|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:21 PM Original message |
DU Darlings! Your Friday Afternoon Challenge Question: “Whose ‘life’ is it, anyway? ” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. 3) Lichtenstein? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I just added the missing one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Yes! #3 is Lichtenstein! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. 3) Chihuly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Do you mean #2? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yes! ALL my damn numbers are off by one. D'oh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. 5) David Hockney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. #4 Hockney? All my #s were off by one . i corrected the first two posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. #4 is not Hockney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Hm, I see a signature , but i don't know whose it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I meant #2 Chihuly.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. No, there is no Chihuly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. I would also guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. 3-koons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. congrats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
52. his sculptures annoy me - recognize him immediately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 08:11 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. I saw his "puppy" outside of the Guggenheim in Bilbao and it was pretty impressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. Darn it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Is #7 Andy warhol? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
22. Something about the arrangementb in #1 reminds me of Judy chicago, but not so much the style. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. No, it isn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
25. #6 = Cy Twombly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Yes, and isn't it SO Twombly? I knew a Twombly fan like me would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
26. Still need: 1, 2 ,5. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
27. #5 is not Dali? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Yes. Where was this answer "certified" above?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I dunno. Numbers are my downfall. Post # 1 I said Dali... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Sorry, but yes, there is no Dali here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. #5 is not Dali. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Is # 5 Kandinsky? it seems more modern than his era. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Of course...this is a bit of a maze in modern art so no wonder folks are looking at this quizzically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
29. Whose artists are these anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
30. There is something so strangely familiar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. The "bleed" is pretty typical... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. What do you mean "cheated"? We're ALL doing research! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. #2 apples = Koons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. It's actually tulips but it sure is Koons! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
39. 37 looks like someone's riffing on O'keefe. I know it's not her. Hmmm. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. There is no 37, there is no 7. # 6 is answered above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Finger slip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. You are right, there is no O'Keeffe here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
44. Heh. Hasty, I was. #5 = Joan Miro'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Of course! What a terrific way of finding it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. See |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
49. Any hints for the ones left? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 06:59 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. The artists of # 1 and #4 are still alive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Hint: in #1 this modern artist is better known for his Matisse like colors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 09:01 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Was #4 considered part of the Dada movement? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 08:08 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Dada predates this artist's era by some 30 years. He is also known for his scuptures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Like, scultpures of people sitting at bus stops and such? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. And has artist #1 done any theater design, sets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. I really don't know if Hockney has done any theatre designs. Good question, tho. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Wow! has he ever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janet118 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
58. # 5 Miro |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. You're still a winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janet118 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Better make sure you have the copyright cleared. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. I think it would fall under fair use, satire. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
59. Kick. #1 and #4 still need revealing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. I posted an answer thread on GD this am. But here's the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 10:39 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Dang, that Hockney was hiding in there all along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-06-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. You're gonna love next week's challenge. Drop in if you're around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-06-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. I would freaking love to! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC