Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,204 posts)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:05 PM Aug 2015

Hillary Clinton: Arctic Drilling 'Not Worth the Risk'

Source: nbcnews.com




Aug 18 2015, 11:29 am ET


Hillary Clinton: Arctic Drilling 'Not Worth the Risk'

by Carrie Dann

In a break with the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic Ocean is "not worth the risk."

In a tweet, Clinton said:


Hillary ClintonVerified account
?@HillaryClinton

The Arctic is a unique treasure. Given what we know, it's not worth the risk of drilling. -H

On Monday, the Obama administration gave Royal Dutch Shell approval to resume drilling off the coast of Alaska for the first time since 2012.

Earlier this summer, Clinton told NH1.com that she was "skeptical" about Arctic drilling, saying " I don't think it is a necessary part of our overall clean-energy climate-change agenda."

In a tweet later Tuesday morning, Jeb Bush responded, calling Clinton's position "extreme." ......

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/hillary-clinton-arctic-drilling-not-worth-risk-n411761?cid=sm_tw&hootPostID=09f282ab5b3b1a8ae22738656a1374d7



63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: Arctic Drilling 'Not Worth the Risk' (Original Post) riversedge Aug 2015 OP
It's the most important issue (climate) by a lot and she's taking the right position. Dawgs Aug 2015 #1
Hillary is being driven to the left...exactly.. busterbrown Aug 2015 #24
I support Bernie and think he has the better chance..by far. Dawgs Aug 2015 #30
wow. I am pleasantly surprised by this. ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2015 #2
Good news! lark Aug 2015 #3
She's a little late to the party, but at least she's finally taking the right position 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #4
But she appointed someone in the State Department who pushed the JDPriestly Aug 2015 #21
I don't support Hillary. I already support Bernie 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #46
Good for Clinton Android3.14 Aug 2015 #5
k and r. riversedge Aug 2015 #6
Bernie took that position last May. djean111 Aug 2015 #7
Bernie Has/Had Been Right All Along GrainOfSands Aug 2015 #12
not to steal hillary's thunder retrowire Aug 2015 #15
true, but the more she agrees with Bernie, the better I like her geek tragedy Aug 2015 #16
But how much follow-through do you expect to see, if Hillary gets to the WH? 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #47
I didn't say I preferred her to Bernie, nt geek tragedy Aug 2015 #48
LOL - JDPriestly & I just had this same conversation 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #50
I predict Hillary will practically wear a Bernie campaign button when they debate. geek tragedy Aug 2015 #51
Best make sure you have a designated driver. nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #53
She's saying that for the votes The2ndWheel Aug 2015 #8
I agree with you. Plucketeer Aug 2015 #10
You people who hate Mrs.Clinton are never satisfied bigdarryl Aug 2015 #22
We don't hate mrs clinton. We hate her Johnny come lately Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #27
Hillary is a nice lady. She is not principled enough to be president at this time. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #33
I don't hate Clinton The2ndWheel Aug 2015 #44
LOL. We're human beings. tabasco Aug 2015 #59
Right, and we're not just going to stop doing that The2ndWheel Aug 2015 #62
or a lot, is more likely 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #49
Campaign politcal rhetoric Geronimoe Aug 2015 #9
I agree with her 100% on this issue. Vinca Aug 2015 #11
another dozen changes of heart and she might get my support SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #13
Until she evolves again on this issue. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #32
The August, 2015 crowd critics are funny- "but she is late" or "not genuine" or "just one more change...". Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #14
Trouble with that very cheery outlook is that many Bernie supporters feel Hillary is just djean111 Aug 2015 #23
Obama did not sail a course with always calm waters and rosy sunsets every night, it is true. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #25
I am not talking about Obama. I am looking to the future, and to the past deeds and stances djean111 Aug 2015 #26
It is August, 2015....Presidenting While Obama until January 7, 2017. Do the math. Take your time. That is all..... Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #28
Oh, my - the usual condescension from you. Did you know it just makes you look condescending? djean111 Aug 2015 #31
All I do is mirror the comment I respond to. Call it what you will - free country, big dictionary. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #34
"Do the math. Take your time. That is all....." that is just cheap, uncalled for condescension. djean111 Aug 2015 #37
I think it is just fair writing, but as I said, free country, you can hate it if you like, no biggie Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #39
Obama is president until noon, January 20, 2017, barring some extraordinary event. progree Aug 2015 #43
Thanks for the correction, I appreciate that. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #58
Arctic drilling? Because climate change isn't happening fast enough? tclambert Aug 2015 #17
Looks kind of suspicious doesn't it? Cleita Aug 2015 #20
Apparently drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is worth the risk. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #18
It is not JUST exploratory drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, it is actual production drilling. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #35
The point is Hillary's role in organizing the privatization of PEMEX. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #40
PEMEX has been privatized? Better call the press! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #41
Listen to the Real News Interview and you will understand. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #42
So what plan does she have to stop it? Cleita Aug 2015 #19
Maybe she could borrow the clearly underused Obama Black Magic Juju sticks and fix everything! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #29
This is where the TPP courts come into action. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #36
You are so right. Cleita Aug 2015 #38
Nice but One_Life_To_Give Aug 2015 #45
Isnt she going against Obama on this? bunnies Aug 2015 #52
Obama's not taking it personally 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #54
So he should be totally fine with her going against him on the TPP too... bunnies Aug 2015 #55
It would be interesting if someone in a Presser asks him about it 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #57
Good! potone Aug 2015 #56
I don't trust H. Clinton on environmental issues tabasco Aug 2015 #60
Probably, but its better than nothing. n/t ozone_man Aug 2015 #61
Excellent stance. Hope she says something to Obama about the drilling n/t eridani Aug 2015 #63
 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
1. It's the most important issue (climate) by a lot and she's taking the right position.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:07 PM
Aug 2015

Good for her.

Obama is way off on this, which is surprising.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
24. Hillary is being driven to the left...exactly..
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:56 PM
Aug 2015

By Bernie whom I love...but its all in my mind about our country being completely taken over by
a group of Fascist Clowns.. Imagine... the House, Senate. White House, Supreme Court being controlled by such insanity.. Scary as hell.. I don’t want to take chances... I think Hillary has the better chance...

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
30. I support Bernie and think he has the better chance..by far.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:23 PM
Aug 2015

I'm not a big fan of Hillary (don't trust her), but she is right on this one.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
2. wow. I am pleasantly surprised by this.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:12 PM
Aug 2015

When I think she is wrong, I say so. And when she is correct, I tip my hat. And my hat is tipping strongly now.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
4. She's a little late to the party, but at least she's finally taking the right position
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:19 PM
Aug 2015

First she wouldn't say, then she had 'doubts', and now she's against it.

so good on her, if she keeps her promise.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
21. But she appointed someone in the State Department who pushed the
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:47 PM
Aug 2015

privatization of the Mexican oil and gas company, PEMEX. That was done to enable the drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the taking of part of the profit for Wall Street investors.

Bill Clinton was in the White House for eight years, eight years now lost to the effort to save our earth, our environment. The Clintons did far too little during those years on environmental issues. Gore emerged strong on these issues after the Clinton White House.

Did the Clintons put the solar panels back on the White House?
No. Although it would have cost them little to do it.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/tp/History-of-White-House-Solar-Panels.htm

Had the Clintons put them back on, I would believe that Hillary has her heart in the right place on the environment. It would have been a small, inexpensive gesture of support for environmental issues., a signal to environmentalists. But no, the Clintons had more important things to do.

At best, on the environment, Hillary is a follower, not a leader.

We need someone who dares to buck the trend, someone who is not afraid to call out loud and clear and persistently those who would destroy our environment, someone who votes against the mob.

That someone is Bernie, not Hillary, not easy-way-out Hilary.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
46. I don't support Hillary. I already support Bernie
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:29 PM
Aug 2015

and have from day-one. I don't really care all that much what Hillary
'promises' of late, because her promises will mostly get tossed out the WH
window, the minute she's installed herself. I know that. Reminds me of
this meme that was on another string, kind of says it all.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
7. Bernie took that position last May.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:47 PM
Aug 2015

Taking a position after something is done is pretty easy.

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leahy-sanders-voice-opposition-to-oil-drilling-in-arctic-ocean

WASHINGTON, May 27 – Following the recent ecologically devastating oil spill in California coastal waters, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) this week voiced their deep disappointment in the administration’s decision to allow oil drilling in up to six offshore wells in the Arctic Ocean, an area the senators have long sought to protect. Leahy and Sanders were joined by 16 other senators in a letter warning U.S. Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell had "not fully account(ed) for the likelihood of oil spills and the resulting cultural and environmental impacts from fossil fuel development in the Arctic region."

The letter, initiated by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), was sent just as a state of emergency was declared in California and shortly after the fifth anniversary of the devastating Gulf Oil Spill. The administration recently gave conditional approval to plans by the Shell Oil Company to drill in the Chukchi Sea region of the Arctic Ocean off the coast of Alaska. “Opening development on a new fossil fuel reservoir in the Arctic not only puts the natural resources, ecosystems and the dependent communities at risk, it also contradicts the President’s Climate Action Plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions and reduce climate change. It is an unacceptable and irresponsible decision,” the senators said in their letter.

Leahy and Sanders have often applauded President Obama’s actions to mitigate climate change and to minimize the use of the dirtiest fossil fuels, including the President’s decision earlier this year to veto legislation that would have approved the Keystone XL pipeline, and last year’s issuance of clean power plant rules limiting carbon emissions. But they see the Arctic drilling decision as being ecologically dangerous.

...

GrainOfSands

(5 posts)
12. Bernie Has/Had Been Right All Along
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:02 PM
Aug 2015

Sanders has a flair for being right, when others tie themselves up in knots to avoid the truth of their past inaccuracies. He's one of the most consistent in politics. And he's right on this Arctic Drilling. Obama has let us down once again in favor of corporations. Hillary is slow to come around, as usual. I just don't trust her at all. She's part of the 1%, and seems to just pay lip service when it's called for, but how she acts on these issues is another thing, and usually favors the elite/corporate position.

That's why we need Bernie and a Democratic (NO DINOs) controlled congress. Get the GOP and the DINOs out of there. All we have to do is unite and VOTE!

Together, we can win this!

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
15. not to steal hillary's thunder
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:19 PM
Aug 2015

but yeah. Bernie did it first.

Still though, good choice Hillary. it's much safer to lean over to a classmate and take their answers first isn't it?

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
47. But how much follow-through do you expect to see, if Hillary gets to the WH?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:31 PM
Aug 2015

I'll answer my own question: .. not so much.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
50. LOL - JDPriestly & I just had this same conversation
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:37 PM
Aug 2015

only he was replying to my positive comment about Hillary's
"evolved" position on Arctic Drilling.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1180898

Glad to hear you haven't defected ..

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
51. I predict Hillary will practically wear a Bernie campaign button when they debate.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:43 PM
Aug 2015

Could be a drinking game.

"I agree with Bernie"--take a drink

"Bernie is right on this"--take a drink

"Bernie and I agree on this"--take two drinks

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
8. She's saying that for the votes
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:48 PM
Aug 2015

Should she get into office, like anyone else that has been or will be in that office, she'll soften that stance just a little bit.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
10. I agree with you.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:56 PM
Aug 2015

How convenient the timing of this - AFTER they get the go-ahead. We'll hear about how bad the TPP is - once it's in place.

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
22. You people who hate Mrs.Clinton are never satisfied
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:51 PM
Aug 2015

You say she's not progressive enough and than when she takes a progressive position you say she's only doing it for votes.And you think Sanders isn't doing it for votes.All these candidates on both sides are saying shit for votes.There professional politicians that's what they all do pander for votes.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
27. We don't hate mrs clinton. We hate her Johnny come lately
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:02 PM
Aug 2015

nature. We hate it when she is wrong on policy for so long only to come to the right side when the polls permit it. We hate that we lead her to the right position rather than her leading the people.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
44. I don't hate Clinton
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:22 PM
Aug 2015

Like I said, anyone getting into that office will drill in the arctic. We're human beings. We explore, we find stuff, and then we use what we find in all sorts of different ways. We have needs and wants that we don't even know we have.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
62. Right, and we're not just going to stop doing that
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 01:35 AM
Aug 2015

We don't like limits. Well we don't like limits that we don't agree with at least.

