Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does anybody else agree with me that it is time . . . [View all]ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)51. Well, By RW Standards I'm Almost Sure
they would call that "too much government" control! Just sayin'
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I thinks it's a great idea. Just think of all the headaches we could have saved ourselves.
flying_wahini
Nov 2012
#3
It depends on HOW much prevention and security is built in such electoral system.
Amonester
Nov 2012
#39
Not sure. What if we end up with another Bush in office. It should be some non-politicians.
Michigan Alum
Nov 2012
#19
I imagine some are much less biased than others in regards to advancing any one political agenda...
LanternWaste
Nov 2012
#57
There's a million details that won't and shouldn't be spelled out in an amendment
jeff47
Nov 2012
#55
Absolutely!!! This crap is beyond ridiculous. I hope President Obama puts this on his agenda.
Window
Nov 2012
#41
State's rights vs. Federalism, it's a very sticky problem. Perhaps imposing federal requirements
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#65
National elections should be nationally run to national standards. It's only rational. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2012
#68