Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chernobyl Expert Says Greed May Lead to Big Trouble in Japan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:48 AM
Original message
Chernobyl Expert Says Greed May Lead to Big Trouble in Japan
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/chernobyl_expert_says_greed_may_lead_20110315/

Corporate interests might have played a big part in the design and maintenance of Japan’s nuclear complex at Fukushima, according to Russian nuclear accident expert Iouli Andreev, who knows a thing or two from Chernobyl’s example—and who called the International Atomic Energy Agency “a fake organization.” —KA

Reuters:

Andreev said a fire which released radiation on Tuesday involving spent fuel rods stored close to reactors at Fukushima looked like an example of putting profit before safety:

“The Japanese were very greedy and they used every square inch of the space. But when you have a dense placing of spent fuel in the basin you have a high possibility of fire if the water is removed from the basin,” Andreev said.

The IAEA should share blame for standards, he said, arguing it was too close to corporations building and running plants. And he dismissed an emergency incident team set up by the Vienna-based agency as “only a think-tank not a working force”:


More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think the US will try to learn from Japan's experience?
I wish we the people could do something rather then relying on slimy republican congress people. They aren't going to move a muscle to change a damn thing unless it puts more $$ in their cronies pockets either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think the US needs lessons in corporate greed.
;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. no. TPTB are fully vested in ramming nukes down our throats
How many millions were given to Obama by the nuke crowd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:56 AM
Original message
Corporations are people, too........
....well, if you are a scumbag piece of RW shit supreme court justice, they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. There's something to this.
I thought it was particularly stupid to have the spent fuel pool on the roof of the reactor. Gravity is usually not your friend in the event of an earthquake or a power failure. They only reason to do that would be to save on real estate.

One of the smartest attributes of the Canadian CANDU reactor design is that the control rods that stop the nuclear reaction will descend into place by force of gravity in the event of a total power failure. In that case, gravity was enlisted as an ally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. They also delayed using sea water to cool the reactors...
Which renders them unusable forever after. Once you go sea water, you can never use a reactor again... it appears to me they waited a hell of a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another aspect of greed....when it was evident that getting coolant to
the reactors was a big problem, why the reluctance to use salt water? It seemed to me there was a big delay in FINALLY deciding to use salt water and lose the cash cow(s) reactors in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC