Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarence Thomas Appears to Have 'Knowingly and Willfully' Violated Rule of Law for Twenty Years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Toon Me Out Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:16 PM
Original message
Clarence Thomas Appears to Have 'Knowingly and Willfully' Violated Rule of Law for Twenty Years
Source: Brad Friedman/ bradblog.com

Evidence is mounting that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas violated federal law by failing to report his wife's annual salary of more than $120,000 per year from conservative political organizations by checking "NONE" on the box for "Non-Investment Income" for his wife Virginia on judicial Financial Disclosure Reports for the last 20 years.

According to the "self-initiated amendment" letters signed by Thomas as dated Friday, January 21, 2011, and stamped as "RECEIVED" by the Judicial Conference of the U.S. Committee on Financial Disclosure on a Saturday, January 22, 2011, the Justice failed to reveal such sources of spousal income even on his original nomination disclosure forms during his contentious 1991 confirmation hearings.

Read more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8331



>>>BUSTED! But will this turkey ever share a cell with Bernie Madoff? And where's our corporate media coverage of this flatulent corruption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. He didn't have to report it because they paid her in porn videos.
Seriously though, when can we impeach this asshole?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The 12th of never would seem inevitable
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. But when exposed on a progressive website....
Did it really HAPPEN? :eyes: I'd dearly love to see his ass thrown out of the USSC. I fear I won't live long enough. I fear that none of us will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I heard a couple of folks debating this on NPR last week - his defender
was claiming it was no big deal - he was consistent in not reporting it. It would have been worse, apparently, if he reported it for years, then omitted the salary. That would indicate trying to get away with something.

Apparently it is extremely clear that it should be reported on the disclosure.

I wonder what would happen to one of us should we omit a spoouse's salary from our income tax.

Again, a clear indication of two sets of laws. One for the politically elite, and one for the rest of us.

And of course, the AG, appointed by the administration, will simply ignore this - like the laws broken by the previous administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC