get a new one at sheriffs' expense? nt msongs Feb 2013 #15

Absolutely! Of course! Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #18

I would imagine so. robinlynne Feb 2013 #54

If one takes a poor strategic view I suppose they could come up with this mythology Feb 2013 #21

Media are beholden to the people, not the state. And how odd you choose to overlook Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #28

Thank you. liberalmuse Feb 2013 #43

+100 nt Mojorabbit Feb 2013 #59

The "State" always resorts to violence. Dyedinthewoolliberal Feb 2013 #35

Recommend jsr Feb 2013 #56

Scanners are allot of fun... ReRe Feb 2013 #61

Locking. Son of Gob Feb 2013 #62