HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Clinton Emails and The Pr...

Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:39 PM

Clinton Emails and The Privatization of Mexico's State Owned Oil and Gas Company (2 parts)

Last edited Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:29 AM - Edit history (1)



Published on Aug 13, 2015

Steve Horn of DeSmogBlog.org says the emails confirm that Clinton's State had a role in breaking up the state-owned oil and gas company, Pemex, paving the way for international oil to wreak the benefits of off shore drilling.

Transcripts:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14465





Published on Aug 17, 2015

Steve Horn of DeSmogBlog.org discusses Hilary Clinton's role in breaking up the state-owned oil and gas company Pemex as well as her climate track record in the context of her State Department tenure.

Transcripts:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14499


15 replies, 1694 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Reply Clinton Emails and The Privatization of Mexico's State Owned Oil and Gas Company (2 parts) (Original post)
mother earth Aug 2015 OP
cantbeserious Aug 2015 #1
Truprogressive85 Aug 2015 #2
antigop Aug 2015 #3
mother earth Aug 2015 #6
840high Aug 2015 #4
greenman3610 Aug 2015 #5
mother earth Aug 2015 #7
MrMickeysMom Aug 2015 #8
mother earth Aug 2015 #9
MrMickeysMom Aug 2015 #10
mother earth Aug 2015 #12
KoKo Aug 2015 #13
mother earth Aug 2015 #14
KoKo Aug 2015 #11
Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #15

Response to mother earth (Original post)

Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:03 PM

1. Cui Bono - One Would Not Be Surprised If Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Were The Benefactors

eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:18 PM

2. here we go

Who would thunk it

Another Clinton pushing "neoliberal" ideas of free up the markets

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to antigop (Reply #3)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:56 AM

6. TY, antigop, good addition to the thread. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:28 AM

4. kick

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 07:21 AM

5. "there's not a dime's worth of difference..

..between Al Gore and George Bush..."

remember that one?
remember what it got us?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greenman3610 (Reply #5)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:57 AM

7. A stolen election? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:53 PM

8. Great thanks for this report, mother earth, K&R...

I'm deeply troubled when the mainstream media's "front runner" leaves a bread trail of neo-liberal policy. Why haven't these very smart people gotten it after all these years.

What we're seeing is the legacy of her very smart influence in the biggest source beholding to the oil and gas industry.

If you're stupid like most of the GOP candidates and love big oil, it's easy to point that out. What more people choose NOT to see is how really smart "front runners" use their time and influence as SOS to line up more neo-liberal policies that perpetuate this country's DEATH SPIRAL by ignoring real solutions to sustaining the earth and it's energy sources.

I suppose this attitude has failed enough under Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and certainly hasn't taken an interest until this last week under Obama.

Breaking up PEMEX and covering up the e-mails connecting your actual role isn't a way to "front run" through an election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MrMickeysMom (Reply #8)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:46 PM

9. I agree, sadly as we are reminded in these revealing interviews, all of it is done legally. The

lesson is, exactly as you've pointed out, you can't represent big money & claim to be representing the people. If one doesn't understand by now that not only is this country in trouble due to the big money stranglehold by MULTINAT'L corporations, but all nations as well, thanks to their predatory practices over people & the planet, then you are either part of that problem, or simply ignorant.

Democrats need to choose what they empower in this election. One cannot claim democratic principles & also cheerlead the demise of true representative gov't, big money is buying EVERYTHING, their power is growing beyond that of nations, because they control everything through that golden, revolving door. Power is being purchased, candidates are for sale, who do we think they will be catering to? It's a no brainer & being revealed in so many ways.

It's business as usual, privatizing profit while socializing risk....funny how that socialistic adventure is never anything we hear complaints about, not while mainstream media is corporate owned, everything is being framed, always as a another marketing venture aimed at the public...got to sell it all as necessary, part of capitalism and staying competitive, spreading "democracy".

Isn't the very definition of fascism, a merger of state and corporate power? Interesting times we live in.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Reply #9)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 04:02 PM

10. I know that last line was a rhetorical question...

Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MrMickeysMom (Reply #10)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:03 PM

12. Indeed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Reply #9)

Wed Aug 19, 2015, 10:46 AM

13. And, what's bothersome is when is the SOS supposed to be involved with Trade Deals

and Policy that should be done by Department of Commerce and not by Department of State. This is what should be investigated. How long has State been involved with making agreements over resources of other countries rather than Diplomacy. Is is now so lumped together that there's no line of separation. How long (before Hillary) has this been going on that "we the people" didn't know about?



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KoKo (Reply #13)

Thu Aug 20, 2015, 05:39 PM

14. The revolving door at work...oligarchy enabled, not a thing is run as it should be, and it

is not longer about "we the people"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 04:16 PM

11. Recommend...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mother earth (Original post)

Thu Aug 20, 2015, 07:15 PM

15. Kicked and recommended, it's worth watching both videos.

Thanks for the thread, mother earth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread