Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumChanute elementary student suspended for spent shell casing
Chanute elementary student suspended for spent shell casing
Posted: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:39 pm
Joshua Vail
Tribune reporter
A student at Chanute Elementary School was suspended last week over possession of an empty rifle shell casing on school grounds. The suspension began Dec. 3 and ended Tuesday.
My child should not have been bawling, she said. The principal made him feel that an empty shell was dangerous. In some peoples eyes maybe it is.
Carlson also believes her son is owed a disciplinary committee hearing regarding his suspension, and said she was not specifically told by Wheeler that he would not be pursuing a long-term suspension until she asked about the status of the hearing.
Camrons grandmother, Mary Sue Carlson, said she feels the schools actions were not just about breaking school rules, but about attacking what Camron is taught at home.
Our family does a lot of deer hunting, she said. This is hunting country. This child has been led to believe that thats not okay.
http://www.chanute.com/news/article_be4861c0-80c5-11e4-9433-0b2d9486f3e8.html#user-comment-area
Interestingly, Neosho County Attorney Linus Thuston said he does not consider spent shell casings to be ammunition, legally.
This is going overboard, imo, but I suspect that there are those who applaud this happening.
Discuss.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
shraby
(21,946 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Maybe all brass objects should be considered 'harmful' since that is the exact same metal that shell casings are made of!!!
Instead of common sense in our schools we get Common Core.
sarisataka
(18,654 posts)Zero thinking
This principal sounds like a bully They should have included the child's age
ileus
(15,396 posts)ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)back when I was in school; but in all honesty, that is probably not the case.
The principal is an idiot. The article clearly explains that no infractions were committed by the student.
The mother is almost as bad as the principal.
Seems like an easy win for the lawyers should it need to get that far.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Because if my child ran afoul of some Zero Tolerance bullshit, I would probably end up in jail. Because I would probably beat the living dogshit out of the official who did the deed. And I would not be the least bit remorseful or apologetic.
stone space
(6,498 posts)I sure hope that violent hotheads like you don't have gunz.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Problem is, there's a small detail, namely "what they were doing at the time was
(rightly or wrongly) legal".
Likewise, there's this bit from the linked article you seem to have ...missed, shall we say?
None of the alleged statements from Gary Wheeler on the consequences for Camron Carlson match either set of rules.
But that's okay, as long as we're punishing 'bad' people...
stone space
(6,498 posts)I'm sorry if that disturbs you.
I have zero tolerance for violent assholes who beat up school officials.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)I don't condone battery either, but seeing my kid being
punished for doing something that the local DA explicitly said he didn't
do would be very aggravating
Being that you've advocated for public officials ignoring the law at least twice
here in the fast few days, you don't exactly have the moral high ground here...
stone space
(6,498 posts)I responded to a post about beating up school officials.
If you want to discuss something else from another thread, please do so in that thread.
In this thread, my concern is about violent hotheads who want to beat up school officials.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Hell, you've explicitly advocated that extralegal means be used against those
you dislike. Too late to start telling us "THAT crime is bad,..." (not that I disagree)
"...but *this* one is just dandy when applied against 'one of THOSE people'"
stone space
(6,498 posts)I'm still opposed to beating up school officials.
My opposition to beating up school officials has absolutely nothing to do with the law.
It has to do with beating up school officials.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)If the cops had been called when they marched, and their gunz taken away, these two victims would be alive today.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Then you'd advocate all manner of force and spin falsehoods to serve as a justification.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Then you'd advocate all manner of force and spin falsehoods to serve as a justification.
Why does my opposition to beating up school officials have some folks so upset here in this thread?
I don't get it.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)you actively misrepresent facts to justify your positions. Granted, you don't ask for the professions of those whom you would victimize but there are pro-RKBA who are school officials. I even know one. He's very pro-RKBA, an officer in the National Guard and a career educator in the public schools. Thus far your call to have people forcibly disarmed does not include the caveat, "unless they're school officials."
stone space
(6,498 posts)It's that simple.
Go back and reread my comments in this thread.
I really can't understand why such a simple statement has folks so upset here.
What good could possibly come from people beating up school officials?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)a parent's passion deserves understanding even if we cannot grant them license.
Do you have any sympathy for the child or is your reflex for the authoritarian? Do you grant school officials blanket immunity from all consequence in all matters?
So far your every pronouncement has been over-simplified, absolutist and uncritical.
stone space
(6,498 posts)It didn't destroy my life.
And I didn't beat up any school officials.
If you find my unwillingness to beat up school officials to be "over-simplified, absolutist and uncritical", then so be it.
I'm just not going to do it.
Nor will I support others in doing it.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Were you suspended under the pretense you had brought a deadly weapon/firearm to school? The child faces a potential 168-day suspension because of a fear-monger with too much authority.
It must be noted that in your zeal you chose to selectively quote me, completely ignoring that I wrote, "I doubt that deserves a pummeling..." only to proceed to base your post on the premise such words were never written.
You and the administrator are good company for each other. You both selectively manipulate and ignore words to impose your biases by force upon others. You and he are not to be pummeled; you're both meant to be ignored. The child's parents should return him to school and tell him to proceed with classes in spite of this ridiculous episode.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...he's waiting for the paint to dry before leaving the corner.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)It's not like it was too hard to foresee the trajectory of the line of discussion.
In another thread in this group I'm being berated for not being a true liberal. Assuming my interlocutor is correct then whatever I am it is a creed that says I must be open-minded, consider other arguments, anticipate outcomes made by rational discernment and ultimately accept the facts and logic. I guess that makes me no liberal and allows others to paint themselves into a corner when they should have seen the outcome well-beforehand.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...myself for instance...
I saw this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172157321#post14
...and: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172155932#post74
At least King Fred's avatar is smiling.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)made me chortle.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...I reconsidered thinking anything I would say would only crimp the mirth.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)The epithets I would like to use would result in a hide.
Are you fucking kidding me?
Pull that kid out of school and get a lawyer and raise hell.
stone space
(6,498 posts)ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)But after you were agreed with in #16, you would not get past it.
sarisataka
(18,654 posts)Is the suspension for the child just?
If not, did the administrator overstep his authority and what sanction should he face?