We have 4 options:
1) more people doing more
2) more people doing less
3) fewer people doing more
4) fewer people doing less

Since we still physically have more people on the planet each year, that limits the options. The developed world has a declining birth rate only because more people have gotten access to more resources. So we really only have 3 options, as #4 most likely isn't going to be what we would call a functioning mass society. The one common denominator in the first three options is more.

We're not good at making difficult decisions, because we can't agree on who gets to play God, so our solution is to grow the pie. That leads to things like half of the world's non-human animals disappearing since 1970. We don't, or possibly can't, accept that we can't have everything we want. If it is a finite planet, and if we do want more for ourselves, then other forms of life have to go. Not only do we want more, but we've come to have an expectation of more.

So we want everything. We want to power a global civilization where every human being has all they could ever need to realize their full potential, and save the polar bears. We might be able to keep a few in a zoo, but that's about it.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
49. or a lot, is more likely
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:34 PM
Aug 2015

the more 'progressive' she sounds now, the more she'll back-track once-elected, to keep
her Corporate/Wall St. benefactors fat & happy.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
9. Campaign politcal rhetoric
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:04 PM
Aug 2015

As Sec of State she allowed TransCanada lobbyists to write the XL Keystone Pipeline environmental assessment. She also worked to export frac'ing technology and services.

The US Military is the largest contributor to Global Warming and Hillary is their gal.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
11. I agree with her 100% on this issue.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:00 PM
Aug 2015

Considering big oil is unable to clean up their mess from the ocean floor in southern waters, I don't know what they think they'll do when the mess in beneath ice. Obama needs his head examined on this one. It makes no sense.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
14. The August, 2015 crowd critics are funny- "but she is late" or "not genuine" or "just one more change...".
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:14 PM
Aug 2015

Good stuff.

Sanders pulling Clinton to the left so that when she is President Clinton2 good thing will continue to happen is a good thing.

As Obama said, time and politics is a river - time for another competent Captain to continue to steer the ship in the same direction.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
23. Trouble with that very cheery outlook is that many Bernie supporters feel Hillary is just
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:55 PM
Aug 2015

changing her campaign rhetoric. This is that "believability" thing.

time for another competent Captain to continue to steer the ship in the same direction.

If Hillary is that captain - the ship is sailing straight into corporate and wartime waters. That's my feeling, that is my opinion, and that is what I will base my vote on. Not pundits, not posts by partisans on the internet. Done deal.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
25. Obama did not sail a course with always calm waters and rosy sunsets every night, it is true.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:56 PM
Aug 2015

Still, not bad given the choppy seas and obstacles he had to sail around, who can deny that?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
26. I am not talking about Obama. I am looking to the future, and to the past deeds and stances
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:00 PM
Aug 2015

of the candidates. I don't even know why anyone cares about Obama's approval ratings at this point. Maybe Hillary does, so she can figure out what to be for and what to be against.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
28. It is August, 2015....Presidenting While Obama until January 7, 2017. Do the math. Take your time. That is all.....
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:04 PM
Aug 2015
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
31. Oh, my - the usual condescension from you. Did you know it just makes you look condescending?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:30 PM
Aug 2015

Not a good look, and not an effective one at all. Kind of cheap, really. Anyway, it does not matter any more what people think about what Obama does. He is free to do what he wants. And I doubt he needs contributions for the inevitable library thingy.
He is not running again. He has no coattails. He does not really care what people think, IMO. You do the math. Take your time. Try and get the concept that he is not running again. And what people think of his "presidenting" does not matter.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
37. "Do the math. Take your time. That is all....." that is just cheap, uncalled for condescension.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:40 PM
Aug 2015

The usual from you, of course. Over and out. It is not like one word, or a million words, from you will change anybody's mind about anything.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
39. I think it is just fair writing, but as I said, free country, you can hate it if you like, no biggie
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:42 PM
Aug 2015

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
17. Arctic drilling? Because climate change isn't happening fast enough?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:25 PM
Aug 2015

Where do they think all that arctic ice went? You know, the ice that made it so hard to do any drilling up there?

