self-delete

[femmedem]

Thought this was new because the date on the website was current. But it's old news. Sorry!

[annabanana]

1. Good news!.. Now lets get going and fix the dang federal statutes!. . .n/t

[RainDog]

2. nice to see!! k&r

this is better than the tits thread - not as funny, but much better news.

[babylonsister]

3. 5 recs? Whatever it was, leave it up there. Lots of people

didn't see it.
:hi:

[RainDog]

4. what's the date on it? n/t

[patrice]

5. and don't forget HEMP!!!

[babylonsister]

6. !!

:rofl: :smoke: <- - added this, just in case...

[patrice]

7. HEMP is good cheap food! So we need a smilie that's eating something. Will check DU3.

:hug:

[cojoel]

8. This article is pretty current

http://4gram8th.com/u-s-supreme-courtstate-medical-marijuana-laws-not-preempted-by-federal-law/

The gist of it is that today, the US Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of a California State case.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review a landmark decision today in which California state courts found that its medical marijuana law was not preempted by federal law. The state appellate court decision from November 28,2007,ruled that “it is not the job of the local police to enforce the federal drug laws.”The case,involving Felix Kha,a medical marijuana patient from Garden Grove,was the result of a wrongful seizure of medical marijuana by local police in June 2005. Medical marijuana advocates hailed today’s decision as a huge victory in clarifying law enforcement’s obligation to uphold state law. Advocates assert that better adherence to state medical marijuana laws by local police will result in fewer needless arrests and seizures. In turn,this will allow for better implementation of medical marijuana laws not only in California,but in all states that have adopted such laws.