Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BrentWil

BrentWil's Journal
BrentWil's Journal
March 3, 2014

What are Obama's Politically Realistic Options in Ukraine?

Interesting piece form politico. I think it lays out what the actual options the administration is thinking about:

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/russia-ukraine-obamas-options-104160.html

1) Kick Russia out of the G-8
2) Take Rubles from Russia
3) Void the visas
4) Send in the fleet
5) Give Putin Crimea, but nothing more

I think that gets it about right in what the administration is actually considering. Given these are the options on the table, would you do any? Would you do some?

I would do 1 through 4. I think one needs to deter Russia. But that is my thought.

March 3, 2014

If the Ukraine government asked, would you support helping control their airspace?

This is a quick comparison of the Russian and Ukraine military.



If one takes the air power out of the equation, the Ukraine can reasonable defend itself. The whole Russian military won't be used in an attack and Ukraine has already called up their reserves. Moreover, defenders have an important tactical advantage.

With that said, would you support a limited role in which the Ukraine simply asked the United States to help control its sovereign airspace? We would make it clear to Russia that is our only role. However, if they entered the air space, it would be a hostile act. One would think that Europe would be supportive of such an option.

March 2, 2014

Conflicting reports about explosions and gunfire in central Simferopol

Conflicting reports about explosions and gunfire in central Simferopol http://t.co/6FNiNt8gMC

March 2, 2014

Kerry to Visit Kiev

This is a very strong signal by the US.

March 2, 2014

John Kerry: All Options on the table, including military action

'All Options On The Table' , including military action, to Hold Russia Accountable in Ukraine.

http://t.co/BzvUHMDfkJ

March 2, 2014

West's puny response to Ukraine will not deter - If you want diplomacy, it only works with force

This article gets it right.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/02/west-response-ukraine-vladimir-putin-russia

The idea that the US, Britain or France – the only western countries with sizeable, readily deployable, experienced combat forces – might respond militarily to Russia's invasion of Crimea cannot be taken seriously. Putin surely calculates there will be no such challenge, as he did, correctly, in Georgia in 2008, and thus moves his troops and tanks in Crimea – and possibly eastern Ukraine – with impunity. Obama, whose presidency has been dedicated to ending wars, not starting them, has shown he has no appetite for new armed confrontations, in Syria or elsewhere.


Putin understands the West will not respond. The economic sanctions and a diplomatic response are of little consequence. Just as with Georgia, he will act without fear of any real response. Without the willingness to use force, there is no diplomacy . He has to fear that this actually could lead to a wider war before he will talk. Is this what our grandparents and great grandparents felt like watching the German occupation of Czechoslovakia?
March 2, 2014

US ambassador calls for deployment of international observers to Crimea

Hopefully the start of some sort of response. Calling for Russian withdraw and a UN force of observers.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/united-nations-ukraine-2014-3

March 1, 2014

The Ukraine, Russia, UK and US have an agreement to respect the Ukraine's territory.Ukraine has...

I started another post on this and I perhaps went about it the wrong way. The United States, Russia, and the UK agreed to respect the boundaries of the Ukraine in the Budapest Memorandum ( http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-explainer-budapest-memorandum/25280502.html ). Ukraine has asked the signers to guarantee Ukraine's territorial integrity. ( http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/ukraine-urges-budapest-memorandum-signatories-to-guarantee-its-integrity-yatseniuk-337770.html ). If you were President Obama, what would your response be to Ukraine?

It should also be noted that NATO the Charter on a Distinctive Partnership
between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukraine. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_25457.htm

March 1, 2014

Ukraine has a right to determine its own future. If Russia uses force, the US should also.

The United States, Russia, and the UK agreed to respect the boundaries of the Ukraine in the Budapest Memorandum ( http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-explainer-budapest-memorandum/25280502.html ). The Russian speaking minority in the Ukraine have not been abused and that is not a justification for any Russian use of military force.. Ukraine is historically a nation and should be allowed to resolve its own internal issues. If Russia uses force in the Ukraine, the US should be ready to respond with force.

Profile Information

Member since: Sun Apr 25, 2010, 11:54 PM
Number of posts: 2,384
Latest Discussions»BrentWil's Journal