So the people who sponsor the propaganda campaign to deny global warming want to take advantage of global warming to drill for more of the stuff that causes global warming so we can speed up global warming.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
20. Looks kind of suspicious doesn't it?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:41 PM
Aug 2015

However, I don't believe the corporatists are really intelligent enough to think of a far ahead strategy of creating global warming in order to do this. It seems to be just dumb luck.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
18. Apparently drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is worth the risk.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:37 PM
Aug 2015

See the Real News interview here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017286974

You need to listen to both halves of the interview.

Hillary is not as strong on the environment as Bernie will be. She just does not have the moral strength to save the planet. She would have to be a very stubborn fighter to do what is right in this area.

She would need to invite environmentalists to the White House and give them the bully pulpit much more prominently than any president has done. I don't see her offending donors to do that.

As long as you have a candidate who accepts big money from Wall Street donors, you have a person who is not a free agent on the environment.

I'm sorry. But that is the reality.

Hillary Clinton has been bought by big donors on Wall Street. She is not a free agent. No matter where her heart lies on the environment, she is not free to act in the interests of the planet and the American people on it.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
35. It is not JUST exploratory drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, it is actual production drilling.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:37 PM
Aug 2015

Because there is drilling and then there is drilling.

What kind of "drilling" is Shell currently licensed to do on it's limited and highly regulated permit?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
41. PEMEX has been privatized? Better call the press!
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:47 PM
Aug 2015

"President Enrique Peña Nieto said last month that Pemex would not be privatized and the public should be wary of those who sought to “mislead or confuse” the issue.

“No one, ever, has even referred to or cited the need for privatization,” the president told a gathering of PRI and Mexican Green Party leaders on Jan. 30.

Leftist parties alleged recently that the government planned to privatize Pemex, which has a monopoly over the production of crude oil and distribution of gasoline.

Pemex, the world’s No. 4 oil producer with output of about 2.5 million barrels per day, is the biggest contributor to Mexico’s Treasury."

August 18, 2015

http://www.laht.com/article.asp?CategoryId=14091&ArticleId=673444

...................

I, like the President of Mexico, am wary of those who might "mislead and confuse" on the issue, purposely, or not.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
19. So what plan does she have to stop it?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:38 PM
Aug 2015

Would she send out the Marines to prevent the rigs from moving up there? Or is she going to leave it to a group of kayakers to try to stop the oil companies from doing this?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
36. This is where the TPP courts come into action.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:40 PM
Aug 2015

This is why the corporations want them.

Obama can, in the final months and days of his presidency, hand the keys to the kingdom, that is the oil exploration rights, everything on federal lands including in offshore waters, to the corporations.

If an environmental president comes in and tries to stop the drilling or does not finish giving the drilling rights, the oil companies go to the TPP courts and force American taxpayers to pay huge amounts of money just to protect the environment.

That may be the plan. I don't have inside knowledge on it. But it looks like the perfect set-up to me.

Remember how Bush tried to give away rights to pillate our national parks before leaving office?

Well, Obama is beating him to the punch.

We do not need or want Hillary in the White House. And we above all do not need or want the TPP.

This is precisely why those TPP and other trade courts are so dangerous and should not be instituted.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
52. Isnt she going against Obama on this?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:45 PM
Aug 2015

Now Im really confused. I thought she wasnt willing to go against the President where it came to policy.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
57. It would be interesting if someone in a Presser asks him about it
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 06:12 PM
Aug 2015

but I doubt they will. Otherwise I don't think we'll ever really know for sure, because
he won't want to call attention to 'defections' from fellow Dems.

potone

(1,701 posts)
56. Good!
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 06:05 PM
Aug 2015

She is not the first candidate to take this stand, but nevertheless she deserves credit for it. I think that climate change (which I regard as a euphemism for global warming) is the most serious issue we face because we don't have much more time to address it seriously before we pass the tipping point. So every voice that recognizes the danger of drilling in this precious area helps. I am disappointed in Obama for approving this drilling; I don't understand it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton: Arctic D...