Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 04:37 PM Dec 2012

"Not INVOLUNTARILY Committed, or ADJUDICATED Mentally Ill" have the RIGHT to own guns" [View all]

This is what so many gun owners right here on DU have said to me when I say my daughter is Bi-Polar and that she should have the RIGHT to own a gun if none of the above is applicable. I have said that I disagree, and even SHE herself has said that. Yet, these gun rights people think she should have the right. Go to a search of mass murders and you will see that many were being treated for mental illness, but never "involuntarily committed" or "adjudicated mentally incompetent" under the law. I know in Florida, the Land of the Gun, that is the criteria.

Maybe THIS needs to change???????? If you are just plain being TREATED for a mental illness, you are not allowed to own a gun.

As far as the recent massacre, this may be moot since the peep was under 21 years old, BUT as with the Columbine massacre, the gunman/men got their guns from their PARENTS, who PROMOTED the concept of guns to their unstable children.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Not INVOLUNTARILY C...